Loading…
Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control
Hard thresholding rule is commonly adopted in feature screening procedures to screen out unimportant predictors for ultrahigh-dimensional data. However, different thresholds are required to adapt to different contexts of screening problems and an appropriate thresholding magnitude usually varies fro...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of the American Statistical Association 2023-07, Vol.118 (543), p.1773-1785 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3 |
container_end_page | 1785 |
container_issue | 543 |
container_start_page | 1773 |
container_title | Journal of the American Statistical Association |
container_volume | 118 |
creator | Guo, Xu Ren, Haojie Zou, Changliang Li, Runze |
description | Hard thresholding rule is commonly adopted in feature screening procedures to screen out unimportant predictors for ultrahigh-dimensional data. However, different thresholds are required to adapt to different contexts of screening problems and an appropriate thresholding magnitude usually varies from the model and error distribution. With an ad-hoc choice, it is unclear whether all of the important predictors are selected or not, and it is very likely that the procedures would include many unimportant features. We introduce a data-adaptive threshold selection procedure with error rate control, which is applicable to most kinds of popular screening methods. The key idea is to apply the sample-splitting strategy to construct a series of statistics with marginal symmetry property and then to utilize the symmetry for obtaining an approximation to the number of false discoveries. We show that the proposed method is able to asymptotically control the false discovery rate and per family error rate under certain conditions and still retains all of the important predictors. Three important examples are presented to illustrate the merits of the new proposed procedures. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed methodology works well for many existing screening methods.
Supplementary materials
for this article are available online. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/01621459.2021.2011735 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869401846</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2869401846</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QVjwvDXJZpPsSaW0KhQEW8FbyGYTu2Wb1MkW6b83S-vVObyB4b0Z5kPoluAJwRLfY8IpYWU1oZiSJISIojxDI1IWIqeCfZ6j0eDJB9Mluopxg1MJKUfoYbUGG9eha7Kl7azp2-Cz1mdzq_s92GxpwFrf-q_MBchmAEnfdW-zafA9hO4aXTjdRXtz6mP0MZ-tpi_54u35dfq0yA0jss8rQSWtLLWkdqZ2gnJtGlcyza1haUjqRhjDcSXrEldYc90IjDnTrnTOclOM0d1x7w7C997GXm3CHnw6qajkFcNEMp5c5dFlIMQI1qkdtFsNB0WwGlipP1ZqYKVOrFLu8ZhrfXpzq38CdI3q9aEL4EB700ZV_L_iF0FkcCQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869401846</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection</source><creator>Guo, Xu ; Ren, Haojie ; Zou, Changliang ; Li, Runze</creator><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xu ; Ren, Haojie ; Zou, Changliang ; Li, Runze</creatorcontrib><description>Hard thresholding rule is commonly adopted in feature screening procedures to screen out unimportant predictors for ultrahigh-dimensional data. However, different thresholds are required to adapt to different contexts of screening problems and an appropriate thresholding magnitude usually varies from the model and error distribution. With an ad-hoc choice, it is unclear whether all of the important predictors are selected or not, and it is very likely that the procedures would include many unimportant features. We introduce a data-adaptive threshold selection procedure with error rate control, which is applicable to most kinds of popular screening methods. The key idea is to apply the sample-splitting strategy to construct a series of statistics with marginal symmetry property and then to utilize the symmetry for obtaining an approximation to the number of false discoveries. We show that the proposed method is able to asymptotically control the false discovery rate and per family error rate under certain conditions and still retains all of the important predictors. Three important examples are presented to illustrate the merits of the new proposed procedures. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed methodology works well for many existing screening methods.
Supplementary materials
for this article are available online.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0162-1459</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1537-274X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2021.2011735</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Alexandria: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Adaptive control ; Empirical distribution ; Errors ; False discovery rate ; Feature screening ; Per family error rate ; Screening ; Statistics ; Symmetry ; Thresholds</subject><ispartof>Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023-07, Vol.118 (543), p.1773-1785</ispartof><rights>2022 American Statistical Association 2022</rights><rights>2022 American Statistical Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0154-2202</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Haojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Changliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Runze</creatorcontrib><title>Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control</title><title>Journal of the American Statistical Association</title><description>Hard thresholding rule is commonly adopted in feature screening procedures to screen out unimportant predictors for ultrahigh-dimensional data. However, different thresholds are required to adapt to different contexts of screening problems and an appropriate thresholding magnitude usually varies from the model and error distribution. With an ad-hoc choice, it is unclear whether all of the important predictors are selected or not, and it is very likely that the procedures would include many unimportant features. We introduce a data-adaptive threshold selection procedure with error rate control, which is applicable to most kinds of popular screening methods. The key idea is to apply the sample-splitting strategy to construct a series of statistics with marginal symmetry property and then to utilize the symmetry for obtaining an approximation to the number of false discoveries. We show that the proposed method is able to asymptotically control the false discovery rate and per family error rate under certain conditions and still retains all of the important predictors. Three important examples are presented to illustrate the merits of the new proposed procedures. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed methodology works well for many existing screening methods.
Supplementary materials
for this article are available online.</description><subject>Adaptive control</subject><subject>Empirical distribution</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>False discovery rate</subject><subject>Feature screening</subject><subject>Per family error rate</subject><subject>Screening</subject><subject>Statistics</subject><subject>Symmetry</subject><subject>Thresholds</subject><issn>0162-1459</issn><issn>1537-274X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kEFLAzEQhYMoWKs_QVjwvDXJZpPsSaW0KhQEW8FbyGYTu2Wb1MkW6b83S-vVObyB4b0Z5kPoluAJwRLfY8IpYWU1oZiSJISIojxDI1IWIqeCfZ6j0eDJB9Mluopxg1MJKUfoYbUGG9eha7Kl7azp2-Cz1mdzq_s92GxpwFrf-q_MBchmAEnfdW-zafA9hO4aXTjdRXtz6mP0MZ-tpi_54u35dfq0yA0jss8rQSWtLLWkdqZ2gnJtGlcyza1haUjqRhjDcSXrEldYc90IjDnTrnTOclOM0d1x7w7C997GXm3CHnw6qajkFcNEMp5c5dFlIMQI1qkdtFsNB0WwGlipP1ZqYKVOrFLu8ZhrfXpzq38CdI3q9aEL4EB700ZV_L_iF0FkcCQ</recordid><startdate>20230703</startdate><enddate>20230703</enddate><creator>Guo, Xu</creator><creator>Ren, Haojie</creator><creator>Zou, Changliang</creator><creator>Li, Runze</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-2202</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230703</creationdate><title>Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control</title><author>Guo, Xu ; Ren, Haojie ; Zou, Changliang ; Li, Runze</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adaptive control</topic><topic>Empirical distribution</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>False discovery rate</topic><topic>Feature screening</topic><topic>Per family error rate</topic><topic>Screening</topic><topic>Statistics</topic><topic>Symmetry</topic><topic>Thresholds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Guo, Xu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ren, Haojie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zou, Changliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Runze</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Journal of the American Statistical Association</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Guo, Xu</au><au>Ren, Haojie</au><au>Zou, Changliang</au><au>Li, Runze</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the American Statistical Association</jtitle><date>2023-07-03</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>118</volume><issue>543</issue><spage>1773</spage><epage>1785</epage><pages>1773-1785</pages><issn>0162-1459</issn><eissn>1537-274X</eissn><abstract>Hard thresholding rule is commonly adopted in feature screening procedures to screen out unimportant predictors for ultrahigh-dimensional data. However, different thresholds are required to adapt to different contexts of screening problems and an appropriate thresholding magnitude usually varies from the model and error distribution. With an ad-hoc choice, it is unclear whether all of the important predictors are selected or not, and it is very likely that the procedures would include many unimportant features. We introduce a data-adaptive threshold selection procedure with error rate control, which is applicable to most kinds of popular screening methods. The key idea is to apply the sample-splitting strategy to construct a series of statistics with marginal symmetry property and then to utilize the symmetry for obtaining an approximation to the number of false discoveries. We show that the proposed method is able to asymptotically control the false discovery rate and per family error rate under certain conditions and still retains all of the important predictors. Three important examples are presented to illustrate the merits of the new proposed procedures. Numerical experiments indicate that the proposed methodology works well for many existing screening methods.
Supplementary materials
for this article are available online.</abstract><cop>Alexandria</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><doi>10.1080/01621459.2021.2011735</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0154-2202</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0162-1459 |
ispartof | Journal of the American Statistical Association, 2023-07, Vol.118 (543), p.1773-1785 |
issn | 0162-1459 1537-274X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2869401846 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor and Francis Science and Technology Collection |
subjects | Adaptive control Empirical distribution Errors False discovery rate Feature screening Per family error rate Screening Statistics Symmetry Thresholds |
title | Threshold Selection in Feature Screening for Error Rate Control |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T20%3A44%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Threshold%20Selection%20in%20Feature%20Screening%20for%20Error%20Rate%20Control&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20American%20Statistical%20Association&rft.au=Guo,%20Xu&rft.date=2023-07-03&rft.volume=118&rft.issue=543&rft.spage=1773&rft.epage=1785&rft.pages=1773-1785&rft.issn=0162-1459&rft.eissn=1537-274X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/01621459.2021.2011735&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2869401846%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c418t-972829e2e1bfcbf726acdf54a6ec4e1b1bd7cc6098b5090a6ad70064af5ffe6c3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869401846&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |