Loading…
Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends
It is very important to understand the damage mechanisms as well as the mechanical response of T-joints involving different materials on the base plate. For this purpose, two configurations were studied. In one, the joint is composed of a base plate and a T-element, both in Al 6063-T5, while in the...
Saved in:
Published in: | Processes 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2640 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 2640 |
container_title | Processes |
container_volume | 11 |
creator | Serra, Georgino C. G. Ferreira, José A. M. Reis, Paulo N. B. |
description | It is very important to understand the damage mechanisms as well as the mechanical response of T-joints involving different materials on the base plate. For this purpose, two configurations were studied. In one, the joint is composed of a base plate and a T-element, both in Al 6063-T5, while in the other one, the aluminum base plate was replaced by a glass fiber composite. Finally, each configuration was divided into two batches, where in one, the elements were bonded with a stiff adhesive (Araldite® AV 4076-1/HY 4076) while in the other, a more ductile adhesive (Araldite® AW 106/HV 953 U) was used. The static and fatigue strength of all configurations was evaluated in bending. In all cases, the damage occurred at the end of the T-element, where a crack appeared and propagated toward the interior of the T-joint. The bending strength is highest for joints involving aluminum and the ductile adhesive, which is 2.8 times higher than the same configuration involving composite base plates and 1.7 times higher than that using the stiff adhesive. Finally, the highest fatigue lives were obtained for T-joints involving Al 6063-T5 base plates, and regardless of the base plate material, the ductile adhesive promoted the highest fatigue strength. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/pr11092640 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869554722</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A771803064</galeid><sourcerecordid>A771803064</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtKQzEQDaJgqd34BQF3wtU8mteyVKuVgguL20uaR5vSJjW5LejXm1pBZxZzOJwzwxwArjG6o1Sh-13GGCnCh-gM9AgholECi_N_-BIMSlmjWgpTyXgPvL91ugsG6mjhpKLl3sHxSmdtOpfDV2VShMnDkV25Eg4OzpuXFGJX4DQe0uYQ4hI-BO9ddrH7UVVgyxW48HpT3OB39sF88jgfPzez16fpeDRrDKXDrhHOW6sJIgpLLz1SC60spk77BWeEIWIQ4toi7JlnbGGl4cJIjjQXGEtC--DmtHaX08fela5dp32O9WJLJFeMDQU5qu5OqqXeuDZEn7r6X23rtsGk6Hyo_EgILBFFfFgNtyeDyamU7Hy7y2Gr82eLUXuMuv2Lmn4DHidwAA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2869554722</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Serra, Georgino C. G. ; Ferreira, José A. M. ; Reis, Paulo N. B.</creator><creatorcontrib>Serra, Georgino C. G. ; Ferreira, José A. M. ; Reis, Paulo N. B.</creatorcontrib><description>It is very important to understand the damage mechanisms as well as the mechanical response of T-joints involving different materials on the base plate. For this purpose, two configurations were studied. In one, the joint is composed of a base plate and a T-element, both in Al 6063-T5, while in the other one, the aluminum base plate was replaced by a glass fiber composite. Finally, each configuration was divided into two batches, where in one, the elements were bonded with a stiff adhesive (Araldite® AV 4076-1/HY 4076) while in the other, a more ductile adhesive (Araldite® AW 106/HV 953 U) was used. The static and fatigue strength of all configurations was evaluated in bending. In all cases, the damage occurred at the end of the T-element, where a crack appeared and propagated toward the interior of the T-joint. The bending strength is highest for joints involving aluminum and the ductile adhesive, which is 2.8 times higher than the same configuration involving composite base plates and 1.7 times higher than that using the stiff adhesive. Finally, the highest fatigue lives were obtained for T-joints involving Al 6063-T5 base plates, and regardless of the base plate material, the ductile adhesive promoted the highest fatigue strength.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2227-9717</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/pr11092640</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Adhesive joints ; Adhesives ; Aluminum ; Aluminum base alloys ; Base plates ; Bend strength ; Bending fatigue ; Bond strength ; Configurations ; Damage ; Design ; Fatigue ; Fatigue life ; Fatigue strength ; Fatigue testing machines ; Fiber composites ; Finite element analysis ; Geometry ; Glass fibers ; Materials ; Materials fatigue ; Mechanical analysis ; Mechanical properties ; Plate material ; Stress concentration ; Tee joints</subject><ispartof>Processes, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2640</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5203-3670 ; 0000-0002-0295-1841</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869554722/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2869554722?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,25732,27903,27904,36991,44569,74872</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Serra, Georgino C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, José A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Paulo N. B.</creatorcontrib><title>Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends</title><title>Processes</title><description>It is very important to understand the damage mechanisms as well as the mechanical response of T-joints involving different materials on the base plate. For this purpose, two configurations were studied. In one, the joint is composed of a base plate and a T-element, both in Al 6063-T5, while in the other one, the aluminum base plate was replaced by a glass fiber composite. Finally, each configuration was divided into two batches, where in one, the elements were bonded with a stiff adhesive (Araldite® AV 4076-1/HY 4076) while in the other, a more ductile adhesive (Araldite® AW 106/HV 953 U) was used. The static and fatigue strength of all configurations was evaluated in bending. In all cases, the damage occurred at the end of the T-element, where a crack appeared and propagated toward the interior of the T-joint. The bending strength is highest for joints involving aluminum and the ductile adhesive, which is 2.8 times higher than the same configuration involving composite base plates and 1.7 times higher than that using the stiff adhesive. Finally, the highest fatigue lives were obtained for T-joints involving Al 6063-T5 base plates, and regardless of the base plate material, the ductile adhesive promoted the highest fatigue strength.</description><subject>Adhesive joints</subject><subject>Adhesives</subject><subject>Aluminum</subject><subject>Aluminum base alloys</subject><subject>Base plates</subject><subject>Bend strength</subject><subject>Bending fatigue</subject><subject>Bond strength</subject><subject>Configurations</subject><subject>Damage</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Fatigue</subject><subject>Fatigue life</subject><subject>Fatigue strength</subject><subject>Fatigue testing machines</subject><subject>Fiber composites</subject><subject>Finite element analysis</subject><subject>Geometry</subject><subject>Glass fibers</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Materials fatigue</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanical properties</subject><subject>Plate material</subject><subject>Stress concentration</subject><subject>Tee joints</subject><issn>2227-9717</issn><issn>2227-9717</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUMtKQzEQDaJgqd34BQF3wtU8mteyVKuVgguL20uaR5vSJjW5LejXm1pBZxZzOJwzwxwArjG6o1Sh-13GGCnCh-gM9AgholECi_N_-BIMSlmjWgpTyXgPvL91ugsG6mjhpKLl3sHxSmdtOpfDV2VShMnDkV25Eg4OzpuXFGJX4DQe0uYQ4hI-BO9ddrH7UVVgyxW48HpT3OB39sF88jgfPzez16fpeDRrDKXDrhHOW6sJIgpLLz1SC60spk77BWeEIWIQ4toi7JlnbGGl4cJIjjQXGEtC--DmtHaX08fela5dp32O9WJLJFeMDQU5qu5OqqXeuDZEn7r6X23rtsGk6Hyo_EgILBFFfFgNtyeDyamU7Hy7y2Gr82eLUXuMuv2Lmn4DHidwAA</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Serra, Georgino C. G.</creator><creator>Ferreira, José A. M.</creator><creator>Reis, Paulo N. B.</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-1841</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends</title><author>Serra, Georgino C. G. ; Ferreira, José A. M. ; Reis, Paulo N. B.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Adhesive joints</topic><topic>Adhesives</topic><topic>Aluminum</topic><topic>Aluminum base alloys</topic><topic>Base plates</topic><topic>Bend strength</topic><topic>Bending fatigue</topic><topic>Bond strength</topic><topic>Configurations</topic><topic>Damage</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Fatigue</topic><topic>Fatigue life</topic><topic>Fatigue strength</topic><topic>Fatigue testing machines</topic><topic>Fiber composites</topic><topic>Finite element analysis</topic><topic>Geometry</topic><topic>Glass fibers</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Materials fatigue</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanical properties</topic><topic>Plate material</topic><topic>Stress concentration</topic><topic>Tee joints</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Serra, Georgino C. G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ferreira, José A. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reis, Paulo N. B.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><jtitle>Processes</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Serra, Georgino C. G.</au><au>Ferreira, José A. M.</au><au>Reis, Paulo N. B.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends</atitle><jtitle>Processes</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>11</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>2640</spage><pages>2640-</pages><issn>2227-9717</issn><eissn>2227-9717</eissn><abstract>It is very important to understand the damage mechanisms as well as the mechanical response of T-joints involving different materials on the base plate. For this purpose, two configurations were studied. In one, the joint is composed of a base plate and a T-element, both in Al 6063-T5, while in the other one, the aluminum base plate was replaced by a glass fiber composite. Finally, each configuration was divided into two batches, where in one, the elements were bonded with a stiff adhesive (Araldite® AV 4076-1/HY 4076) while in the other, a more ductile adhesive (Araldite® AW 106/HV 953 U) was used. The static and fatigue strength of all configurations was evaluated in bending. In all cases, the damage occurred at the end of the T-element, where a crack appeared and propagated toward the interior of the T-joint. The bending strength is highest for joints involving aluminum and the ductile adhesive, which is 2.8 times higher than the same configuration involving composite base plates and 1.7 times higher than that using the stiff adhesive. Finally, the highest fatigue lives were obtained for T-joints involving Al 6063-T5 base plates, and regardless of the base plate material, the ductile adhesive promoted the highest fatigue strength.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/pr11092640</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5203-3670</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0295-1841</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2227-9717 |
ispartof | Processes, 2023-09, Vol.11 (9), p.2640 |
issn | 2227-9717 2227-9717 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2869554722 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Adhesive joints Adhesives Aluminum Aluminum base alloys Base plates Bend strength Bending fatigue Bond strength Configurations Damage Design Fatigue Fatigue life Fatigue strength Fatigue testing machines Fiber composites Finite element analysis Geometry Glass fibers Materials Materials fatigue Mechanical analysis Mechanical properties Plate material Stress concentration Tee joints |
title | Static and Fatigue Characterization of Adhesive T-Joints Involving Different Adherends |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T06%3A55%3A30IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Static%20and%20Fatigue%20Characterization%20of%20Adhesive%20T-Joints%20Involving%20Different%20Adherends&rft.jtitle=Processes&rft.au=Serra,%20Georgino%20C.%20G.&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=11&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=2640&rft.pages=2640-&rft.issn=2227-9717&rft.eissn=2227-9717&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/pr11092640&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA771803064%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c334t-7efdda202918f8f09ba9d13eafb652502c006ad01f5f55bd8c67c860a6711823%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2869554722&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A771803064&rfr_iscdi=true |