Loading…

Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data

Objective: Group scholars often question whether the fit between group members and their respective teams or leaders is associated with an outcome variable. For example, do team members perceive the same team climate as their peers, and how does this affect subsequent outcomes? Such (in)congruence h...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Group dynamics 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.154-170
Main Authors: Berg, Ann-Kathleen, Bakaç, Cafer, Kauffeld, Simone
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-ed98632002cb6377df3de5ed57cbc0d789f2ed709e2da7d0964f7c6ee53f4aa23
cites
container_end_page 170
container_issue 3
container_start_page 154
container_title Group dynamics
container_volume 27
creator Berg, Ann-Kathleen
Bakaç, Cafer
Kauffeld, Simone
description Objective: Group scholars often question whether the fit between group members and their respective teams or leaders is associated with an outcome variable. For example, do team members perceive the same team climate as their peers, and how does this affect subsequent outcomes? Such (in)congruence hypothesis-based research questions have been commonly investigated through the application of difference scores. However, ignoring the multidimensional relationship between two predictors and an outcome leads to severe misinterpretations. Therefore, our objective is to outline a relatively new method to test (in)congruence in groups. Method: Polynomial regression (PR) and response surface methodology (RSM) in combination can be used to test the (in)congruence hypothesis in psychological phenomena and provide explanatory power. This article outlines an introduction to the method and offers a how-to guide with an illustrated example of innovation teams. Results: The illustrative example showcases how multilevel PR and RSM can be used to analyze, report, and interpret data of (in)congruence hypothesis in group research. Conclusions: Two interpretation approaches are discussed, and common problems are considered when interpreting results. Some future directions for testing a(n) (in)congruence hypothesis with nested data are highlighted. R syntax is provided in the Supplemental Materials. Highlights and Implications * The commonly used statistical approaches fail to capture congruence or incongruence patterns between group members. * This article introduces the application of multilevel polynomial regression and response surface methodology as a sound method for testing (in)congruence hypotheses. * With an illustrative example, we provide an accessible how-to guide for investigating (in)congruence hypotheses in group-based data structures. * By providing two approaches for interpreting the results, we enable researchers to make informed decisions upon their analysis.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/gdn0000200
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2869698158</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2809193818</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-ed98632002cb6377df3de5ed57cbc0d789f2ed709e2da7d0964f7c6ee53f4aa23</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1PHDEMhqNCJWDbC78gEhdKNTQfM5Okt9WWLkisilp6jkLiWQaFZEhmqPbcP05Wi8QNXyzrfWzLfhE6puScEi6-rV0gJRghH9AhVZxUQhK2h45ozblUgtZyvwhEqoq1Sh2go5wfCCmqoofo_yo68H1Y49Or8GURwzpNECzgPuBlitOQv-M5voz_qtuIl1PvAHcx4fkw-M226yb6TYiPvfH4N6wT5NzHgE1wpcxDDBnwnyl1pkxcwXgfHR4jXk1-7D08g8c_zGg-oY-d8Rk-v-YZ-vvz4nZxWV3_Wl4t5teV4YyPFTglW17uZPau5UK4jjtowDXC3lnihFQdAyeIAuaMcES1dSdsC9DwrjaG8Rk62c0dUnyaII_6IU4plJWayVa1StJGvk8RVT4s6ZY621E2xZwTdHpI_aNJG02J3vqi33wp8NcdbAajh7yxJo299ZDtlBKEcctqJjTXtKn5CwlYjbY</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2809193818</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data</title><source>PsycARTICLES</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><creator>Berg, Ann-Kathleen ; Bakaç, Cafer ; Kauffeld, Simone</creator><contributor>Kivlighan, Martin ; Miles, Joseph R ; Tasca, Giorgio A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berg, Ann-Kathleen ; Bakaç, Cafer ; Kauffeld, Simone ; Kivlighan, Martin ; Miles, Joseph R ; Tasca, Giorgio A</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: Group scholars often question whether the fit between group members and their respective teams or leaders is associated with an outcome variable. For example, do team members perceive the same team climate as their peers, and how does this affect subsequent outcomes? Such (in)congruence hypothesis-based research questions have been commonly investigated through the application of difference scores. However, ignoring the multidimensional relationship between two predictors and an outcome leads to severe misinterpretations. Therefore, our objective is to outline a relatively new method to test (in)congruence in groups. Method: Polynomial regression (PR) and response surface methodology (RSM) in combination can be used to test the (in)congruence hypothesis in psychological phenomena and provide explanatory power. This article outlines an introduction to the method and offers a how-to guide with an illustrated example of innovation teams. Results: The illustrative example showcases how multilevel PR and RSM can be used to analyze, report, and interpret data of (in)congruence hypothesis in group research. Conclusions: Two interpretation approaches are discussed, and common problems are considered when interpreting results. Some future directions for testing a(n) (in)congruence hypothesis with nested data are highlighted. R syntax is provided in the Supplemental Materials. Highlights and Implications * The commonly used statistical approaches fail to capture congruence or incongruence patterns between group members. * This article introduces the application of multilevel polynomial regression and response surface methodology as a sound method for testing (in)congruence hypotheses. * With an illustrative example, we provide an accessible how-to guide for investigating (in)congruence hypotheses in group-based data structures. * By providing two approaches for interpreting the results, we enable researchers to make informed decisions upon their analysis.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-2699</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 1433897148</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9781433897146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7802</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000200</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Female ; Group Dynamics ; Group research ; Human ; Hypotheses ; Hypothesis Testing ; Male ; Responses ; Statistical Regression ; Teams</subject><ispartof>Group dynamics, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.154-170</ispartof><rights>2023 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2023, American Psychological Association</rights><rights>Copyright American Psychological Association Sep 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-ed98632002cb6377df3de5ed57cbc0d789f2ed709e2da7d0964f7c6ee53f4aa23</citedby><orcidid>0000-0002-7534-9093</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,33753</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Kivlighan, Martin</contributor><contributor>Miles, Joseph R</contributor><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A</contributor><creatorcontrib>Berg, Ann-Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakaç, Cafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffeld, Simone</creatorcontrib><title>Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data</title><title>Group dynamics</title><description>Objective: Group scholars often question whether the fit between group members and their respective teams or leaders is associated with an outcome variable. For example, do team members perceive the same team climate as their peers, and how does this affect subsequent outcomes? Such (in)congruence hypothesis-based research questions have been commonly investigated through the application of difference scores. However, ignoring the multidimensional relationship between two predictors and an outcome leads to severe misinterpretations. Therefore, our objective is to outline a relatively new method to test (in)congruence in groups. Method: Polynomial regression (PR) and response surface methodology (RSM) in combination can be used to test the (in)congruence hypothesis in psychological phenomena and provide explanatory power. This article outlines an introduction to the method and offers a how-to guide with an illustrated example of innovation teams. Results: The illustrative example showcases how multilevel PR and RSM can be used to analyze, report, and interpret data of (in)congruence hypothesis in group research. Conclusions: Two interpretation approaches are discussed, and common problems are considered when interpreting results. Some future directions for testing a(n) (in)congruence hypothesis with nested data are highlighted. R syntax is provided in the Supplemental Materials. Highlights and Implications * The commonly used statistical approaches fail to capture congruence or incongruence patterns between group members. * This article introduces the application of multilevel polynomial regression and response surface methodology as a sound method for testing (in)congruence hypotheses. * With an illustrative example, we provide an accessible how-to guide for investigating (in)congruence hypotheses in group-based data structures. * By providing two approaches for interpreting the results, we enable researchers to make informed decisions upon their analysis.</description><subject>Female</subject><subject>Group Dynamics</subject><subject>Group research</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Hypothesis Testing</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Responses</subject><subject>Statistical Regression</subject><subject>Teams</subject><issn>1089-2699</issn><issn>1930-7802</issn><isbn>1433897148</isbn><isbn>9781433897146</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1PHDEMhqNCJWDbC78gEhdKNTQfM5Okt9WWLkisilp6jkLiWQaFZEhmqPbcP05Wi8QNXyzrfWzLfhE6puScEi6-rV0gJRghH9AhVZxUQhK2h45ozblUgtZyvwhEqoq1Sh2go5wfCCmqoofo_yo68H1Y49Or8GURwzpNECzgPuBlitOQv-M5voz_qtuIl1PvAHcx4fkw-M226yb6TYiPvfH4N6wT5NzHgE1wpcxDDBnwnyl1pkxcwXgfHR4jXk1-7D08g8c_zGg-oY-d8Rk-v-YZ-vvz4nZxWV3_Wl4t5teV4YyPFTglW17uZPau5UK4jjtowDXC3lnihFQdAyeIAuaMcES1dSdsC9DwrjaG8Rk62c0dUnyaII_6IU4plJWayVa1StJGvk8RVT4s6ZY621E2xZwTdHpI_aNJG02J3vqi33wp8NcdbAajh7yxJo299ZDtlBKEcctqJjTXtKn5CwlYjbY</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Berg, Ann-Kathleen</creator><creator>Bakaç, Cafer</creator><creator>Kauffeld, Simone</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><general>American Psychological Association</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-9093</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data</title><author>Berg, Ann-Kathleen ; Bakaç, Cafer ; Kauffeld, Simone</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-ed98632002cb6377df3de5ed57cbc0d789f2ed709e2da7d0964f7c6ee53f4aa23</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Female</topic><topic>Group Dynamics</topic><topic>Group research</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Hypothesis Testing</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Responses</topic><topic>Statistical Regression</topic><topic>Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berg, Ann-Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bakaç, Cafer</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kauffeld, Simone</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>PsycArticles</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berg, Ann-Kathleen</au><au>Bakaç, Cafer</au><au>Kauffeld, Simone</au><au>Kivlighan, Martin</au><au>Miles, Joseph R</au><au>Tasca, Giorgio A</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data</atitle><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>154</spage><epage>170</epage><pages>154-170</pages><issn>1089-2699</issn><eissn>1930-7802</eissn><isbn>1433897148</isbn><isbn>9781433897146</isbn><abstract>Objective: Group scholars often question whether the fit between group members and their respective teams or leaders is associated with an outcome variable. For example, do team members perceive the same team climate as their peers, and how does this affect subsequent outcomes? Such (in)congruence hypothesis-based research questions have been commonly investigated through the application of difference scores. However, ignoring the multidimensional relationship between two predictors and an outcome leads to severe misinterpretations. Therefore, our objective is to outline a relatively new method to test (in)congruence in groups. Method: Polynomial regression (PR) and response surface methodology (RSM) in combination can be used to test the (in)congruence hypothesis in psychological phenomena and provide explanatory power. This article outlines an introduction to the method and offers a how-to guide with an illustrated example of innovation teams. Results: The illustrative example showcases how multilevel PR and RSM can be used to analyze, report, and interpret data of (in)congruence hypothesis in group research. Conclusions: Two interpretation approaches are discussed, and common problems are considered when interpreting results. Some future directions for testing a(n) (in)congruence hypothesis with nested data are highlighted. R syntax is provided in the Supplemental Materials. Highlights and Implications * The commonly used statistical approaches fail to capture congruence or incongruence patterns between group members. * This article introduces the application of multilevel polynomial regression and response surface methodology as a sound method for testing (in)congruence hypotheses. * With an illustrative example, we provide an accessible how-to guide for investigating (in)congruence hypotheses in group-based data structures. * By providing two approaches for interpreting the results, we enable researchers to make informed decisions upon their analysis.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/gdn0000200</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7534-9093</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1089-2699
ispartof Group dynamics, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.154-170
issn 1089-2699
1930-7802
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2869698158
source PsycARTICLES; Sociological Abstracts
subjects Female
Group Dynamics
Group research
Human
Hypotheses
Hypothesis Testing
Male
Responses
Statistical Regression
Teams
title Modeling (In)Congruence in Groups: A How-To Guide for Applying Polynomial Regression and Response Surface Method to Multilevel Data
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T00%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modeling%20(In)Congruence%20in%20Groups:%20A%20How-To%20Guide%20for%20Applying%20Polynomial%20Regression%20and%20Response%20Surface%20Method%20to%20Multilevel%20Data&rft.jtitle=Group%20dynamics&rft.au=Berg,%20Ann-Kathleen&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=154&rft.epage=170&rft.pages=154-170&rft.issn=1089-2699&rft.eissn=1930-7802&rft.isbn=1433897148&rft.isbn_list=9781433897146&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/gdn0000200&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2809193818%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a323t-ed98632002cb6377df3de5ed57cbc0d789f2ed709e2da7d0964f7c6ee53f4aa23%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2809193818&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true