Loading…
Labor for community on Facebook
Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech...
Saved in:
Published in: | AI & society 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092 |
---|---|
Main Author: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073 |
container_end_page | 2092 |
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 2081 |
container_title | AI & society |
container_volume | 38 |
creator | Smith-Johnson, Madeline |
description | Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of
disappointment
fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer
“Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125
. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2870574792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870574792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AS8WPEdnmq_mKIurQsGLnkOSTWVX26xJe9h_b7SCNw_DzOF534GHkEuEGwRQtxkAuaRQAwVEaKg8IgvkTFAhhTgmC9ACyy3lKTnLeQcAUjT1gly11sVUdWV87Ptp2I6HKg7V2vrgYnw_Jyed_cjh4ncvyev6_mX1SNvnh6fVXUs9Qz1SWTvOgSkHagONU7rTWmrPhAAE7Bho1XjgTrugrfcWO63UxnNhhUIPii3J9dy7T_FzCnk0uzilobw0daNAKK50Xah6pnyKOafQmX3a9jYdDIL5FmFmEaaIMD8ijCwhNodygYe3kP6q_0l9AfpAXX0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870574792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><description>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of
disappointment
fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer
“Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125
.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-5666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Control ; Emotions ; Engineering Economics ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender identity ; Group theory ; Labor ; Lenses ; Logistics ; Marketing ; Mechatronics ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Minority & ethnic groups ; Non-binary gender ; Organization ; Performing Arts ; Robotics ; Social networks ; Social support ; Student Forum ; Support groups</subject><ispartof>AI & society, 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><title>AI & society</title><addtitle>AI & Soc</addtitle><description>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of
disappointment
fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer
“Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125
.</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender identity</subject><subject>Group theory</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Minority & ethnic groups</subject><subject>Non-binary gender</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Performing Arts</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Student Forum</subject><subject>Support groups</subject><issn>0951-5666</issn><issn>1435-5655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AS8WPEdnmq_mKIurQsGLnkOSTWVX26xJe9h_b7SCNw_DzOF534GHkEuEGwRQtxkAuaRQAwVEaKg8IgvkTFAhhTgmC9ACyy3lKTnLeQcAUjT1gly11sVUdWV87Ptp2I6HKg7V2vrgYnw_Jyed_cjh4ncvyev6_mX1SNvnh6fVXUs9Qz1SWTvOgSkHagONU7rTWmrPhAAE7Bho1XjgTrugrfcWO63UxnNhhUIPii3J9dy7T_FzCnk0uzilobw0daNAKK50Xah6pnyKOafQmX3a9jYdDIL5FmFmEaaIMD8ijCwhNodygYe3kP6q_0l9AfpAXX0</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><author>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender identity</topic><topic>Group theory</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Minority & ethnic groups</topic><topic>Non-binary gender</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Performing Arts</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Student Forum</topic><topic>Support groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies & aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied & Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>AI & society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labor for community on Facebook</atitle><jtitle>AI & society</jtitle><stitle>AI & Soc</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2081</spage><epage>2092</epage><pages>2081-2092</pages><issn>0951-5666</issn><eissn>1435-5655</eissn><abstract>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of
disappointment
fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer
“Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125
.</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0951-5666 |
ispartof | AI & society, 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092 |
issn | 0951-5666 1435-5655 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2870574792 |
source | Springer Nature |
subjects | Artificial Intelligence Computer Science Control Emotions Engineering Economics Gender Gender aspects Gender identity Group theory Labor Lenses Logistics Marketing Mechatronics Methodology of the Social Sciences Minority & ethnic groups Non-binary gender Organization Performing Arts Robotics Social networks Social support Student Forum Support groups |
title | Labor for community on Facebook |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labor%20for%20community%20on%20Facebook&rft.jtitle=AI%20&%20society&rft.au=Smith-Johnson,%20Madeline&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2081&rft.epage=2092&rft.pages=2081-2092&rft.issn=0951-5666&rft.eissn=1435-5655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870574792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870574792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |