Loading…

Labor for community on Facebook

Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:AI & society 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092
Main Author: Smith-Johnson, Madeline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073
container_end_page 2092
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2081
container_title AI & society
container_volume 38
creator Smith-Johnson, Madeline
description Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of disappointment fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer “Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125 .
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2870574792</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870574792</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AS8WPEdnmq_mKIurQsGLnkOSTWVX26xJe9h_b7SCNw_DzOF534GHkEuEGwRQtxkAuaRQAwVEaKg8IgvkTFAhhTgmC9ACyy3lKTnLeQcAUjT1gly11sVUdWV87Ptp2I6HKg7V2vrgYnw_Jyed_cjh4ncvyev6_mX1SNvnh6fVXUs9Qz1SWTvOgSkHagONU7rTWmrPhAAE7Bho1XjgTrugrfcWO63UxnNhhUIPii3J9dy7T_FzCnk0uzilobw0daNAKK50Xah6pnyKOafQmX3a9jYdDIL5FmFmEaaIMD8ijCwhNodygYe3kP6q_0l9AfpAXX0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870574792</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creator><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><description>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of disappointment fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer “Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125 .</description><identifier>ISSN: 0951-5666</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1435-5655</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>London: Springer London</publisher><subject>Artificial Intelligence ; Computer Science ; Control ; Emotions ; Engineering Economics ; Gender ; Gender aspects ; Gender identity ; Group theory ; Labor ; Lenses ; Logistics ; Marketing ; Mechatronics ; Methodology of the Social Sciences ; Minority &amp; ethnic groups ; Non-binary gender ; Organization ; Performing Arts ; Robotics ; Social networks ; Social support ; Student Forum ; Support groups</subject><ispartof>AI &amp; society, 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020</rights><rights>Springer-Verlag London Ltd., part of Springer Nature 2020.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><title>AI &amp; society</title><addtitle>AI &amp; Soc</addtitle><description>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of disappointment fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer “Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125 .</description><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computer Science</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Engineering Economics</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Gender aspects</subject><subject>Gender identity</subject><subject>Group theory</subject><subject>Labor</subject><subject>Lenses</subject><subject>Logistics</subject><subject>Marketing</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Methodology of the Social Sciences</subject><subject>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</subject><subject>Non-binary gender</subject><subject>Organization</subject><subject>Performing Arts</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Social support</subject><subject>Student Forum</subject><subject>Support groups</subject><issn>0951-5666</issn><issn>1435-5655</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAQhoMouK7-AS8WPEdnmq_mKIurQsGLnkOSTWVX26xJe9h_b7SCNw_DzOF534GHkEuEGwRQtxkAuaRQAwVEaKg8IgvkTFAhhTgmC9ACyy3lKTnLeQcAUjT1gly11sVUdWV87Ptp2I6HKg7V2vrgYnw_Jyed_cjh4ncvyev6_mX1SNvnh6fVXUs9Qz1SWTvOgSkHagONU7rTWmrPhAAE7Bho1XjgTrugrfcWO63UxnNhhUIPii3J9dy7T_FzCnk0uzilobw0daNAKK50Xah6pnyKOafQmX3a9jYdDIL5FmFmEaaIMD8ijCwhNodygYe3kP6q_0l9AfpAXX0</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creator><general>Springer London</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8AL</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>M0N</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PHGZM</scope><scope>PHGZT</scope><scope>PKEHL</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQGLB</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Labor for community on Facebook</title><author>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computer Science</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Engineering Economics</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Gender aspects</topic><topic>Gender identity</topic><topic>Group theory</topic><topic>Labor</topic><topic>Lenses</topic><topic>Logistics</topic><topic>Marketing</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Methodology of the Social Sciences</topic><topic>Minority &amp; ethnic groups</topic><topic>Non-binary gender</topic><topic>Organization</topic><topic>Performing Arts</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Social support</topic><topic>Student Forum</topic><topic>Support groups</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Computing Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer Science Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Biological Sciences</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>Computing Database</collection><collection>Research Library (ProQuest Database)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Middle East (New)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Applied &amp; Life Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>AI &amp; society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Smith-Johnson, Madeline</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Labor for community on Facebook</atitle><jtitle>AI &amp; society</jtitle><stitle>AI &amp; Soc</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2081</spage><epage>2092</epage><pages>2081-2092</pages><issn>0951-5666</issn><eissn>1435-5655</eissn><abstract>Digital platforms like Facebook offer marginalized individuals an appealing opportunity: to connect with others like them on a global scale. Transgender and nonbinary individuals, for example, can join ‘support groups’. However, these individuals also risk being ‘outed’ or targeted with hate-speech on a platform that offers visibility and connection. Excellent scholarship has critiqued the ways platforms perpetuate inequalities. However, few have examined the labor of human administrators who build support groups for gender identity minorities, despite these inequalities. This article asks how admin labor processes, both tangible and emotional, expose the cost of constructing a community on Facebook. Using a queer studies lens, it explores how administrators construct felt-belonging, sustain support, and defend members from being outed or targeted. Vetting new members and moderating group content act as repetitive labor processes which reiterate shared cultural ideologies of the community. This research finds something paradoxical: the feeling of disappointment fuels administrators’ commitment to continue difficult emotional labor. Paying attention to labor, especially emotional labor, reveals new tools for theorizing digital subjects and digitally-mediated social life. These tools refocus scholarly attention on why users turn to digital spaces and the human cost of sustaining community processes online. The case of gender identity support groups reveal that emotion, particularly disappointment, serves as an important lens with which to critique the sort of community digital contexts can offer “Normative conventions and our own creative repetitions are there along the way to help quell the panic we might feel at the prospect of becoming exhausted or dead before we can make sense of ourselves.”-Lauren Berlant, Cruel Optimism (2011) p.125 .</abstract><cop>London</cop><pub>Springer London</pub><doi>10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0951-5666
ispartof AI & society, 2023-10, Vol.38 (5), p.2081-2092
issn 0951-5666
1435-5655
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2870574792
source Springer Nature
subjects Artificial Intelligence
Computer Science
Control
Emotions
Engineering Economics
Gender
Gender aspects
Gender identity
Group theory
Labor
Lenses
Logistics
Marketing
Mechatronics
Methodology of the Social Sciences
Minority & ethnic groups
Non-binary gender
Organization
Performing Arts
Robotics
Social networks
Social support
Student Forum
Support groups
title Labor for community on Facebook
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-23T20%3A36%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Labor%20for%20community%20on%20Facebook&rft.jtitle=AI%20&%20society&rft.au=Smith-Johnson,%20Madeline&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2081&rft.epage=2092&rft.pages=2081-2092&rft.issn=0951-5666&rft.eissn=1435-5655&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00146-020-01108-6&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870574792%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-62b44037b07d08b79f9969c3550101f30978c04b9be9acca1f977dc45a571c073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870574792&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true