Loading…

Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description

Aim. To explore academic and clinical nurses’ perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Background. Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundati...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of nursing management 2023-09, Vol.2023, p.1-12
Main Authors: Chen, Qirong, Halili, Xirongguli, Chen, Wenjun, Zhao, Junqiang, Castro, Aimee R., Tang, Siyuan, Wang, Honghong, Xia, Yuting, Wang, Guiyun, Huang, Chongmei
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3
container_end_page 12
container_issue
container_start_page 1
container_title Journal of nursing management
container_volume 2023
creator Chen, Qirong
Halili, Xirongguli
Chen, Wenjun
Zhao, Junqiang
Castro, Aimee R.
Tang, Siyuan
Wang, Honghong
Xia, Yuting
Wang, Guiyun
Huang, Chongmei
description Aim. To explore academic and clinical nurses’ perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Background. Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundation of the partnerships; however, there is little knowledge of their perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Methods. This is an interpretive description study. Twenty-two eligible participants were interviewed through face-to-face or online videoconferencing meetings. Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the perceptions and experiences of academic-practice partnership in the context of evidence-based practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked verbatim. We used constant comparative analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Results. Four themes with fifteen subthemes were generated: necessities, modes, challenges, and benefits of the academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Participants believed that academic-practice partnership was a necessary strategy to promote evidence-based practice and could be built through different modes. Nevertheless, most academic-practice partnerships were superficial because of specific types of challenges. However, a good academic-practice partnership could create a win-win situation for both nursing academia and clinical practice. Conclusion. Academic-practice partnership is a win-win strategy for both the academic side and clinical side to promote evidence-based practice. Different modes of academic-practice partnership provide academic and clinical nurses with more opportunities to promote evidence-based practice with a higher likelihood of successful implementation. However, related challenges require multilevel measures to provide better environments to initiate, build, and maintain intensive collaborations between academic and clinical nurses. Implications for Nursing Management. Academic and clinical organizations, leaders, and individuals should take multilevel measures to initiate, build, and maintain a close academic-practice partnership to promote evidence-based practice, which is crucial for high-quality nursing care, patient safety, and nursing discipline development.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2023/2955731
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2870802269</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2870802269</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90EtOwzAQBmALgUQp7DiAJZYQ8COOY3allIdUQRewjsxkIly1TrDTAjsOwYbrcRJSSresRhp9M7_0E3LI2SnnSp0JJuSZMEppybdIj8tMJSKX6TbpMZNlCUuF2SV7MU4Z41JI1SOfA7Alzh1Q60s6nDnvwM7o3SJEjN8fX3SCAbBpXe3jLxm9NRgcesBIa08358kkWGgdIJ3Y0HoM8dk11Hk6WrpypZMLG7GkG3ZOB57e-hZDE7B1S6SXGCG436R9slPZWcSDv9knj1ejh-FNMr6_vh0OxglIqdsEjBLC5AiQ6ScBFZMIBpgA0BnkuRKqKtHYVBvs1imqFLjiuqyEzspMo-yTo_XfJtQvC4xtMa0XwXeRhcg1y5kQmenUyVpBqGMMWBVNcHMb3gvOilXvxar34q_3jh-v-bPzpX11_-sfDJ2E-A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2870802269</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description</title><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley Open Access</source><creator>Chen, Qirong ; Halili, Xirongguli ; Chen, Wenjun ; Zhao, Junqiang ; Castro, Aimee R. ; Tang, Siyuan ; Wang, Honghong ; Xia, Yuting ; Wang, Guiyun ; Huang, Chongmei</creator><contributor>Colet, Paolo C. ; Paolo C Colet</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qirong ; Halili, Xirongguli ; Chen, Wenjun ; Zhao, Junqiang ; Castro, Aimee R. ; Tang, Siyuan ; Wang, Honghong ; Xia, Yuting ; Wang, Guiyun ; Huang, Chongmei ; Colet, Paolo C. ; Paolo C Colet</creatorcontrib><description>Aim. To explore academic and clinical nurses’ perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Background. Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundation of the partnerships; however, there is little knowledge of their perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Methods. This is an interpretive description study. Twenty-two eligible participants were interviewed through face-to-face or online videoconferencing meetings. Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the perceptions and experiences of academic-practice partnership in the context of evidence-based practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked verbatim. We used constant comparative analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Results. Four themes with fifteen subthemes were generated: necessities, modes, challenges, and benefits of the academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Participants believed that academic-practice partnership was a necessary strategy to promote evidence-based practice and could be built through different modes. Nevertheless, most academic-practice partnerships were superficial because of specific types of challenges. However, a good academic-practice partnership could create a win-win situation for both nursing academia and clinical practice. Conclusion. Academic-practice partnership is a win-win strategy for both the academic side and clinical side to promote evidence-based practice. Different modes of academic-practice partnership provide academic and clinical nurses with more opportunities to promote evidence-based practice with a higher likelihood of successful implementation. However, related challenges require multilevel measures to provide better environments to initiate, build, and maintain intensive collaborations between academic and clinical nurses. Implications for Nursing Management. Academic and clinical organizations, leaders, and individuals should take multilevel measures to initiate, build, and maintain a close academic-practice partnership to promote evidence-based practice, which is crucial for high-quality nursing care, patient safety, and nursing discipline development.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0966-0429</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2834</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/2955731</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Access to information ; Clinical medicine ; Clinical nursing ; Collaboration ; Comparative analysis ; Data analysis ; Data collection ; Evidence-based nursing ; Evidence-based practice ; Interviews ; Low income groups ; Nurses ; Nursing care ; Partnerships ; Patients ; Perceptions ; Qualitative research ; Quality of care ; Video conferencing ; Workloads</subject><ispartof>Journal of nursing management, 2023-09, Vol.2023, p.1-12</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Qirong Chen et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Qirong Chen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3484-8929 ; 0000-0001-6794-0724 ; 0000-0002-3295-5106 ; 0009-0001-6532-7333 ; 0000-0001-5028-6340 ; 0000-0001-9940-5072 ; 0000-0002-6461-0866 ; 0000-0001-5398-8508 ; 0000-0003-1908-290X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2870802269/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2870802269?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,12846,25753,27924,27925,30999,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Colet, Paolo C.</contributor><contributor>Paolo C Colet</contributor><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halili, Xirongguli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Junqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Aimee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Honghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chongmei</creatorcontrib><title>Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description</title><title>Journal of nursing management</title><description>Aim. To explore academic and clinical nurses’ perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Background. Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundation of the partnerships; however, there is little knowledge of their perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Methods. This is an interpretive description study. Twenty-two eligible participants were interviewed through face-to-face or online videoconferencing meetings. Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the perceptions and experiences of academic-practice partnership in the context of evidence-based practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked verbatim. We used constant comparative analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Results. Four themes with fifteen subthemes were generated: necessities, modes, challenges, and benefits of the academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Participants believed that academic-practice partnership was a necessary strategy to promote evidence-based practice and could be built through different modes. Nevertheless, most academic-practice partnerships were superficial because of specific types of challenges. However, a good academic-practice partnership could create a win-win situation for both nursing academia and clinical practice. Conclusion. Academic-practice partnership is a win-win strategy for both the academic side and clinical side to promote evidence-based practice. Different modes of academic-practice partnership provide academic and clinical nurses with more opportunities to promote evidence-based practice with a higher likelihood of successful implementation. However, related challenges require multilevel measures to provide better environments to initiate, build, and maintain intensive collaborations between academic and clinical nurses. Implications for Nursing Management. Academic and clinical organizations, leaders, and individuals should take multilevel measures to initiate, build, and maintain a close academic-practice partnership to promote evidence-based practice, which is crucial for high-quality nursing care, patient safety, and nursing discipline development.</description><subject>Access to information</subject><subject>Clinical medicine</subject><subject>Clinical nursing</subject><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Comparative analysis</subject><subject>Data analysis</subject><subject>Data collection</subject><subject>Evidence-based nursing</subject><subject>Evidence-based practice</subject><subject>Interviews</subject><subject>Low income groups</subject><subject>Nurses</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Partnerships</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Perceptions</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Quality of care</subject><subject>Video conferencing</subject><subject>Workloads</subject><issn>0966-0429</issn><issn>1365-2834</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp90EtOwzAQBmALgUQp7DiAJZYQ8COOY3allIdUQRewjsxkIly1TrDTAjsOwYbrcRJSSresRhp9M7_0E3LI2SnnSp0JJuSZMEppybdIj8tMJSKX6TbpMZNlCUuF2SV7MU4Z41JI1SOfA7Alzh1Q60s6nDnvwM7o3SJEjN8fX3SCAbBpXe3jLxm9NRgcesBIa08358kkWGgdIJ3Y0HoM8dk11Hk6WrpypZMLG7GkG3ZOB57e-hZDE7B1S6SXGCG436R9slPZWcSDv9knj1ejh-FNMr6_vh0OxglIqdsEjBLC5AiQ6ScBFZMIBpgA0BnkuRKqKtHYVBvs1imqFLjiuqyEzspMo-yTo_XfJtQvC4xtMa0XwXeRhcg1y5kQmenUyVpBqGMMWBVNcHMb3gvOilXvxar34q_3jh-v-bPzpX11_-sfDJ2E-A</recordid><startdate>20230919</startdate><enddate>20230919</enddate><creator>Chen, Qirong</creator><creator>Halili, Xirongguli</creator><creator>Chen, Wenjun</creator><creator>Zhao, Junqiang</creator><creator>Castro, Aimee R.</creator><creator>Tang, Siyuan</creator><creator>Wang, Honghong</creator><creator>Xia, Yuting</creator><creator>Wang, Guiyun</creator><creator>Huang, Chongmei</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-8929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-0724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-5106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6532-7333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-5072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-0866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-8508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-290X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230919</creationdate><title>Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description</title><author>Chen, Qirong ; Halili, Xirongguli ; Chen, Wenjun ; Zhao, Junqiang ; Castro, Aimee R. ; Tang, Siyuan ; Wang, Honghong ; Xia, Yuting ; Wang, Guiyun ; Huang, Chongmei</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Access to information</topic><topic>Clinical medicine</topic><topic>Clinical nursing</topic><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Comparative analysis</topic><topic>Data analysis</topic><topic>Data collection</topic><topic>Evidence-based nursing</topic><topic>Evidence-based practice</topic><topic>Interviews</topic><topic>Low income groups</topic><topic>Nurses</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Partnerships</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Perceptions</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Quality of care</topic><topic>Video conferencing</topic><topic>Workloads</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chen, Qirong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Halili, Xirongguli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Wenjun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Junqiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castro, Aimee R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tang, Siyuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Honghong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xia, Yuting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Guiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Huang, Chongmei</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (ProQuest Medical &amp; Health Databases)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chen, Qirong</au><au>Halili, Xirongguli</au><au>Chen, Wenjun</au><au>Zhao, Junqiang</au><au>Castro, Aimee R.</au><au>Tang, Siyuan</au><au>Wang, Honghong</au><au>Xia, Yuting</au><au>Wang, Guiyun</au><au>Huang, Chongmei</au><au>Colet, Paolo C.</au><au>Paolo C Colet</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description</atitle><jtitle>Journal of nursing management</jtitle><date>2023-09-19</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><spage>1</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>1-12</pages><issn>0966-0429</issn><eissn>1365-2834</eissn><abstract>Aim. To explore academic and clinical nurses’ perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Background. Academic-practice partnership could promote evidence-based practice which is crucial for high-quality care. Academic and clinical nurses are the foundation of the partnerships; however, there is little knowledge of their perceptions and experiences on academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Methods. This is an interpretive description study. Twenty-two eligible participants were interviewed through face-to-face or online videoconferencing meetings. Guiding questions for the interviews focused on the perceptions and experiences of academic-practice partnership in the context of evidence-based practice. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and checked verbatim. We used constant comparative analysis to analyze the qualitative data. Results. Four themes with fifteen subthemes were generated: necessities, modes, challenges, and benefits of the academic-practice partnership in evidence-based practice. Participants believed that academic-practice partnership was a necessary strategy to promote evidence-based practice and could be built through different modes. Nevertheless, most academic-practice partnerships were superficial because of specific types of challenges. However, a good academic-practice partnership could create a win-win situation for both nursing academia and clinical practice. Conclusion. Academic-practice partnership is a win-win strategy for both the academic side and clinical side to promote evidence-based practice. Different modes of academic-practice partnership provide academic and clinical nurses with more opportunities to promote evidence-based practice with a higher likelihood of successful implementation. However, related challenges require multilevel measures to provide better environments to initiate, build, and maintain intensive collaborations between academic and clinical nurses. Implications for Nursing Management. Academic and clinical organizations, leaders, and individuals should take multilevel measures to initiate, build, and maintain a close academic-practice partnership to promote evidence-based practice, which is crucial for high-quality nursing care, patient safety, and nursing discipline development.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/2955731</doi><tpages>12</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3484-8929</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6794-0724</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3295-5106</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6532-7333</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5028-6340</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9940-5072</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6461-0866</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5398-8508</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1908-290X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0966-0429
ispartof Journal of nursing management, 2023-09, Vol.2023, p.1-12
issn 0966-0429
1365-2834
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2870802269
source Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley Open Access
subjects Access to information
Clinical medicine
Clinical nursing
Collaboration
Comparative analysis
Data analysis
Data collection
Evidence-based nursing
Evidence-based practice
Interviews
Low income groups
Nurses
Nursing care
Partnerships
Patients
Perceptions
Qualitative research
Quality of care
Video conferencing
Workloads
title Academic and Clinical Nurses’ Perceptions and Experiences on Academic-Practice Partnership in Evidence-Based Practice: An Interpretive Description
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-24T13%3A10%3A24IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Academic%20and%20Clinical%20Nurses%E2%80%99%20Perceptions%20and%20Experiences%20on%20Academic-Practice%20Partnership%20in%20Evidence-Based%20Practice:%20An%20Interpretive%20Description&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20nursing%20management&rft.au=Chen,%20Qirong&rft.date=2023-09-19&rft.volume=2023&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=1-12&rft.issn=0966-0429&rft.eissn=1365-2834&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/2955731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2870802269%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c952298ecc67b2cf03ec9c02cc76c88525fde9a479e9c04e54c1517df276d67e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2870802269&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true