Loading…
A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone
During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above dema...
Saved in:
Published in: | Renal failure 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3 |
container_end_page | 2202756 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 2202756 |
container_title | Renal failure |
container_volume | 45 |
creator | Xia, Xiaoxiao He, Xueqin Pu, Li Liu, Xia Zhou, Xueli Wu, Xiao Fang Zang, Zhiyun Li, Zi |
description | During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2871513998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4dc6b52b49f64589a71beef43b476fe2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2825812886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuHDZxXbixOECVcVHpUpcQOJmOfF41ysnXmxny_LXuTD70YpWwCGJlXnm8cR5i-I5o3NGJX1Npawp59_mnPJyzvHeiPpBccoEF7OaVu3D4nTHzHbQSfEkpRWlTMiGPy5OyqZkZSPoafHrnEQ9mjC4n2BIH8Ycg_f75bDWUWe3AZLyZLYkWGKctRBhzMT6yRkCP_qlHhdAhmAgETeSKS6wPEtZx0zWEF0OI2iPndpvk9sza7QilMi1y0sCo9nhKEHxnkygE7whesph0Bln-ZsH5-vciMW9ZNDjhNV7U23S_B8V7VH3tHhktU_w7Pg8K75-eP_l4tPs6vPHy4vzq1kv6jLPJKtaCYJLU3W8NW3fmLK1VGjgxnaG4wVCGE4BF2XbM8a7Ula1sJzJWnflWXF58JqgV2od3aDjVgXt1P5FiAuFp-V6D6oyfd0J3lWtrSshW92wDsBWZVc1tQWOrrcH13rqBjA9nmPU_o70bmV0S7UIG8Uor9uKUjS8Ohpi-D5BympwqQfv9QhhSopLLiTjGB1EX95DV2GK-JN2VMMEK9tWIiUOVB9DShHs7TSMql1W1U1W1S6r6phV7Hvx56fcdt2EE4F3B8CNNsRBX4fojcp660O0mNreJVX-f4_f_4wB6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871513998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor & Francis_OA刊</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</creator><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><description>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-022X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-6049</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37313750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor & Francis</publisher><subject>Automated peritoneal dialysis ; Automation ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; Carbon dioxide ; Clinical Study ; Creatinine ; End-stage renal disease ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Peritoneum ; Prospective Studies ; Renal Dialysis ; urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</subject><ispartof>Renal failure, 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269400/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2871513998?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27501,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,59142,59143</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Zhiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><title>Renal failure</title><addtitle>Ren Fail</addtitle><description>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</description><subject>Automated peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Urea Nitrogen</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>End-stage renal disease</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</subject><issn>0886-022X</issn><issn>1525-6049</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuHDZxXbixOECVcVHpUpcQOJmOfF41ysnXmxny_LXuTD70YpWwCGJlXnm8cR5i-I5o3NGJX1Npawp59_mnPJyzvHeiPpBccoEF7OaVu3D4nTHzHbQSfEkpRWlTMiGPy5OyqZkZSPoafHrnEQ9mjC4n2BIH8Ycg_f75bDWUWe3AZLyZLYkWGKctRBhzMT6yRkCP_qlHhdAhmAgETeSKS6wPEtZx0zWEF0OI2iPndpvk9sza7QilMi1y0sCo9nhKEHxnkygE7whesph0Bln-ZsH5-vciMW9ZNDjhNV7U23S_B8V7VH3tHhktU_w7Pg8K75-eP_l4tPs6vPHy4vzq1kv6jLPJKtaCYJLU3W8NW3fmLK1VGjgxnaG4wVCGE4BF2XbM8a7Ula1sJzJWnflWXF58JqgV2od3aDjVgXt1P5FiAuFp-V6D6oyfd0J3lWtrSshW92wDsBWZVc1tQWOrrcH13rqBjA9nmPU_o70bmV0S7UIG8Uor9uKUjS8Ohpi-D5BympwqQfv9QhhSopLLiTjGB1EX95DV2GK-JN2VMMEK9tWIiUOVB9DShHs7TSMql1W1U1W1S6r6phV7Hvx56fcdt2EE4F3B8CNNsRBX4fojcp660O0mNreJVX-f4_f_4wB6w</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creator><creator>He, Xueqin</creator><creator>Pu, Li</creator><creator>Liu, Xia</creator><creator>Zhou, Xueli</creator><creator>Wu, Xiao Fang</creator><creator>Zang, Zhiyun</creator><creator>Li, Zi</creator><general>Taylor & Francis</general><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><author>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Automated peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Urea Nitrogen</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>End-stage renal disease</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Zhiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor & Francis_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xia, Xiaoxiao</au><au>He, Xueqin</au><au>Pu, Li</au><au>Liu, Xia</au><au>Zhou, Xueli</au><au>Wu, Xiao Fang</au><au>Zang, Zhiyun</au><au>Li, Zi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</atitle><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle><addtitle>Ren Fail</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2202756</spage><epage>2202756</epage><pages>2202756-2202756</pages><issn>0886-022X</issn><eissn>1525-6049</eissn><abstract>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p < 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis</pub><pmid>37313750</pmid><doi>10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0886-022X |
ispartof | Renal failure, 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756 |
issn | 0886-022X 1525-6049 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2871513998 |
source | Open Access: PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis_OA刊; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest) |
subjects | Automated peritoneal dialysis Automation Blood Urea Nitrogen Carbon dioxide Clinical Study Creatinine End-stage renal disease Hemodialysis Humans Kidney diseases Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis Peritoneal Dialysis Peritoneum Prospective Studies Renal Dialysis urgent-start peritoneal dialysis |
title | A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20comparative%20study%20of%20different%20fluid%20exchange%20modes%20in%20urgent-start%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20in%20patients%20with%20end-stage%20renal%20disease:%20automated%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20combined%20with%20manual%20fluid%20exchange%20vs.%20manual%20fluid%20exchange%20alone&rft.jtitle=Renal%20failure&rft.au=Xia,%20Xiaoxiao&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2202756&rft.epage=2202756&rft.pages=2202756-2202756&rft.issn=0886-022X&rft.eissn=1525-6049&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825812886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871513998&rft_id=info:pmid/37313750&rfr_iscdi=true |