Loading…

A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone

During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above dema...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Renal failure 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756
Main Authors: Xia, Xiaoxiao, He, Xueqin, Pu, Li, Liu, Xia, Zhou, Xueli, Wu, Xiao Fang, Zang, Zhiyun, Li, Zi
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3
container_end_page 2202756
container_issue 1
container_start_page 2202756
container_title Renal failure
container_volume 45
creator Xia, Xiaoxiao
He, Xueqin
Pu, Li
Liu, Xia
Zhou, Xueli
Wu, Xiao Fang
Zang, Zhiyun
Li, Zi
description During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p 
doi_str_mv 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2871513998</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><doaj_id>oai_doaj_org_article_4dc6b52b49f64589a71beef43b476fe2</doaj_id><sourcerecordid>2825812886</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuHDZxXbixOECVcVHpUpcQOJmOfF41ysnXmxny_LXuTD70YpWwCGJlXnm8cR5i-I5o3NGJX1Npawp59_mnPJyzvHeiPpBccoEF7OaVu3D4nTHzHbQSfEkpRWlTMiGPy5OyqZkZSPoafHrnEQ9mjC4n2BIH8Ycg_f75bDWUWe3AZLyZLYkWGKctRBhzMT6yRkCP_qlHhdAhmAgETeSKS6wPEtZx0zWEF0OI2iPndpvk9sza7QilMi1y0sCo9nhKEHxnkygE7whesph0Bln-ZsH5-vciMW9ZNDjhNV7U23S_B8V7VH3tHhktU_w7Pg8K75-eP_l4tPs6vPHy4vzq1kv6jLPJKtaCYJLU3W8NW3fmLK1VGjgxnaG4wVCGE4BF2XbM8a7Ula1sJzJWnflWXF58JqgV2od3aDjVgXt1P5FiAuFp-V6D6oyfd0J3lWtrSshW92wDsBWZVc1tQWOrrcH13rqBjA9nmPU_o70bmV0S7UIG8Uor9uKUjS8Ohpi-D5BympwqQfv9QhhSopLLiTjGB1EX95DV2GK-JN2VMMEK9tWIiUOVB9DShHs7TSMql1W1U1W1S6r6phV7Hvx56fcdt2EE4F3B8CNNsRBX4fojcp660O0mNreJVX-f4_f_4wB6w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Website</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2871513998</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><source>Open Access: PubMed Central</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis_OA刊</source><source>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</source><creator>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</creator><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><description>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p &lt; 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0886-022X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1525-6049</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37313750</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Taylor &amp; Francis</publisher><subject>Automated peritoneal dialysis ; Automation ; Blood Urea Nitrogen ; Carbon dioxide ; Clinical Study ; Creatinine ; End-stage renal disease ; Hemodialysis ; Humans ; Kidney diseases ; Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy ; manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis ; Peritoneal Dialysis ; Peritoneum ; Prospective Studies ; Renal Dialysis ; urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</subject><ispartof>Renal failure, 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2023</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor &amp; Francis Group. 2023 The Author(s)</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10269400/pdf/$$EPDF$$P50$$Gpubmedcentral$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2871513998?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,727,780,784,885,25752,27501,27923,27924,37011,37012,44589,53790,53792,59142,59143</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37313750$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Zhiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><title>Renal failure</title><addtitle>Ren Fail</addtitle><description>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p &lt; 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</description><subject>Automated peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Automation</subject><subject>Blood Urea Nitrogen</subject><subject>Carbon dioxide</subject><subject>Clinical Study</subject><subject>Creatinine</subject><subject>End-stage renal disease</subject><subject>Hemodialysis</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</subject><subject>manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis</subject><subject>Peritoneal Dialysis</subject><subject>Peritoneum</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>Renal Dialysis</subject><subject>urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</subject><issn>0886-022X</issn><issn>1525-6049</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>0YH</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><sourceid>DOA</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kk1v1DAQhiMEoqXwE0CWuHDZxXbixOECVcVHpUpcQOJmOfF41ysnXmxny_LXuTD70YpWwCGJlXnm8cR5i-I5o3NGJX1Npawp59_mnPJyzvHeiPpBccoEF7OaVu3D4nTHzHbQSfEkpRWlTMiGPy5OyqZkZSPoafHrnEQ9mjC4n2BIH8Ycg_f75bDWUWe3AZLyZLYkWGKctRBhzMT6yRkCP_qlHhdAhmAgETeSKS6wPEtZx0zWEF0OI2iPndpvk9sza7QilMi1y0sCo9nhKEHxnkygE7whesph0Bln-ZsH5-vciMW9ZNDjhNV7U23S_B8V7VH3tHhktU_w7Pg8K75-eP_l4tPs6vPHy4vzq1kv6jLPJKtaCYJLU3W8NW3fmLK1VGjgxnaG4wVCGE4BF2XbM8a7Ula1sJzJWnflWXF58JqgV2od3aDjVgXt1P5FiAuFp-V6D6oyfd0J3lWtrSshW92wDsBWZVc1tQWOrrcH13rqBjA9nmPU_o70bmV0S7UIG8Uor9uKUjS8Ohpi-D5BympwqQfv9QhhSopLLiTjGB1EX95DV2GK-JN2VMMEK9tWIiUOVB9DShHs7TSMql1W1U1W1S6r6phV7Hvx56fcdt2EE4F3B8CNNsRBX4fojcp660O0mNreJVX-f4_f_4wB6w</recordid><startdate>202312</startdate><enddate>202312</enddate><creator>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creator><creator>He, Xueqin</creator><creator>Pu, Li</creator><creator>Liu, Xia</creator><creator>Zhou, Xueli</creator><creator>Wu, Xiao Fang</creator><creator>Zang, Zhiyun</creator><creator>Li, Zi</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Group</general><scope>0YH</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7T5</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>5PM</scope><scope>DOA</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202312</creationdate><title>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</title><author>Xia, Xiaoxiao ; He, Xueqin ; Pu, Li ; Liu, Xia ; Zhou, Xueli ; Wu, Xiao Fang ; Zang, Zhiyun ; Li, Zi</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Automated peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Automation</topic><topic>Blood Urea Nitrogen</topic><topic>Carbon dioxide</topic><topic>Clinical Study</topic><topic>Creatinine</topic><topic>End-stage renal disease</topic><topic>Hemodialysis</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy</topic><topic>manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis</topic><topic>Peritoneal Dialysis</topic><topic>Peritoneum</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>Renal Dialysis</topic><topic>urgent-start peritoneal dialysis</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xia, Xiaoxiao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>He, Xueqin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pu, Li</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Xia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Xueli</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Xiao Fang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zang, Zhiyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zi</creatorcontrib><collection>Taylor &amp; Francis_OA刊</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Immunology Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>PubMed Central (Full Participant titles)</collection><collection>DOAJ Directory of Open Access Journals</collection><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xia, Xiaoxiao</au><au>He, Xueqin</au><au>Pu, Li</au><au>Liu, Xia</au><au>Zhou, Xueli</au><au>Wu, Xiao Fang</au><au>Zang, Zhiyun</au><au>Li, Zi</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone</atitle><jtitle>Renal failure</jtitle><addtitle>Ren Fail</addtitle><date>2023-12</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>2202756</spage><epage>2202756</epage><pages>2202756-2202756</pages><issn>0886-022X</issn><eissn>1525-6049</eissn><abstract>During urgent-start peritoneal dialysis (USPD) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients, both adequate dialysis and skill training for fluid exchange are essential. However, automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) alone or manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis (MPD) alone could meet the above demands. Therefore, our study combined APD with MPD (A-MPD), and compared A-MPD with MPD, aiming to find the most appropriate treatment mode. This was a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. All eligible patients were randomized into the MPD and A-MPD groups. All patients underwent a five-day USPD treatment 48 h after catheter implantation, and they were followed up for six months after discharge. Overall, 74 patients were enrolled in this study. Among these, 14 and 60 patients quit due to complications during USPD and completed the study (A-MPD = 31, MPD = 29), respectively. Compared with MPD, the A-MPD treatment mode had a better effect on removing serum creatinine, blood urea nitrogen, and potassium and improving serum carbon dioxide combining power levels; it had less time expenditure on the fluid exchange by nurses (p &lt; 0.05). In addition, patients in the A-MPD group had higher scores on the skill tests than those in the MPD group (p = 0.002). However, no significant differences in short-term peritoneal dialysis (PD) complications, PD technical survival rate, or mortality were found between the two groups. Therefore, the A-MPD mode could be recommended as an adoptable and suitable PD modality for USPD in the future.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis</pub><pmid>37313750</pmid><doi>10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756</doi><tpages>1</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0886-022X
ispartof Renal failure, 2023-12, Vol.45 (1), p.2202756-2202756
issn 0886-022X
1525-6049
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2871513998
source Open Access: PubMed Central; Taylor & Francis_OA刊; Publicly Available Content (ProQuest)
subjects Automated peritoneal dialysis
Automation
Blood Urea Nitrogen
Carbon dioxide
Clinical Study
Creatinine
End-stage renal disease
Hemodialysis
Humans
Kidney diseases
Kidney Failure, Chronic - therapy
manual fluid exchange peritoneal dialysis
Peritoneal Dialysis
Peritoneum
Prospective Studies
Renal Dialysis
urgent-start peritoneal dialysis
title A randomized controlled comparative study of different fluid exchange modes in urgent-start peritoneal dialysis in patients with end-stage renal disease: automated peritoneal dialysis combined with manual fluid exchange vs. manual fluid exchange alone
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T08%3A56%3A34IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20controlled%20comparative%20study%20of%20different%20fluid%20exchange%20modes%20in%20urgent-start%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20in%20patients%20with%20end-stage%20renal%20disease:%20automated%20peritoneal%20dialysis%20combined%20with%20manual%20fluid%20exchange%20vs.%20manual%20fluid%20exchange%20alone&rft.jtitle=Renal%20failure&rft.au=Xia,%20Xiaoxiao&rft.date=2023-12&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=2202756&rft.epage=2202756&rft.pages=2202756-2202756&rft.issn=0886-022X&rft.eissn=1525-6049&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/0886022X.2023.2202756&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2825812886%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c563t-81498e528d4b29d9c7d39f05ae2dfbd2fbde55d20ebde39c112b38465f2186ab3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2871513998&rft_id=info:pmid/37313750&rfr_iscdi=true