Loading…

Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis

Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:International journal of consumer studies 2023-11, Vol.47 (6), p.2528-2552
Main Authors: Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn, Kalro, Arti D.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3
container_end_page 2552
container_issue 6
container_start_page 2528
container_title International journal of consumer studies
container_volume 47
creator Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn
Kalro, Arti D.
description Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐mouth (NeWOM). Researchers need to study the spread of NWOM/NeWOM to prevent adverse consequences for companies and suggest an optimal response for its redressal. Existing literature review studies have focused on word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) and have considered both positive and negative WOM and eWOM concurrently. Past literature reviews have captured the breadth of the WOM domain, ignoring the depth. This research article contains a review of 282 journal papers capturing the depth of the extant literature by focusing solely on ‘negative’ WOM and eWOM (NWOM and NeWOM), and presents a broad view of the NWOM and NeWOM domains using morphological analysis (MA). This will help to conceptualize and categorize the existing state‐of‐the‐art literature into broad dimensions and identify future research opportunities. The MA framework helps to bifurcate this literature into the following four dimensions: (i) nomenclature of NWOM and NeWOM, (ii) antecedents of NWOM/NeWOM, (iii) impacts of NWOM/NeWOM, and (iv) prevention and recovery response to NeWOM. Further dissection of these four dimensions leads to 15 sub‐dimensions and 217 variants. Combinations of the 217 variants enable the identification of 550 novel future research opportunities in the area of NWOM and NeWOM.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/ijcs.12962
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2872515392</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2872515392</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgrV78BQFvwtZ87oe3UqwKBS96DjGZtFt2N2uyVXrzJ_gb_SWmVvTgHGaGmfeGeQ-hc0omNMVVvTZxQlmVswM0oqIgWS44PfztGT9GJzGuCaF5KfkIdXO_CdiC0RYi9g53sNRD_Qr4zQf7-f7hXUqt3wwrrDv7t4YGzBB8V5v_yGs8xa0P_co3flkb3SSqbraxjqfoyOkmwtlPHaOn-c3j7C5bPNzez6aLzHCaD5lwVV5RJwrNy1KKyjhrgHAiqbM8iRNpSqQEYoWRoCUhwJ-NLkRBLSsl8DG62N_tg3_ZQBzUOulMT0TFyoJJKnnFEupyjzLBxxjAqT7UrQ5bRYna-al2fqpvP_kXxEpteg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2872515392</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis</title><source>EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn ; Kalro, Arti D.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn ; Kalro, Arti D.</creatorcontrib><description>Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐mouth (NeWOM). Researchers need to study the spread of NWOM/NeWOM to prevent adverse consequences for companies and suggest an optimal response for its redressal. Existing literature review studies have focused on word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) and have considered both positive and negative WOM and eWOM concurrently. Past literature reviews have captured the breadth of the WOM domain, ignoring the depth. This research article contains a review of 282 journal papers capturing the depth of the extant literature by focusing solely on ‘negative’ WOM and eWOM (NWOM and NeWOM), and presents a broad view of the NWOM and NeWOM domains using morphological analysis (MA). This will help to conceptualize and categorize the existing state‐of‐the‐art literature into broad dimensions and identify future research opportunities. The MA framework helps to bifurcate this literature into the following four dimensions: (i) nomenclature of NWOM and NeWOM, (ii) antecedents of NWOM/NeWOM, (iii) impacts of NWOM/NeWOM, and (iv) prevention and recovery response to NeWOM. Further dissection of these four dimensions leads to 15 sub‐dimensions and 217 variants. Combinations of the 217 variants enable the identification of 550 novel future research opportunities in the area of NWOM and NeWOM.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1470-6423</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1470-6431</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/ijcs.12962</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Customers ; Dissection ; Morphology ; Social media ; Social networks ; Systematic review ; Variants ; Word of mouth advertising</subject><ispartof>International journal of consumer studies, 2023-11, Vol.47 (6), p.2528-2552</ispartof><rights>2023 John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5249-4485 ; 0000-0002-2913-6361</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,30976,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalro, Arti D.</creatorcontrib><title>Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis</title><title>International journal of consumer studies</title><description>Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐mouth (NeWOM). Researchers need to study the spread of NWOM/NeWOM to prevent adverse consequences for companies and suggest an optimal response for its redressal. Existing literature review studies have focused on word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) and have considered both positive and negative WOM and eWOM concurrently. Past literature reviews have captured the breadth of the WOM domain, ignoring the depth. This research article contains a review of 282 journal papers capturing the depth of the extant literature by focusing solely on ‘negative’ WOM and eWOM (NWOM and NeWOM), and presents a broad view of the NWOM and NeWOM domains using morphological analysis (MA). This will help to conceptualize and categorize the existing state‐of‐the‐art literature into broad dimensions and identify future research opportunities. The MA framework helps to bifurcate this literature into the following four dimensions: (i) nomenclature of NWOM and NeWOM, (ii) antecedents of NWOM/NeWOM, (iii) impacts of NWOM/NeWOM, and (iv) prevention and recovery response to NeWOM. Further dissection of these four dimensions leads to 15 sub‐dimensions and 217 variants. Combinations of the 217 variants enable the identification of 550 novel future research opportunities in the area of NWOM and NeWOM.</description><subject>Customers</subject><subject>Dissection</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Variants</subject><subject>Word of mouth advertising</subject><issn>1470-6423</issn><issn>1470-6431</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7QJ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNplUE1LAzEQDaJgrV78BQFvwtZ87oe3UqwKBS96DjGZtFt2N2uyVXrzJ_gb_SWmVvTgHGaGmfeGeQ-hc0omNMVVvTZxQlmVswM0oqIgWS44PfztGT9GJzGuCaF5KfkIdXO_CdiC0RYi9g53sNRD_Qr4zQf7-f7hXUqt3wwrrDv7t4YGzBB8V5v_yGs8xa0P_co3flkb3SSqbraxjqfoyOkmwtlPHaOn-c3j7C5bPNzez6aLzHCaD5lwVV5RJwrNy1KKyjhrgHAiqbM8iRNpSqQEYoWRoCUhwJ-NLkRBLSsl8DG62N_tg3_ZQBzUOulMT0TFyoJJKnnFEupyjzLBxxjAqT7UrQ5bRYna-al2fqpvP_kXxEpteg</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn</creator><creator>Kalro, Arti D.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QJ</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-4485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-6361</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis</title><author>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn ; Kalro, Arti D.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Customers</topic><topic>Dissection</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Variants</topic><topic>Word of mouth advertising</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kalro, Arti D.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts (ASSIA)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ribeiro, Dahlia Allwyn</au><au>Kalro, Arti D.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis</atitle><jtitle>International journal of consumer studies</jtitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>2528</spage><epage>2552</epage><pages>2528-2552</pages><issn>1470-6423</issn><eissn>1470-6431</eissn><abstract>Customers voice their negative brand experiences to their family and friends in the form of negative word‐of‐mouth (NWOM). Web 2.0 enables the sharing of NWOM in electronic format on various social media sites, online customer review forums, and blogs, which is known as negative electronic word‐of‐mouth (NeWOM). Researchers need to study the spread of NWOM/NeWOM to prevent adverse consequences for companies and suggest an optimal response for its redressal. Existing literature review studies have focused on word‐of‐mouth (WOM) and electronic WOM (eWOM) and have considered both positive and negative WOM and eWOM concurrently. Past literature reviews have captured the breadth of the WOM domain, ignoring the depth. This research article contains a review of 282 journal papers capturing the depth of the extant literature by focusing solely on ‘negative’ WOM and eWOM (NWOM and NeWOM), and presents a broad view of the NWOM and NeWOM domains using morphological analysis (MA). This will help to conceptualize and categorize the existing state‐of‐the‐art literature into broad dimensions and identify future research opportunities. The MA framework helps to bifurcate this literature into the following four dimensions: (i) nomenclature of NWOM and NeWOM, (ii) antecedents of NWOM/NeWOM, (iii) impacts of NWOM/NeWOM, and (iv) prevention and recovery response to NeWOM. Further dissection of these four dimensions leads to 15 sub‐dimensions and 217 variants. Combinations of the 217 variants enable the identification of 550 novel future research opportunities in the area of NWOM and NeWOM.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/ijcs.12962</doi><tpages>25</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5249-4485</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2913-6361</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1470-6423
ispartof International journal of consumer studies, 2023-11, Vol.47 (6), p.2528-2552
issn 1470-6423
1470-6431
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2872515392
source EBSCOhost Business Source Ultimate; Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts (ASSIA); International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Customers
Dissection
Morphology
Social media
Social networks
Systematic review
Variants
Word of mouth advertising
title Four decades of negative word‐of‐mouth and negative electronic word‐of‐mouth: A morphological analysis
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-03T09%3A33%3A56IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Four%20decades%20of%20negative%20word%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90mouth%20and%20negative%20electronic%20word%E2%80%90of%E2%80%90mouth:%20A%20morphological%20analysis&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20consumer%20studies&rft.au=Ribeiro,%20Dahlia%20Allwyn&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=2528&rft.epage=2552&rft.pages=2528-2552&rft.issn=1470-6423&rft.eissn=1470-6431&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/ijcs.12962&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2872515392%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c316t-4f9691f47a388549cfdce03051fd39624885055e0d4c5ea500e3bca7471d285e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2872515392&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true