Reliability, validity, and predictability of screening methods for noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injury- A systematic review

Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed full-text articles reporting ACL injury screening methods' reliability, validity, and predictability, articles that reported the analysis of primary ACL injury and considered the biomechanical evaluation of kinematic and kinetic variables of the hip, knee,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of science and medicine in sport 2023-10, Vol.26, p.S110-S111
Main Authors: Manoj Rajakaruna, P., Dempsey, A.R., Learmonth, Y.C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Joint and ligament injuries
Systematic review
Validity
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Inclusion criteria were: peer-reviewed full-text articles reporting ACL injury screening methods' reliability, validity, and predictability, articles that reported the analysis of primary ACL injury and considered the biomechanical evaluation of kinematic and kinetic variables of the hip, knee, and ankle during a specific sporting task in both frontal and sagittal planes and the study done on humans. In the included studies, 16 studies reported the ability to predict injury risk, 59 studies reported the reliability of the screening method, and 13 studies reported the validity of the screening method against the gold standard 3D motion analysis system. The 3D motion analysis demonstrated good to excellent intra-rater reliability, ranging from ICC= 0.760-0.980, and moderate to excellent inter-session reliability, ranging from ICC= 0.600-0.916. The 2D video motion analysis showed moderate to excellent intra-rater reliability, ranging from ICC= 0.672-1.000, and good to excellent inter-session reliability, ranging from ICC= 0.720-0.960.
ISSN:1440-2440
1878-1861
DOI:10.1016/j.jsams.2023.08.136