Loading…
Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review
This paper presents a comparative analysis of different optimization techniques for the K-means algorithm in the context of big data. K-means is a widely used clustering algorithm, but it can suffer from scalability issues when dealing with large datasets. The paper explores different approaches to...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2024-05 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Mussabayev, Ravil Mussabayev, Rustam |
description | This paper presents a comparative analysis of different optimization techniques for the K-means algorithm in the context of big data. K-means is a widely used clustering algorithm, but it can suffer from scalability issues when dealing with large datasets. The paper explores different approaches to overcome these issues, including parallelization, approximation, and sampling methods. The authors evaluate the performance of various clustering techniques on a large number of benchmark datasets, comparing them according to the dominance criterion provided by the "less is more" approach (LIMA), i.e., simultaneously along the dimensions of speed, clustering quality, and simplicity. The results show that different techniques are more suitable for different types of datasets and provide insights into the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in K-means clustering for big data. Overall, the paper offers a comprehensive guide for practitioners and researchers on how to optimize K-means for big data applications. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2878363368</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2878363368</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_28783633683</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNjcsKwjAQAIMgWLT_sOC5UBOtxVuNiuBBUO-Sw7astEnNpr6-3h78AE9zmIEZiEgqNUvyuZQjETPf0jSV2VIuFioSqF3TGm8CPRAKa-o3E4Mr4dgGaujTC2fhHPoCK0KG0nk4JA0ay6DrjgN6shWQhTVVsDHBgHY24CvwCgo44YPwORHD0tSM8Y9jMd1tL3qftN7dO-RwvbnO93e-ynyZq0ypLFf_VV9K50ZH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2878363368</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Mussabayev, Ravil ; Mussabayev, Rustam</creator><creatorcontrib>Mussabayev, Ravil ; Mussabayev, Rustam</creatorcontrib><description>This paper presents a comparative analysis of different optimization techniques for the K-means algorithm in the context of big data. K-means is a widely used clustering algorithm, but it can suffer from scalability issues when dealing with large datasets. The paper explores different approaches to overcome these issues, including parallelization, approximation, and sampling methods. The authors evaluate the performance of various clustering techniques on a large number of benchmark datasets, comparing them according to the dominance criterion provided by the "less is more" approach (LIMA), i.e., simultaneously along the dimensions of speed, clustering quality, and simplicity. The results show that different techniques are more suitable for different types of datasets and provide insights into the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in K-means clustering for big data. Overall, the paper offers a comprehensive guide for practitioners and researchers on how to optimize K-means for big data applications.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Big Data ; Cluster analysis ; Clustering ; Comparative studies ; Datasets ; Optimization ; Vector quantization</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-05</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2878363368?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25751,37010,44588</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Mussabayev, Ravil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussabayev, Rustam</creatorcontrib><title>Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>This paper presents a comparative analysis of different optimization techniques for the K-means algorithm in the context of big data. K-means is a widely used clustering algorithm, but it can suffer from scalability issues when dealing with large datasets. The paper explores different approaches to overcome these issues, including parallelization, approximation, and sampling methods. The authors evaluate the performance of various clustering techniques on a large number of benchmark datasets, comparing them according to the dominance criterion provided by the "less is more" approach (LIMA), i.e., simultaneously along the dimensions of speed, clustering quality, and simplicity. The results show that different techniques are more suitable for different types of datasets and provide insights into the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in K-means clustering for big data. Overall, the paper offers a comprehensive guide for practitioners and researchers on how to optimize K-means for big data applications.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Big Data</subject><subject>Cluster analysis</subject><subject>Clustering</subject><subject>Comparative studies</subject><subject>Datasets</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Vector quantization</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNjcsKwjAQAIMgWLT_sOC5UBOtxVuNiuBBUO-Sw7astEnNpr6-3h78AE9zmIEZiEgqNUvyuZQjETPf0jSV2VIuFioSqF3TGm8CPRAKa-o3E4Mr4dgGaujTC2fhHPoCK0KG0nk4JA0ay6DrjgN6shWQhTVVsDHBgHY24CvwCgo44YPwORHD0tSM8Y9jMd1tL3qftN7dO-RwvbnO93e-ynyZq0ypLFf_VV9K50ZH</recordid><startdate>20240520</startdate><enddate>20240520</enddate><creator>Mussabayev, Ravil</creator><creator>Mussabayev, Rustam</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240520</creationdate><title>Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review</title><author>Mussabayev, Ravil ; Mussabayev, Rustam</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28783633683</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Big Data</topic><topic>Cluster analysis</topic><topic>Clustering</topic><topic>Comparative studies</topic><topic>Datasets</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Vector quantization</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Mussabayev, Ravil</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mussabayev, Rustam</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Mussabayev, Ravil</au><au>Mussabayev, Rustam</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-05-20</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>This paper presents a comparative analysis of different optimization techniques for the K-means algorithm in the context of big data. K-means is a widely used clustering algorithm, but it can suffer from scalability issues when dealing with large datasets. The paper explores different approaches to overcome these issues, including parallelization, approximation, and sampling methods. The authors evaluate the performance of various clustering techniques on a large number of benchmark datasets, comparing them according to the dominance criterion provided by the "less is more" approach (LIMA), i.e., simultaneously along the dimensions of speed, clustering quality, and simplicity. The results show that different techniques are more suitable for different types of datasets and provide insights into the trade-offs between speed and accuracy in K-means clustering for big data. Overall, the paper offers a comprehensive guide for practitioners and researchers on how to optimize K-means for big data applications.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-05 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2878363368 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Algorithms Big Data Cluster analysis Clustering Comparative studies Datasets Optimization Vector quantization |
title | Comparative Analysis of Optimization Strategies for K-means Clustering in Big Data Contexts: A Review |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T17%3A44%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Comparative%20Analysis%20of%20Optimization%20Strategies%20for%20K-means%20Clustering%20in%20Big%20Data%20Contexts:%20A%20Review&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Mussabayev,%20Ravil&rft.date=2024-05-20&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2878363368%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_28783633683%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2878363368&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |