Loading…
Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge
Disciplinary knowledge lies at the heart of academic work. However, connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as teachers has been a longstanding challenge for (research-intensive) universities. This is reflected in criticism of the practices that aim to support...
Saved in:
Published in: | Higher education 2023-10, Vol.86 (4), p.969-984 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43 |
container_end_page | 984 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 969 |
container_title | Higher education |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | van Dijk, Esther E. Geertsema, Johan van der Schaaf, Marieke F. van Tartwijk, Jan Kluijtmans, Manon |
description | Disciplinary knowledge lies at the heart of academic work. However, connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as teachers has been a longstanding challenge for (research-intensive) universities. This is reflected in criticism of the practices that aim to support the professional development of university teachers. In order to create better connections, a deeper understanding is needed of how academics’ disciplinary knowledge relates to the development of their teaching. In this paper, we therefore aim to advance theoretical insights about how academics’ disciplinary knowledge connects to their professional development as university teachers. We do so by providing a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Literature discussed as part of the teacher expertise perspective provides insights into how knowledge is structured in order to perform teacher tasks. In our discussion of the teacher knowledge perspective, we include bodies of literature about teachers’ knowledge base to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in how to teach and about powerful knowledge to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in what to teach. Insights from these bodies of literature can, from a teacher knowledge perspective, offer theoretical underpinnings for connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers. Adaptive expertise and practical knowledge are identified as concepts that include elements of both teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Based on the conceptual analysis, we identify and discuss three aspects related to supporting the professional development of university teachers where attention to connection with teachers’ disciplinary knowledge is important. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10734-022-00953-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2882111602</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A770485219</galeid><ericid>EJ1397901</ericid><sourcerecordid>A770485219</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UsuKFDEULUTBdvQHBCHgusabRz3ibmjGFwNuFNyFdOqmJmN1Uibp0d75G36Cv-WXmLGcHoTGVcI959znqaqnFE4pQPciUei4qIGxGkA2vGb3qhVtOl7TTny6X60AaF_TpoWH1aOUrgCA0Yavqp_r4D2a7PxItNEDbp1Jv77_IINLxs2T8zruyWcfvk44jEhyIPkSXSRzDBZTcsHriQx4jVOYt-gz0YnsvLvGmFzek4zaXJb_S6KJCd7gnHdFoItqn1wiwd5SCH6bMWaXsKDDIXoo_bh6YPWU8Mnf96T6-Or8w_pNffH-9dv12UVthIRcS0ZB9ry3wpZpBisY18IKwTVsTCstM5obOQgju5ZqSoe-3xjDNtByucFB8JPq-ZK3TPhlhymrq7CLpd-kWN8zSmkL7I416gmV8zbkqM22LE2ddR2IvmFUFlZ9hDWix6in4NG6Ev6Hf3qEf3uXowK2CEwMKUW0ao5uW06mKKgbZ6jFGao4Q_1xhrrp_dkiwujMQXD-jnLZSaAF5wueCuZHjHcb-E_W3ykCyXE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2882111602</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</source><source>Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Politics Collection</source><source>Springer Nature</source><source>PAIS Index</source><source>ProQuest One Literature</source><source>ERIC</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>van Dijk, Esther E. ; Geertsema, Johan ; van der Schaaf, Marieke F. ; van Tartwijk, Jan ; Kluijtmans, Manon</creator><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Esther E. ; Geertsema, Johan ; van der Schaaf, Marieke F. ; van Tartwijk, Jan ; Kluijtmans, Manon</creatorcontrib><description>Disciplinary knowledge lies at the heart of academic work. However, connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as teachers has been a longstanding challenge for (research-intensive) universities. This is reflected in criticism of the practices that aim to support the professional development of university teachers. In order to create better connections, a deeper understanding is needed of how academics’ disciplinary knowledge relates to the development of their teaching. In this paper, we therefore aim to advance theoretical insights about how academics’ disciplinary knowledge connects to their professional development as university teachers. We do so by providing a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Literature discussed as part of the teacher expertise perspective provides insights into how knowledge is structured in order to perform teacher tasks. In our discussion of the teacher knowledge perspective, we include bodies of literature about teachers’ knowledge base to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in how to teach and about powerful knowledge to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in what to teach. Insights from these bodies of literature can, from a teacher knowledge perspective, offer theoretical underpinnings for connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers. Adaptive expertise and practical knowledge are identified as concepts that include elements of both teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Based on the conceptual analysis, we identify and discuss three aspects related to supporting the professional development of university teachers where attention to connection with teachers’ disciplinary knowledge is important.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0018-1560</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-174X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10734-022-00953-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Academic staff ; Academic work ; Academic writing ; College Faculty ; College teachers ; Colleges & universities ; Conceptual analysis ; Criticism ; Education ; Evaluation ; Expertise ; Experts ; Faculty Development ; Higher Education ; Knowledge ; Knowledge base ; Knowledge Level ; Literary criticism ; Methods ; Pedagogical Content Knowledge ; Professional development ; Teacher Attitudes ; Teacher centers ; Teacher Characteristics ; Teacher education ; Teachers ; Teaching ; Teaching Methods ; Training ; University faculty ; Vocational guidance</subject><ispartof>Higher education, 2023-10, Vol.86 (4), p.969-984</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2022</rights><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 Springer</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2022. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6555-5320 ; 0000-0001-6540-408X ; 0000-0001-6804-4163 ; 0000-0003-1983-7380 ; 0000-0001-6601-7639</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2882111602/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2882111602?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,12847,21378,21387,21394,27866,27924,27925,33223,33611,33877,33985,36060,43733,43880,43948,44363,62661,62662,62677,74196,74221,74397,74468,74895</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ1397901$$DView record in ERIC$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Esther E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geertsema, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Schaaf, Marieke F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tartwijk, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluijtmans, Manon</creatorcontrib><title>Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge</title><title>Higher education</title><addtitle>High Educ</addtitle><description>Disciplinary knowledge lies at the heart of academic work. However, connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as teachers has been a longstanding challenge for (research-intensive) universities. This is reflected in criticism of the practices that aim to support the professional development of university teachers. In order to create better connections, a deeper understanding is needed of how academics’ disciplinary knowledge relates to the development of their teaching. In this paper, we therefore aim to advance theoretical insights about how academics’ disciplinary knowledge connects to their professional development as university teachers. We do so by providing a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Literature discussed as part of the teacher expertise perspective provides insights into how knowledge is structured in order to perform teacher tasks. In our discussion of the teacher knowledge perspective, we include bodies of literature about teachers’ knowledge base to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in how to teach and about powerful knowledge to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in what to teach. Insights from these bodies of literature can, from a teacher knowledge perspective, offer theoretical underpinnings for connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers. Adaptive expertise and practical knowledge are identified as concepts that include elements of both teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Based on the conceptual analysis, we identify and discuss three aspects related to supporting the professional development of university teachers where attention to connection with teachers’ disciplinary knowledge is important.</description><subject>Academic staff</subject><subject>Academic work</subject><subject>Academic writing</subject><subject>College Faculty</subject><subject>College teachers</subject><subject>Colleges & universities</subject><subject>Conceptual analysis</subject><subject>Criticism</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Evaluation</subject><subject>Expertise</subject><subject>Experts</subject><subject>Faculty Development</subject><subject>Higher Education</subject><subject>Knowledge</subject><subject>Knowledge base</subject><subject>Knowledge Level</subject><subject>Literary criticism</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Teacher Attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher centers</subject><subject>Teacher Characteristics</subject><subject>Teacher education</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><subject>Teaching</subject><subject>Teaching Methods</subject><subject>Training</subject><subject>University faculty</subject><subject>Vocational guidance</subject><issn>0018-1560</issn><issn>1573-174X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7SW</sourceid><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><sourceid>AIMQZ</sourceid><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>DPSOV</sourceid><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><sourceid>M2L</sourceid><recordid>eNp9UsuKFDEULUTBdvQHBCHgusabRz3ibmjGFwNuFNyFdOqmJmN1Uibp0d75G36Cv-WXmLGcHoTGVcI959znqaqnFE4pQPciUei4qIGxGkA2vGb3qhVtOl7TTny6X60AaF_TpoWH1aOUrgCA0Yavqp_r4D2a7PxItNEDbp1Jv77_IINLxs2T8zruyWcfvk44jEhyIPkSXSRzDBZTcsHriQx4jVOYt-gz0YnsvLvGmFzek4zaXJb_S6KJCd7gnHdFoItqn1wiwd5SCH6bMWaXsKDDIXoo_bh6YPWU8Mnf96T6-Or8w_pNffH-9dv12UVthIRcS0ZB9ry3wpZpBisY18IKwTVsTCstM5obOQgju5ZqSoe-3xjDNtByucFB8JPq-ZK3TPhlhymrq7CLpd-kWN8zSmkL7I416gmV8zbkqM22LE2ddR2IvmFUFlZ9hDWix6in4NG6Ev6Hf3qEf3uXowK2CEwMKUW0ao5uW06mKKgbZ6jFGao4Q_1xhrrp_dkiwujMQXD-jnLZSaAF5wueCuZHjHcb-E_W3ykCyXE</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>van Dijk, Esther E.</creator><creator>Geertsema, Johan</creator><creator>van der Schaaf, Marieke F.</creator><creator>van Tartwijk, Jan</creator><creator>Kluijtmans, Manon</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>7SW</scope><scope>BJH</scope><scope>BNH</scope><scope>BNI</scope><scope>BNJ</scope><scope>BNO</scope><scope>ERI</scope><scope>PET</scope><scope>REK</scope><scope>WWN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AIMQZ</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>DPSOV</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KC-</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>LIQON</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>M2L</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-5320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6540-408X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-4163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-7380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-7639</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge</title><author>van Dijk, Esther E. ; Geertsema, Johan ; van der Schaaf, Marieke F. ; van Tartwijk, Jan ; Kluijtmans, Manon</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Academic staff</topic><topic>Academic work</topic><topic>Academic writing</topic><topic>College Faculty</topic><topic>College teachers</topic><topic>Colleges & universities</topic><topic>Conceptual analysis</topic><topic>Criticism</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Evaluation</topic><topic>Expertise</topic><topic>Experts</topic><topic>Faculty Development</topic><topic>Higher Education</topic><topic>Knowledge</topic><topic>Knowledge base</topic><topic>Knowledge Level</topic><topic>Literary criticism</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Pedagogical Content Knowledge</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Teacher Attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher centers</topic><topic>Teacher Characteristics</topic><topic>Teacher education</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><topic>Teaching</topic><topic>Teaching Methods</topic><topic>Training</topic><topic>University faculty</topic><topic>Vocational guidance</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>van Dijk, Esther E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Geertsema, Johan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van der Schaaf, Marieke F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>van Tartwijk, Jan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kluijtmans, Manon</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer_OA刊</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Ovid)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>ERIC( SilverPlatter )</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>ERIC PlusText (Legacy Platform)</collection><collection>Education Resources Information Center (ERIC)</collection><collection>ERIC</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Literature</collection><collection>Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Politics Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Politics Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>One Literature (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Education Journals</collection><collection>Political Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest_Research Library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>van Dijk, Esther E.</au><au>Geertsema, Johan</au><au>van der Schaaf, Marieke F.</au><au>van Tartwijk, Jan</au><au>Kluijtmans, Manon</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><ericid>EJ1397901</ericid><atitle>Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge</atitle><jtitle>Higher education</jtitle><stitle>High Educ</stitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>969</spage><epage>984</epage><pages>969-984</pages><issn>0018-1560</issn><eissn>1573-174X</eissn><abstract>Disciplinary knowledge lies at the heart of academic work. However, connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as teachers has been a longstanding challenge for (research-intensive) universities. This is reflected in criticism of the practices that aim to support the professional development of university teachers. In order to create better connections, a deeper understanding is needed of how academics’ disciplinary knowledge relates to the development of their teaching. In this paper, we therefore aim to advance theoretical insights about how academics’ disciplinary knowledge connects to their professional development as university teachers. We do so by providing a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Literature discussed as part of the teacher expertise perspective provides insights into how knowledge is structured in order to perform teacher tasks. In our discussion of the teacher knowledge perspective, we include bodies of literature about teachers’ knowledge base to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in how to teach and about powerful knowledge to explore the role of disciplinary knowledge in what to teach. Insights from these bodies of literature can, from a teacher knowledge perspective, offer theoretical underpinnings for connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers. Adaptive expertise and practical knowledge are identified as concepts that include elements of both teacher expertise and teacher knowledge perspectives. Based on the conceptual analysis, we identify and discuss three aspects related to supporting the professional development of university teachers where attention to connection with teachers’ disciplinary knowledge is important.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10734-022-00953-2</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6555-5320</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6540-408X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6804-4163</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1983-7380</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6601-7639</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0018-1560 |
ispartof | Higher education, 2023-10, Vol.86 (4), p.969-984 |
issn | 0018-1560 1573-174X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2882111602 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); ABI/INFORM Global (ProQuest); Social Science Premium Collection; Politics Collection; Springer Nature; PAIS Index; ProQuest One Literature; ERIC; Education Collection |
subjects | Academic staff Academic work Academic writing College Faculty College teachers Colleges & universities Conceptual analysis Criticism Education Evaluation Expertise Experts Faculty Development Higher Education Knowledge Knowledge base Knowledge Level Literary criticism Methods Pedagogical Content Knowledge Professional development Teacher Attitudes Teacher centers Teacher Characteristics Teacher education Teachers Teaching Teaching Methods Training University faculty Vocational guidance |
title | Connecting academics’ disciplinary knowledge to their professional development as university teachers: a conceptual analysis of teacher expertise and teacher knowledge |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T07%3A03%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Connecting%20academics%E2%80%99%20disciplinary%20knowledge%20to%20their%20professional%20development%20as%20university%20teachers:%20a%20conceptual%20analysis%20of%20teacher%20expertise%20and%20teacher%20knowledge&rft.jtitle=Higher%20education&rft.au=van%20Dijk,%20Esther%20E.&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=969&rft.epage=984&rft.pages=969-984&rft.issn=0018-1560&rft.eissn=1573-174X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10734-022-00953-2&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA770485219%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c490t-92109838f4fadedf423a4f443a0bc69f2ca3c9d4c9761a11d88bcc2b0639bed43%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882111602&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A770485219&rft_ericid=EJ1397901&rfr_iscdi=true |