Loading…
Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function
The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in...
Saved in:
Main Authors: | , , |
---|---|
Format: | Conference Proceeding |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 2837 |
creator | Syuriadi, Adi Siswantara, Ahmad Indra Widiawaty, Candra Damis |
description | The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1063/5.0150486 |
format | conference_proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2882584431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2882584431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgThjN-7GUwapQcFPEXUjTBFOmk5hMlfbrndquLlwOl8MF4BajB4wEfeQPCHPElDgDE8w5bqTA4hxMENKsIYx-XoKrWtcIES2lmoCPdue61HtYfbbFDqnA7EtIZWN756HtbbersUKbcxedXXZjN8BZ28LfOHzBH1vif9mn_X6MsO3dEFN_DS6C7aq_OeUULGbPi_a1mb-_vLVP8yZrIRu9tIprSrVgAumVk8Jy5wiWQRDlwopQiVHAQquggyJeSYt5QDhw7phjgk7B3XE2l_S99XUw67Qto3M1RCnCFWMUj9T9kaouDvagZ3KJG1t2BiNzuM1wc7qN_gGiUF7P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2882584431</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creator><contributor>Sudarisman ; Riyanta, Bambang ; Baskoro, Ario S. ; Kamiel, Berli P. ; Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis ; Sudarisman ; Riyanta, Bambang ; Baskoro, Ario S. ; Kamiel, Berli P. ; Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</creatorcontrib><description>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0150486</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Balances (scales) ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Catalysts ; Catalytic converters ; Catalytic cracking ; Cyclone separators ; Fluid catalytic cracking ; Fluid flow ; Nozzles ; Sand</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2837 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sudarisman</contributor><contributor>Riyanta, Bambang</contributor><contributor>Baskoro, Ario S.</contributor><contributor>Kamiel, Berli P.</contributor><contributor>Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</description><subject>Balances (scales)</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Catalytic converters</subject><subject>Catalytic cracking</subject><subject>Cyclone separators</subject><subject>Fluid catalytic cracking</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Sand</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgThjN-7GUwapQcFPEXUjTBFOmk5hMlfbrndquLlwOl8MF4BajB4wEfeQPCHPElDgDE8w5bqTA4hxMENKsIYx-XoKrWtcIES2lmoCPdue61HtYfbbFDqnA7EtIZWN756HtbbersUKbcxedXXZjN8BZ28LfOHzBH1vif9mn_X6MsO3dEFN_DS6C7aq_OeUULGbPi_a1mb-_vLVP8yZrIRu9tIprSrVgAumVk8Jy5wiWQRDlwopQiVHAQquggyJeSYt5QDhw7phjgk7B3XE2l_S99XUw67Qto3M1RCnCFWMUj9T9kaouDvagZ3KJG1t2BiNzuM1wc7qN_gGiUF7P</recordid><startdate>20231027</startdate><enddate>20231027</enddate><creator>Syuriadi, Adi</creator><creator>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creator><creator>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231027</creationdate><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><author>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Balances (scales)</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Catalytic converters</topic><topic>Catalytic cracking</topic><topic>Cyclone separators</topic><topic>Fluid catalytic cracking</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Sand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Syuriadi, Adi</au><au>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</au><au>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</au><au>Sudarisman</au><au>Riyanta, Bambang</au><au>Baskoro, Ario S.</au><au>Kamiel, Berli P.</au><au>Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2023-10-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2837</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0150486</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0094-243X |
ispartof | AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2837 (1) |
issn | 0094-243X 1551-7616 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2882584431 |
source | American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list) |
subjects | Balances (scales) Biodiesel fuels Biofuels Catalysts Catalytic converters Catalytic cracking Cyclone separators Fluid catalytic cracking Fluid flow Nozzles Sand |
title | Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Cyclone%20separator%20performance%20analysis%20applicable%20at%20FCC%20with%20variable%20nozzle%20function&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Syuriadi,%20Adi&rft.date=2023-10-27&rft.volume=2837&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0150486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2882584431%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882584431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |