Loading…

Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function

The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Syuriadi, Adi, Siswantara, Ahmad Indra, Widiawaty, Candra Damis
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title
container_volume 2837
creator Syuriadi, Adi
Siswantara, Ahmad Indra
Widiawaty, Candra Damis
description The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.
doi_str_mv 10.1063/5.0150486
format conference_proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_scita</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2882584431</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2882584431</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgThjN-7GUwapQcFPEXUjTBFOmk5hMlfbrndquLlwOl8MF4BajB4wEfeQPCHPElDgDE8w5bqTA4hxMENKsIYx-XoKrWtcIES2lmoCPdue61HtYfbbFDqnA7EtIZWN756HtbbersUKbcxedXXZjN8BZ28LfOHzBH1vif9mn_X6MsO3dEFN_DS6C7aq_OeUULGbPi_a1mb-_vLVP8yZrIRu9tIprSrVgAumVk8Jy5wiWQRDlwopQiVHAQquggyJeSYt5QDhw7phjgk7B3XE2l_S99XUw67Qto3M1RCnCFWMUj9T9kaouDvagZ3KJG1t2BiNzuM1wc7qN_gGiUF7P</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><pqid>2882584431</pqid></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><source>American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)</source><creator>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creator><contributor>Sudarisman ; Riyanta, Bambang ; Baskoro, Ario S. ; Kamiel, Berli P. ; Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis ; Sudarisman ; Riyanta, Bambang ; Baskoro, Ario S. ; Kamiel, Berli P. ; Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</creatorcontrib><description>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-243X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1551-7616</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1063/5.0150486</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APCPCS</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Melville: American Institute of Physics</publisher><subject>Balances (scales) ; Biodiesel fuels ; Biofuels ; Catalysts ; Catalytic converters ; Catalytic cracking ; Cyclone separators ; Fluid catalytic cracking ; Fluid flow ; Nozzles ; Sand</subject><ispartof>AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2837 (1)</ispartof><rights>Author(s)</rights><rights>2023 Author(s). Published by AIP Publishing.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Sudarisman</contributor><contributor>Riyanta, Bambang</contributor><contributor>Baskoro, Ario S.</contributor><contributor>Kamiel, Berli P.</contributor><contributor>Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</contributor><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creatorcontrib><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><title>AIP conference proceedings</title><description>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</description><subject>Balances (scales)</subject><subject>Biodiesel fuels</subject><subject>Biofuels</subject><subject>Catalysts</subject><subject>Catalytic converters</subject><subject>Catalytic cracking</subject><subject>Cyclone separators</subject><subject>Fluid catalytic cracking</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Sand</subject><issn>0094-243X</issn><issn>1551-7616</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkMtKAzEARYMoWKsL_yDgThjN-7GUwapQcFPEXUjTBFOmk5hMlfbrndquLlwOl8MF4BajB4wEfeQPCHPElDgDE8w5bqTA4hxMENKsIYx-XoKrWtcIES2lmoCPdue61HtYfbbFDqnA7EtIZWN756HtbbersUKbcxedXXZjN8BZ28LfOHzBH1vif9mn_X6MsO3dEFN_DS6C7aq_OeUULGbPi_a1mb-_vLVP8yZrIRu9tIprSrVgAumVk8Jy5wiWQRDlwopQiVHAQquggyJeSYt5QDhw7phjgk7B3XE2l_S99XUw67Qto3M1RCnCFWMUj9T9kaouDvagZ3KJG1t2BiNzuM1wc7qN_gGiUF7P</recordid><startdate>20231027</startdate><enddate>20231027</enddate><creator>Syuriadi, Adi</creator><creator>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creator><creator>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creator><general>American Institute of Physics</general><scope>8FD</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>L7M</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231027</creationdate><title>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</title><author>Syuriadi, Adi ; Siswantara, Ahmad Indra ; Widiawaty, Candra Damis</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Balances (scales)</topic><topic>Biodiesel fuels</topic><topic>Biofuels</topic><topic>Catalysts</topic><topic>Catalytic converters</topic><topic>Catalytic cracking</topic><topic>Cyclone separators</topic><topic>Fluid catalytic cracking</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Sand</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Syuriadi, Adi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</creatorcontrib><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Syuriadi, Adi</au><au>Siswantara, Ahmad Indra</au><au>Widiawaty, Candra Damis</au><au>Sudarisman</au><au>Riyanta, Bambang</au><au>Baskoro, Ario S.</au><au>Kamiel, Berli P.</au><au>Nurkholid, Muhammad Ahdan Fawwaz</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function</atitle><btitle>AIP conference proceedings</btitle><date>2023-10-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2837</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>0094-243X</issn><eissn>1551-7616</eissn><coden>APCPCS</coden><abstract>The topic of this research is renewable energy, biofuels are converted into biogasoline in FCC (Fluid Catalytic Cracking). As known, climate change occurs because of exhaust emissions in the environment. The solution is used biofuels. This biofuel is biogasoline from cooking oil catalytic process in FCC. In 2020, testing at the FCC yielded less than 10% biogasoline. Therefore, it is necessary to improve FCC equipment performance, cyclone separator which functions to separate biogasoline vapor from the catalyst. The higher separation is better quality of biogasoline vapor. The goal is to analyze the cyclone separator performance. The methodology is compared cyclone separator with and without a nozzle (variable nozzle function) on the catalyst inlet side. The catalyst used is sand with a mesh of 60 then weighed 10 grams. The sand was flowed and then pushed by air to the cyclone separator. In a cyclone separator there will be turbulent flow, and the heavy sand mass would descend to the lower outlet side, while the light sand mass would exit towards the upper outlet. The sand that comes out of the cyclone separator is then weighed using digital scales. The results of this test are that in a cyclone separator that uses nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst, the performance is obtained by 67%, while without nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst it is 75%. Conclusions, the cyclone separator with better performance is the one without using a nozzle on the inlet side of the catalyst.</abstract><cop>Melville</cop><pub>American Institute of Physics</pub><doi>10.1063/5.0150486</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-243X
ispartof AIP conference proceedings, 2023, Vol.2837 (1)
issn 0094-243X
1551-7616
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2882584431
source American Institute of Physics:Jisc Collections:Transitional Journals Agreement 2021-23 (Reading list)
subjects Balances (scales)
Biodiesel fuels
Biofuels
Catalysts
Catalytic converters
Catalytic cracking
Cyclone separators
Fluid catalytic cracking
Fluid flow
Nozzles
Sand
title Cyclone separator performance analysis applicable at FCC with variable nozzle function
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T13%3A20%3A52IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_scita&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Cyclone%20separator%20performance%20analysis%20applicable%20at%20FCC%20with%20variable%20nozzle%20function&rft.btitle=AIP%20conference%20proceedings&rft.au=Syuriadi,%20Adi&rft.date=2023-10-27&rft.volume=2837&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=0094-243X&rft.eissn=1551-7616&rft.coden=APCPCS&rft_id=info:doi/10.1063/5.0150486&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_scita%3E2882584431%3C/proquest_scita%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p967-9ba85933964609dc76a5cc217f628cfd23710f1698f9f82e87a15f01f55c4c463%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2882584431&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true