Loading…
Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic
Course evaluations are one of the tools that a university and its faculty may use to gather information about students’ attitudes toward the quality of the courses they offer. The present study focused on an often neglected factor of course evaluations. Namely, their potential sensitivity to the tem...
Saved in:
Published in: | The international journal of assessment and evaluation 2023, Vol.31 (1), p.37-52 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 52 |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 37 |
container_title | The international journal of assessment and evaluation |
container_volume | 31 |
creator | Pilotti, Maura Abdelsalam, Hanadi El Alaoui, Khadija Al-Mulhem, Huda |
description | Course evaluations are one of the tools that a university and its faculty may use to gather information about students’ attitudes toward the quality of the courses they offer. The present study focused on an often neglected factor of course evaluations. Namely, their potential sensitivity to the temporal context in which they occur. Thus, we asked whether students’ response rates in course evaluations and resulting ratings have changed across three time intervals: before, during, and after the pandemic. The study examined the responses of an understudied population of female college students from Saudi Arabia. The country’s gender-equity alignment, which had been guided by efforts to restructure the economy of the country, took a temporary respite during the pandemic, thereby making female students’ responses a potential indicator of their sense of agency over time. After finding consistent declines in participation from the pre-pandemic period, but no change in ratings, we questioned whether course evaluations were sensitive and valid measures of changes in students’ opinions about their learning in an academic setting. Informal queries indicated that students did not often see the utility of course evaluations, explaining their modest response rates, and used them to express polarized feelings, suggesting that students with moderate attitudes might elude participation. As such, course evaluations were deemed poor measures of participants’ sense of agency. |
doi_str_mv | 10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v31i01/37-52 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2884489597</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2884489597</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1130-304956780a8e8bf45103cdbd2cc0c277288f01cde41ee64c1ea076c416f6f1973</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkN1OwkAQhRujiQR5h024pbJ_7W71wtSqQEIiiXq9KdsplMAWd7ca7nwNX88nsQXmZuZkzpxJviAYEnxLpORyTBkVoUgoHmeTxfiLkQqTMRNhRC-C3nEp44RenufOeB0MnNvgtmQcU0F6gZnmDqXm4NeVWaFsnZsVFA93KKu3W1gBevNNAca7v59flHpfddIhX3_ntkAz47xttK9qgx6hrC2M0FNj26QRyk2B0tKDRX4NaNFK2FX6Jrgq862Dwbn3g4-X5_dsGs5fJ7MsnYeaEIZDhnkSxULiXIJcljwimOliWVCtsaZCUClLTHQBnADEXBPIsYg1J3EZlyQRrB8MT7l7W3824Lza1I017UvV3nIuk-jouj-5tK2ds1Cqva12uT0ogtWRserQqQ6dahmrE2PFhIoo-we-k3E3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2884489597</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic</title><source>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</source><source>Education Collection</source><creator>Pilotti, Maura ; Abdelsalam, Hanadi ; El Alaoui, Khadija ; Al-Mulhem, Huda</creator><creatorcontrib>Pilotti, Maura ; Abdelsalam, Hanadi ; El Alaoui, Khadija ; Al-Mulhem, Huda</creatorcontrib><description>Course evaluations are one of the tools that a university and its faculty may use to gather information about students’ attitudes toward the quality of the courses they offer. The present study focused on an often neglected factor of course evaluations. Namely, their potential sensitivity to the temporal context in which they occur. Thus, we asked whether students’ response rates in course evaluations and resulting ratings have changed across three time intervals: before, during, and after the pandemic. The study examined the responses of an understudied population of female college students from Saudi Arabia. The country’s gender-equity alignment, which had been guided by efforts to restructure the economy of the country, took a temporary respite during the pandemic, thereby making female students’ responses a potential indicator of their sense of agency over time. After finding consistent declines in participation from the pre-pandemic period, but no change in ratings, we questioned whether course evaluations were sensitive and valid measures of changes in students’ opinions about their learning in an academic setting. Informal queries indicated that students did not often see the utility of course evaluations, explaining their modest response rates, and used them to express polarized feelings, suggesting that students with moderate attitudes might elude participation. As such, course evaluations were deemed poor measures of participants’ sense of agency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2327-7920</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2327-8692</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v31i01/37-52</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Champaign: Common Ground Research Networks</publisher><subject>College students ; Feedback (Response) ; Pandemics ; Pedagogy ; Response rates ; Student attitudes ; Teacher evaluations</subject><ispartof>The international journal of assessment and evaluation, 2023, Vol.31 (1), p.37-52</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023, Common Ground Research Networks, All Rights Reserved</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-7955-680X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2884489597?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4022,21377,21393,27922,27923,27924,33610,33876,43732,43879</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Pilotti, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelsalam, Hanadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Alaoui, Khadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mulhem, Huda</creatorcontrib><title>Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic</title><title>The international journal of assessment and evaluation</title><description>Course evaluations are one of the tools that a university and its faculty may use to gather information about students’ attitudes toward the quality of the courses they offer. The present study focused on an often neglected factor of course evaluations. Namely, their potential sensitivity to the temporal context in which they occur. Thus, we asked whether students’ response rates in course evaluations and resulting ratings have changed across three time intervals: before, during, and after the pandemic. The study examined the responses of an understudied population of female college students from Saudi Arabia. The country’s gender-equity alignment, which had been guided by efforts to restructure the economy of the country, took a temporary respite during the pandemic, thereby making female students’ responses a potential indicator of their sense of agency over time. After finding consistent declines in participation from the pre-pandemic period, but no change in ratings, we questioned whether course evaluations were sensitive and valid measures of changes in students’ opinions about their learning in an academic setting. Informal queries indicated that students did not often see the utility of course evaluations, explaining their modest response rates, and used them to express polarized feelings, suggesting that students with moderate attitudes might elude participation. As such, course evaluations were deemed poor measures of participants’ sense of agency.</description><subject>College students</subject><subject>Feedback (Response)</subject><subject>Pandemics</subject><subject>Pedagogy</subject><subject>Response rates</subject><subject>Student attitudes</subject><subject>Teacher evaluations</subject><issn>2327-7920</issn><issn>2327-8692</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>ALSLI</sourceid><sourceid>CJNVE</sourceid><sourceid>M0P</sourceid><recordid>eNotkN1OwkAQhRujiQR5h024pbJ_7W71wtSqQEIiiXq9KdsplMAWd7ca7nwNX88nsQXmZuZkzpxJviAYEnxLpORyTBkVoUgoHmeTxfiLkQqTMRNhRC-C3nEp44RenufOeB0MnNvgtmQcU0F6gZnmDqXm4NeVWaFsnZsVFA93KKu3W1gBevNNAca7v59flHpfddIhX3_ntkAz47xttK9qgx6hrC2M0FNj26QRyk2B0tKDRX4NaNFK2FX6Jrgq862Dwbn3g4-X5_dsGs5fJ7MsnYeaEIZDhnkSxULiXIJcljwimOliWVCtsaZCUClLTHQBnADEXBPIsYg1J3EZlyQRrB8MT7l7W3824Lza1I017UvV3nIuk-jouj-5tK2ds1Cqva12uT0ogtWRserQqQ6dahmrE2PFhIoo-we-k3E3</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Pilotti, Maura</creator><creator>Abdelsalam, Hanadi</creator><creator>El Alaoui, Khadija</creator><creator>Al-Mulhem, Huda</creator><general>Common Ground Research Networks</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0-V</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88B</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ALSLI</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CJNVE</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>M0P</scope><scope>PQEDU</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7955-680X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic</title><author>Pilotti, Maura ; Abdelsalam, Hanadi ; El Alaoui, Khadija ; Al-Mulhem, Huda</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1130-304956780a8e8bf45103cdbd2cc0c277288f01cde41ee64c1ea076c416f6f1973</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>College students</topic><topic>Feedback (Response)</topic><topic>Pandemics</topic><topic>Pedagogy</topic><topic>Response rates</topic><topic>Student attitudes</topic><topic>Teacher evaluations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Pilotti, Maura</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abdelsalam, Hanadi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>El Alaoui, Khadija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Al-Mulhem, Huda</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Sciences Premium Collection【Remote access available】</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Education Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Education Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Education Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Education</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>The international journal of assessment and evaluation</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Pilotti, Maura</au><au>Abdelsalam, Hanadi</au><au>El Alaoui, Khadija</au><au>Al-Mulhem, Huda</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic</atitle><jtitle>The international journal of assessment and evaluation</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>31</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>37</spage><epage>52</epage><pages>37-52</pages><issn>2327-7920</issn><eissn>2327-8692</eissn><abstract>Course evaluations are one of the tools that a university and its faculty may use to gather information about students’ attitudes toward the quality of the courses they offer. The present study focused on an often neglected factor of course evaluations. Namely, their potential sensitivity to the temporal context in which they occur. Thus, we asked whether students’ response rates in course evaluations and resulting ratings have changed across three time intervals: before, during, and after the pandemic. The study examined the responses of an understudied population of female college students from Saudi Arabia. The country’s gender-equity alignment, which had been guided by efforts to restructure the economy of the country, took a temporary respite during the pandemic, thereby making female students’ responses a potential indicator of their sense of agency over time. After finding consistent declines in participation from the pre-pandemic period, but no change in ratings, we questioned whether course evaluations were sensitive and valid measures of changes in students’ opinions about their learning in an academic setting. Informal queries indicated that students did not often see the utility of course evaluations, explaining their modest response rates, and used them to express polarized feelings, suggesting that students with moderate attitudes might elude participation. As such, course evaluations were deemed poor measures of participants’ sense of agency.</abstract><cop>Champaign</cop><pub>Common Ground Research Networks</pub><doi>10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v31i01/37-52</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7955-680X</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2327-7920 |
ispartof | The international journal of assessment and evaluation, 2023, Vol.31 (1), p.37-52 |
issn | 2327-7920 2327-8692 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2884489597 |
source | ProQuest Social Science Premium Collection; Education Collection |
subjects | College students Feedback (Response) Pandemics Pedagogy Response rates Student attitudes Teacher evaluations |
title | Has Anything Changed?: College Students’ Attitudes toward Instruction Before, During, and After the Pandemic |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T08%3A18%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Has%20Anything%20Changed?:%20College%20Students%E2%80%99%20Attitudes%20toward%20Instruction%20Before,%20During,%20and%20After%20the%20Pandemic&rft.jtitle=The%20international%20journal%20of%20assessment%20and%20evaluation&rft.au=Pilotti,%20Maura&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=31&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=37&rft.epage=52&rft.pages=37-52&rft.issn=2327-7920&rft.eissn=2327-8692&rft_id=info:doi/10.18848/2327-7920/CGP/v31i01/37-52&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2884489597%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1130-304956780a8e8bf45103cdbd2cc0c277288f01cde41ee64c1ea076c416f6f1973%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2884489597&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |