Loading…

English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities

This article reports on two quantitative studies of English learners' (ELs) interactions with constructed-response items from a Grade 5 state science test. Study 1 investigated the relationships between the constructed-response item-level variables of English Reading Demand, English Writing Dem...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Educational assessment 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.246-272
Main Authors: Noble, Tracy, Wells, Craig S., Rosebery, Ann S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c124301d33286738010c0cde0048013bca8372fff2d7c9709e4721661a22797a3
container_end_page 272
container_issue 4
container_start_page 246
container_title Educational assessment
container_volume 28
creator Noble, Tracy
Wells, Craig S.
Rosebery, Ann S.
description This article reports on two quantitative studies of English learners' (ELs) interactions with constructed-response items from a Grade 5 state science test. Study 1 investigated the relationships between the constructed-response item-level variables of English Reading Demand, English Writing Demand, and Background Knowledge Demand and the performance of ELs vs. non-ELs on those items. English Writing Demand was the strongest predictor of Differential Item Functioning favoring non-ELs over ELs for constructed-response items. In Study 2, we investigated the student-level variable of English language proficiency level and found that lower English language proficiency was related to greatly increased odds of omitting a response to a constructed-response item, even when controlling for science proficiency. These findings challenge the validity of scores on constructed-response test items as measures of ELs' science proficiency.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/10627197.2023.2226387
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889492531</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889492531</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c124301d33286738010c0cde0048013bca8372fff2d7c9709e4721661a22797a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQSj43JncdE37phT_DAYDnQ8-hZjebh1dUpMU2bc3o_PVp3sunHPu5UfILaMzRgt6z2gOgpViBhT4DAByXogzMmFzDmleCnEedfSkR9MlufJ-RykVeQkT8vlkNl3rt8kSlTPofKJMnVTW-OAGHbBO39D3ccXkXbdoNCZr9CFZBNz7pNqqrkOzwTG26nvrwmDa0KK_JheN6jzenOaUfDw_ravXdLl6WVSPy1RDkYdUM8g4ZTXncRW8oIxqqmukNIuaf2lVcAFN00AtdCloiZkAludMAYhSKD4ld2Nv7-z3EH-TOzs4E09KKIoyK2HOWXTNR5d21nuHjexdu1fuIBmVR4ryj6I8UpQnijH3MOZa01i3Vz_WdbUM6tBZ1zhldOsl_7_iFx0rd_Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889492531</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities</title><source>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Noble, Tracy ; Wells, Craig S. ; Rosebery, Ann S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Noble, Tracy ; Wells, Craig S. ; Rosebery, Ann S.</creatorcontrib><description>This article reports on two quantitative studies of English learners' (ELs) interactions with constructed-response items from a Grade 5 state science test. Study 1 investigated the relationships between the constructed-response item-level variables of English Reading Demand, English Writing Demand, and Background Knowledge Demand and the performance of ELs vs. non-ELs on those items. English Writing Demand was the strongest predictor of Differential Item Functioning favoring non-ELs over ELs for constructed-response items. In Study 2, we investigated the student-level variable of English language proficiency level and found that lower English language proficiency was related to greatly increased odds of omitting a response to a constructed-response item, even when controlling for science proficiency. These findings challenge the validity of scores on constructed-response test items as measures of ELs' science proficiency.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1062-7197</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1532-6977</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10627197.2023.2226387</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Philadelphia: Routledge</publisher><subject>Assessment ; Constructed Response ; Educational evaluation ; Elementary school students ; English as a second language ; English as a second language learning ; English proficiency ; Language proficiency ; Large-scale Assessment ; Quantitative analysis ; Reading-writing relationship ; Science education</subject><ispartof>Educational assessment, 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.246-272</ispartof><rights>2023 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC 2023</rights><rights>2023 Taylor &amp; Francis Group, LLC</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c124301d33286738010c0cde0048013bca8372fff2d7c9709e4721661a22797a3</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-6367-4190</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,31269</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Noble, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Craig S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebery, Ann S.</creatorcontrib><title>English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities</title><title>Educational assessment</title><description>This article reports on two quantitative studies of English learners' (ELs) interactions with constructed-response items from a Grade 5 state science test. Study 1 investigated the relationships between the constructed-response item-level variables of English Reading Demand, English Writing Demand, and Background Knowledge Demand and the performance of ELs vs. non-ELs on those items. English Writing Demand was the strongest predictor of Differential Item Functioning favoring non-ELs over ELs for constructed-response items. In Study 2, we investigated the student-level variable of English language proficiency level and found that lower English language proficiency was related to greatly increased odds of omitting a response to a constructed-response item, even when controlling for science proficiency. These findings challenge the validity of scores on constructed-response test items as measures of ELs' science proficiency.</description><subject>Assessment</subject><subject>Constructed Response</subject><subject>Educational evaluation</subject><subject>Elementary school students</subject><subject>English as a second language</subject><subject>English as a second language learning</subject><subject>English proficiency</subject><subject>Language proficiency</subject><subject>Large-scale Assessment</subject><subject>Quantitative analysis</subject><subject>Reading-writing relationship</subject><subject>Science education</subject><issn>1062-7197</issn><issn>1532-6977</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7T9</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kF9LwzAUxYMoOKcfQSj43JncdE37phT_DAYDnQ8-hZjebh1dUpMU2bc3o_PVp3sunHPu5UfILaMzRgt6z2gOgpViBhT4DAByXogzMmFzDmleCnEedfSkR9MlufJ-RykVeQkT8vlkNl3rt8kSlTPofKJMnVTW-OAGHbBO39D3ccXkXbdoNCZr9CFZBNz7pNqqrkOzwTG26nvrwmDa0KK_JheN6jzenOaUfDw_ravXdLl6WVSPy1RDkYdUM8g4ZTXncRW8oIxqqmukNIuaf2lVcAFN00AtdCloiZkAludMAYhSKD4ld2Nv7-z3EH-TOzs4E09KKIoyK2HOWXTNR5d21nuHjexdu1fuIBmVR4ryj6I8UpQnijH3MOZa01i3Vz_WdbUM6tBZ1zhldOsl_7_iFx0rd_Y</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Noble, Tracy</creator><creator>Wells, Craig S.</creator><creator>Rosebery, Ann S.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7T9</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-4190</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities</title><author>Noble, Tracy ; Wells, Craig S. ; Rosebery, Ann S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c124301d33286738010c0cde0048013bca8372fff2d7c9709e4721661a22797a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Assessment</topic><topic>Constructed Response</topic><topic>Educational evaluation</topic><topic>Elementary school students</topic><topic>English as a second language</topic><topic>English as a second language learning</topic><topic>English proficiency</topic><topic>Language proficiency</topic><topic>Large-scale Assessment</topic><topic>Quantitative analysis</topic><topic>Reading-writing relationship</topic><topic>Science education</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Noble, Tracy</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wells, Craig S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosebery, Ann S.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA)</collection><jtitle>Educational assessment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Noble, Tracy</au><au>Wells, Craig S.</au><au>Rosebery, Ann S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities</atitle><jtitle>Educational assessment</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>246</spage><epage>272</epage><pages>246-272</pages><issn>1062-7197</issn><eissn>1532-6977</eissn><abstract>This article reports on two quantitative studies of English learners' (ELs) interactions with constructed-response items from a Grade 5 state science test. Study 1 investigated the relationships between the constructed-response item-level variables of English Reading Demand, English Writing Demand, and Background Knowledge Demand and the performance of ELs vs. non-ELs on those items. English Writing Demand was the strongest predictor of Differential Item Functioning favoring non-ELs over ELs for constructed-response items. In Study 2, we investigated the student-level variable of English language proficiency level and found that lower English language proficiency was related to greatly increased odds of omitting a response to a constructed-response item, even when controlling for science proficiency. These findings challenge the validity of scores on constructed-response test items as measures of ELs' science proficiency.</abstract><cop>Philadelphia</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/10627197.2023.2226387</doi><tpages>27</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6367-4190</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1062-7197
ispartof Educational assessment, 2023-10, Vol.28 (4), p.246-272
issn 1062-7197
1532-6977
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2889492531
source Linguistics and Language Behavior Abstracts (LLBA); Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection
subjects Assessment
Constructed Response
Educational evaluation
Elementary school students
English as a second language
English as a second language learning
English proficiency
Language proficiency
Large-scale Assessment
Quantitative analysis
Reading-writing relationship
Science education
title English Learners and Constructed-Response Science Test Items Challenges and Opportunities
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T09%3A13%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=English%20Learners%20and%20Constructed-Response%20Science%20Test%20Items%20Challenges%20and%20Opportunities&rft.jtitle=Educational%20assessment&rft.au=Noble,%20Tracy&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=246&rft.epage=272&rft.pages=246-272&rft.issn=1062-7197&rft.eissn=1532-6977&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10627197.2023.2226387&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889492531%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c286t-c124301d33286738010c0cde0048013bca8372fff2d7c9709e4721661a22797a3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889492531&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true