Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review

Theories and theorizing are central to scholarship on public administration (PA). Only a few attempts have been made to review the theories applied in PA broadly and systematically, to take stock of the theoretical repertoire, and to engage scholars in critical reflection on how they “do” theorizing...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Public administration review 2023-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1542-1563
Main Authors: Hattke, Fabian, Vogel, Rick
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Bibliometrics
Public administration
Schism
Scholarship
Systematic review
Theory
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923
container_end_page 1563
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1542
container_title Public administration review
container_volume 83
creator Hattke, Fabian
Vogel, Rick
description Theories and theorizing are central to scholarship on public administration (PA). Only a few attempts have been made to review the theories applied in PA broadly and systematically, to take stock of the theoretical repertoire, and to engage scholars in critical reflection on how they “do” theorizing. This study analyzes the theoretical landscape of PA scholarship with a novel combination of bibliometrics and natural language processing. A “tree of theories” shows how 150 theories merge into one body of scholarship, with 15 theories at the core. The theories vary considerably in terms of disciplinary background, methodological choices, geographical settings, author diversity, and reach beyond academia. While the results indicate the plurality and vitality of the field, they also raise concerns about how core theories show limited geographical dispersion and low societal relevance. These concerns are further fueled by an apparent schism between micro and macro theories.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/puar.13730
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2889825539</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2889825539</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX70LAm7A1H5tN4q2U-gEFRdpzyGazmtJu1mTXUv96d7sKnpzLzIPfmxkeAJcYTXBXt3WrwwRTTtERGGGWoiQjGB3_mU_BWYxrhDDBqRiB-fLd-uBshLoqYHMQX656g66CdZtvnIG62LrKxSboxvnqDk5h3MfGbjtpYLCfzu7OwUmpN9Fe_PQxWN3Pl7PHZPH88DSbLhJDmUQJz2xqkTC5JKL7scQ44xLltOQ8NzTViBWolJoLWWSCsYykpihQijkXtGSS0DG4HvbWwX-0NjZq7dtQdScVEUIKwhiVHXUzUCb4GIMtVR3cVoe9wkj1Mak-JnWIqYPxAO_cxu7_IdXLavr667kaPNb4LhnVt9j40D9BCKXfH71zEQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2889825539</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review</title><source>EconLit s plnými texty</source><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Wiley</source><source>Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Hattke, Fabian ; Vogel, Rick</creator><creatorcontrib>Hattke, Fabian ; Vogel, Rick</creatorcontrib><description>Theories and theorizing are central to scholarship on public administration (PA). Only a few attempts have been made to review the theories applied in PA broadly and systematically, to take stock of the theoretical repertoire, and to engage scholars in critical reflection on how they “do” theorizing. This study analyzes the theoretical landscape of PA scholarship with a novel combination of bibliometrics and natural language processing. A “tree of theories” shows how 150 theories merge into one body of scholarship, with 15 theories at the core. The theories vary considerably in terms of disciplinary background, methodological choices, geographical settings, author diversity, and reach beyond academia. While the results indicate the plurality and vitality of the field, they also raise concerns about how core theories show limited geographical dispersion and low societal relevance. These concerns are further fueled by an apparent schism between micro and macro theories.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 0033-3352</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6210</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/puar.13730</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken, USA: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</publisher><subject>Bibliometrics ; Public administration ; Schism ; Scholarship ; Systematic review ; Theory</subject><ispartof>Public administration review, 2023-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1542-1563</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Public Administration.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-1361-5085 ; 0000-0003-3673-2855</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hattke, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Rick</creatorcontrib><title>Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review</title><title>Public administration review</title><description>Theories and theorizing are central to scholarship on public administration (PA). Only a few attempts have been made to review the theories applied in PA broadly and systematically, to take stock of the theoretical repertoire, and to engage scholars in critical reflection on how they “do” theorizing. This study analyzes the theoretical landscape of PA scholarship with a novel combination of bibliometrics and natural language processing. A “tree of theories” shows how 150 theories merge into one body of scholarship, with 15 theories at the core. The theories vary considerably in terms of disciplinary background, methodological choices, geographical settings, author diversity, and reach beyond academia. While the results indicate the plurality and vitality of the field, they also raise concerns about how core theories show limited geographical dispersion and low societal relevance. These concerns are further fueled by an apparent schism between micro and macro theories.</description><subject>Bibliometrics</subject><subject>Public administration</subject><subject>Schism</subject><subject>Scholarship</subject><subject>Systematic review</subject><subject>Theory</subject><issn>1540-6210</issn><issn>0033-3352</issn><issn>1540-6210</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kM1LAzEQxYMoWKsX70LAm7A1H5tN4q2U-gEFRdpzyGazmtJu1mTXUv96d7sKnpzLzIPfmxkeAJcYTXBXt3WrwwRTTtERGGGWoiQjGB3_mU_BWYxrhDDBqRiB-fLd-uBshLoqYHMQX656g66CdZtvnIG62LrKxSboxvnqDk5h3MfGbjtpYLCfzu7OwUmpN9Fe_PQxWN3Pl7PHZPH88DSbLhJDmUQJz2xqkTC5JKL7scQ44xLltOQ8NzTViBWolJoLWWSCsYykpihQijkXtGSS0DG4HvbWwX-0NjZq7dtQdScVEUIKwhiVHXUzUCb4GIMtVR3cVoe9wkj1Mak-JnWIqYPxAO_cxu7_IdXLavr667kaPNb4LhnVt9j40D9BCKXfH71zEQ</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Hattke, Fabian</creator><creator>Vogel, Rick</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</general><general>American Society for Public Administration</general><scope>OT2</scope><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>K9.</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-5085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3673-2855</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review</title><author>Hattke, Fabian ; Vogel, Rick</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Bibliometrics</topic><topic>Public administration</topic><topic>Schism</topic><topic>Scholarship</topic><topic>Systematic review</topic><topic>Theory</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hattke, Fabian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vogel, Rick</creatorcontrib><collection>EconStor</collection><collection>Wiley_OA刊</collection><collection>Wiley-Blackwell Free Backfiles(OpenAccess)</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hattke, Fabian</au><au>Vogel, Rick</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review</atitle><jtitle>Public administration review</jtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>83</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1542</spage><epage>1563</epage><pages>1542-1563</pages><issn>1540-6210</issn><issn>0033-3352</issn><eissn>1540-6210</eissn><abstract>Theories and theorizing are central to scholarship on public administration (PA). Only a few attempts have been made to review the theories applied in PA broadly and systematically, to take stock of the theoretical repertoire, and to engage scholars in critical reflection on how they “do” theorizing. This study analyzes the theoretical landscape of PA scholarship with a novel combination of bibliometrics and natural language processing. A “tree of theories” shows how 150 theories merge into one body of scholarship, with 15 theories at the core. The theories vary considerably in terms of disciplinary background, methodological choices, geographical settings, author diversity, and reach beyond academia. While the results indicate the plurality and vitality of the field, they also raise concerns about how core theories show limited geographical dispersion and low societal relevance. These concerns are further fueled by an apparent schism between micro and macro theories.</abstract><cop>Hoboken, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/puar.13730</doi><tpages>22</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1361-5085</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3673-2855</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1540-6210
ispartof Public administration review, 2023-11, Vol.83 (6), p.1542-1563
issn 1540-6210
0033-3352
1540-6210
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2889825539
source EconLit s plnými texty; International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Wiley; Access via Business Source (EBSCOhost); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects Bibliometrics
Public administration
Schism
Scholarship
Systematic review
Theory
title Theories and theorizing in public administration: A systematic review
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-25T08%3A05%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Theories%20and%20theorizing%20in%20public%20administration:%20A%20systematic%20review&rft.jtitle=Public%20administration%20review&rft.au=Hattke,%20Fabian&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=83&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1542&rft.epage=1563&rft.pages=1542-1563&rft.issn=1540-6210&rft.eissn=1540-6210&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/puar.13730&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2889825539%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3590-76e4e08cb928373f116790b3f77bc34a05d0f9a789d6855624cdd0417783f5923%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2889825539&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true