Loading…

Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art

Abstract Cosmopolitanism seeks a political ethics of world togetherness and a political aesthetics that can contribute to this task critically and imaginatively. Regarding political ethics, I explore the world as a “cosmopolitan mind” composed of “dialogic voices” and threatened by neoliberalism, ne...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism 2023-08, Vol.81 (2), p.213-227
Main Author: Evans, Fred
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3
container_end_page 227
container_issue 2
container_start_page 213
container_title The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism
container_volume 81
creator Evans, Fred
description Abstract Cosmopolitanism seeks a political ethics of world togetherness and a political aesthetics that can contribute to this task critically and imaginatively. Regarding political ethics, I explore the world as a “cosmopolitan mind” composed of “dialogic voices” and threatened by neoliberalism, neofascism, and other nihilistic “oracles.” I also construct a criterion for determining which public artworks (1) resist oracles and (2) help us imagine a “cosmopolitan democracy” and its political ethics. The latter includes the concordance of three ethico-political virtues—solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity (creating new voices through the interplay among other voices)—and must appeal to different peoples worldwide. I also examine how this political ethics and aesthetics can be applied to nonhuman life and non-sentient formations in a non-anthropocentric manner; indeed, how the cosmos in its entirety and plurality can also be thought of as voices and participants in the cosmopolitan mind and its artistic expression. Moreover, I contend that my ontology of dialogic voices and proposed public art criterion, like the cosmopolitan mind itself, are “events” or “becomings.” This means that there can never be an articulation of the ontology that is final nor a public art criterion that could curtail the imaginative reach of art.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/jaac/kpad014
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2891655999</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/jaac/kpad014</oup_id><sourcerecordid>2891655999</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoWEd3_oCCCzfWSdK8plmW4hcM6ELXIZMm2DptapIK_ntbOmvf5i7e4V44CF0TfE-wyLedUnr7NaoGE3aCEgIMZwVlcIoSjCnJSqDiHF2E0OH5OC0SxGsXeje6QxvV0IY-VUOTxk-T1t6o2P6YtNJzLB9n07dpf2h1Wvl4ic6sOgRzdcwN-nh8eK-fs93r00td7TJNBcQMGKd7DTkttbWCGs4KLEoMFpNcGQ2cKU1MziEvWMO50AygMQ1TlithtM436GbtHb37nkyIsnOTH-ZJSUtBCgAhxEzdrZT2LgRvrBx92yv_KwmWixq5qJFHNTN-u-JuGv8n_wAsHWSG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2891655999</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art</title><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><source>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</source><source>Art &amp; Architecture Source</source><source>Oxford Journals Online</source><source>Humanities Index</source><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Cosmopolitanism seeks a political ethics of world togetherness and a political aesthetics that can contribute to this task critically and imaginatively. Regarding political ethics, I explore the world as a “cosmopolitan mind” composed of “dialogic voices” and threatened by neoliberalism, neofascism, and other nihilistic “oracles.” I also construct a criterion for determining which public artworks (1) resist oracles and (2) help us imagine a “cosmopolitan democracy” and its political ethics. The latter includes the concordance of three ethico-political virtues—solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity (creating new voices through the interplay among other voices)—and must appeal to different peoples worldwide. I also examine how this political ethics and aesthetics can be applied to nonhuman life and non-sentient formations in a non-anthropocentric manner; indeed, how the cosmos in its entirety and plurality can also be thought of as voices and participants in the cosmopolitan mind and its artistic expression. Moreover, I contend that my ontology of dialogic voices and proposed public art criterion, like the cosmopolitan mind itself, are “events” or “becomings.” This means that there can never be an articulation of the ontology that is final nor a public art criterion that could curtail the imaginative reach of art.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8529</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1540-6245</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/jaac/kpad014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>UK: Oxford University Press</publisher><subject>Activism ; Cosmopolitanism ; Creativity ; Ontology ; Political ethics ; Public art</subject><ispartof>The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 2023-08, Vol.81 (2), p.213-227</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Aesthetics. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society for Aesthetics. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33461,33849</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><title>Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art</title><title>The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism</title><description>Abstract Cosmopolitanism seeks a political ethics of world togetherness and a political aesthetics that can contribute to this task critically and imaginatively. Regarding political ethics, I explore the world as a “cosmopolitan mind” composed of “dialogic voices” and threatened by neoliberalism, neofascism, and other nihilistic “oracles.” I also construct a criterion for determining which public artworks (1) resist oracles and (2) help us imagine a “cosmopolitan democracy” and its political ethics. The latter includes the concordance of three ethico-political virtues—solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity (creating new voices through the interplay among other voices)—and must appeal to different peoples worldwide. I also examine how this political ethics and aesthetics can be applied to nonhuman life and non-sentient formations in a non-anthropocentric manner; indeed, how the cosmos in its entirety and plurality can also be thought of as voices and participants in the cosmopolitan mind and its artistic expression. Moreover, I contend that my ontology of dialogic voices and proposed public art criterion, like the cosmopolitan mind itself, are “events” or “becomings.” This means that there can never be an articulation of the ontology that is final nor a public art criterion that could curtail the imaginative reach of art.</description><subject>Activism</subject><subject>Cosmopolitanism</subject><subject>Creativity</subject><subject>Ontology</subject><subject>Political ethics</subject><subject>Public art</subject><issn>0021-8529</issn><issn>1540-6245</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8XN</sourceid><sourceid>C18</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE1LxDAURYMoWEd3_oCCCzfWSdK8plmW4hcM6ELXIZMm2DptapIK_ntbOmvf5i7e4V44CF0TfE-wyLedUnr7NaoGE3aCEgIMZwVlcIoSjCnJSqDiHF2E0OH5OC0SxGsXeje6QxvV0IY-VUOTxk-T1t6o2P6YtNJzLB9n07dpf2h1Wvl4ic6sOgRzdcwN-nh8eK-fs93r00td7TJNBcQMGKd7DTkttbWCGs4KLEoMFpNcGQ2cKU1MziEvWMO50AygMQ1TlithtM436GbtHb37nkyIsnOTH-ZJSUtBCgAhxEzdrZT2LgRvrBx92yv_KwmWixq5qJFHNTN-u-JuGv8n_wAsHWSG</recordid><startdate>20230804</startdate><enddate>20230804</enddate><creator>Evans, Fred</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8XN</scope><scope>C18</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230804</creationdate><title>Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art</title><author>Evans, Fred</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Activism</topic><topic>Cosmopolitanism</topic><topic>Creativity</topic><topic>Ontology</topic><topic>Political ethics</topic><topic>Public art</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Evans, Fred</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of Art (IBA)</collection><collection>Humanities Index</collection><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Evans, Fred</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism</jtitle><date>2023-08-04</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>81</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>213</spage><epage>227</epage><pages>213-227</pages><issn>0021-8529</issn><eissn>1540-6245</eissn><abstract>Abstract Cosmopolitanism seeks a political ethics of world togetherness and a political aesthetics that can contribute to this task critically and imaginatively. Regarding political ethics, I explore the world as a “cosmopolitan mind” composed of “dialogic voices” and threatened by neoliberalism, neofascism, and other nihilistic “oracles.” I also construct a criterion for determining which public artworks (1) resist oracles and (2) help us imagine a “cosmopolitan democracy” and its political ethics. The latter includes the concordance of three ethico-political virtues—solidarity, heterogeneity, and fecundity (creating new voices through the interplay among other voices)—and must appeal to different peoples worldwide. I also examine how this political ethics and aesthetics can be applied to nonhuman life and non-sentient formations in a non-anthropocentric manner; indeed, how the cosmos in its entirety and plurality can also be thought of as voices and participants in the cosmopolitan mind and its artistic expression. Moreover, I contend that my ontology of dialogic voices and proposed public art criterion, like the cosmopolitan mind itself, are “events” or “becomings.” This means that there can never be an articulation of the ontology that is final nor a public art criterion that could curtail the imaginative reach of art.</abstract><cop>UK</cop><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/jaac/kpad014</doi><tpages>15</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8529
ispartof The Journal of aesthetics and art criticism, 2023-08, Vol.81 (2), p.213-227
issn 0021-8529
1540-6245
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2891655999
source EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text; International Bibliography of Art (IBA); Art & Architecture Source; Oxford Journals Online; Humanities Index
subjects Activism
Cosmopolitanism
Creativity
Ontology
Political ethics
Public art
title Cosmopolitanism and the Creative Activism of Public Art
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T16%3A22%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Cosmopolitanism%20and%20the%20Creative%20Activism%20of%20Public%20Art&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20aesthetics%20and%20art%20criticism&rft.au=Evans,%20Fred&rft.date=2023-08-04&rft.volume=81&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=213&rft.epage=227&rft.pages=213-227&rft.issn=0021-8529&rft.eissn=1540-6245&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/jaac/kpad014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2891655999%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c295t-5472bc5328cff92e74609805f013aec574ac1e375364d779c455ded4af7a9ecc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2891655999&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/jaac/kpad014&rfr_iscdi=true