Loading…
How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry?
PurposeSocial procurement is becoming an increasing policy focus for governments around the world as they seek to incentivise new collaborative partnerships with private organisations in industries like construction to meet their social obligations. The limited construction management research in th...
Saved in:
Published in: | Engineering, construction, and architectural management construction, and architectural management, 2023-11, Vol.30 (9), p.4192-4209 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233 |
container_end_page | 4209 |
container_issue | 9 |
container_start_page | 4192 |
container_title | Engineering, construction, and architectural management |
container_volume | 30 |
creator | Loosemore, Martin Keast, Robyn Barraket, Jo |
description | PurposeSocial procurement is becoming an increasing policy focus for governments around the world as they seek to incentivise new collaborative partnerships with private organisations in industries like construction to meet their social obligations. The limited construction management research in this area shows that the successful implementation of these policies depends on a new generation of social procurement professionals who are promoting these policies into an institutional vacuum with little organisational identity, legitimacy and support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate what these actors do to promote and build support for the implementation of these policies in their organisations.Design/methodology/approachA thematic analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 social procurement actors in the Australian construction industry is presented.FindingsResults portray an experimental, disconnected and nascent institutional field of practice with a high degree of role ambiguity and conflict. In the absence of a clear organisational identity and legitimate power-base, social procurement actors are forced to rely on incremental rather than radical innovation and the power of stories to persuade others to engage with their vision for creating social value through construction.Originality/valueContributing new insights to the emerging “practice theme” in social procurement research, this paper provides important conceptual and practical information about the attributes which determine their success, how they fit into existing organisational structures and how they build support to achieve enabling institutional change. Academically, the results advance understanding of how social procurement professionals are implementing these policies into their organisations. Practically, they provide new information which enable social procurement professionals to improve their practices and construction companies to recruit the right people into these roles and design their organisations to more effectively support them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0111 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2892621143</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2892621143</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNptkUFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAczT50rTJScaYTlC8KHgLaZq6jK2ZScvYvzd1XgRP-eB93vDlCULXjN4yRuXdYj57IRQIUABCGWMnaMJ4KQhw-DhFE6pKRZSS8hxdpLSmlMlC8AnaL8Mem-hwCtabDd7FYIfotq7rsbF9iAmnldn57hMb3Lk9br3bNDi0I9m6lHzofmoZ9tZh3-F-5fBsSH00G286bEOX5yHHoctxMyaH-0t01ppNcle_5xS9Pyze5kvy_Pr4NJ89EwtV1RNZgGmACmOUasuyBtrwqqxrziVTrDJlWSjZcNuKuqkYMCEqqIWAbKDII-dTdHO8N6_7NbjU63UYYl45aZAKSsjgSLEjZWNIKbpW76LfmnjQjOrRrx79agp69KtHv7lDj50sKz-1-bfy50v4N2A5fII</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2892621143</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry?</title><source>ABI/INFORM Global</source><source>Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list)</source><creator>Loosemore, Martin ; Keast, Robyn ; Barraket, Jo</creator><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, Martin ; Keast, Robyn ; Barraket, Jo</creatorcontrib><description>PurposeSocial procurement is becoming an increasing policy focus for governments around the world as they seek to incentivise new collaborative partnerships with private organisations in industries like construction to meet their social obligations. The limited construction management research in this area shows that the successful implementation of these policies depends on a new generation of social procurement professionals who are promoting these policies into an institutional vacuum with little organisational identity, legitimacy and support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate what these actors do to promote and build support for the implementation of these policies in their organisations.Design/methodology/approachA thematic analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 social procurement actors in the Australian construction industry is presented.FindingsResults portray an experimental, disconnected and nascent institutional field of practice with a high degree of role ambiguity and conflict. In the absence of a clear organisational identity and legitimate power-base, social procurement actors are forced to rely on incremental rather than radical innovation and the power of stories to persuade others to engage with their vision for creating social value through construction.Originality/valueContributing new insights to the emerging “practice theme” in social procurement research, this paper provides important conceptual and practical information about the attributes which determine their success, how they fit into existing organisational structures and how they build support to achieve enabling institutional change. Academically, the results advance understanding of how social procurement professionals are implementing these policies into their organisations. Practically, they provide new information which enable social procurement professionals to improve their practices and construction companies to recruit the right people into these roles and design their organisations to more effectively support them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0969-9988</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-232X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0111</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bradford: Emerald Publishing Limited</publisher><subject>Collaboration ; Construction companies ; Construction contracts ; Construction industry ; Construction management ; Employment ; Native peoples ; Policies ; Postwar reconstruction ; Procurement ; Professional practice ; Professionals ; Social innovation ; Social responsibility ; Supply chains</subject><ispartof>Engineering, construction, and architectural management, 2023-11, Vol.30 (9), p.4192-4209</ispartof><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited</rights><rights>Emerald Publishing Limited.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2892621143/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2892621143?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,11688,27924,27925,36060,44363,74895</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barraket, Jo</creatorcontrib><title>How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry?</title><title>Engineering, construction, and architectural management</title><description>PurposeSocial procurement is becoming an increasing policy focus for governments around the world as they seek to incentivise new collaborative partnerships with private organisations in industries like construction to meet their social obligations. The limited construction management research in this area shows that the successful implementation of these policies depends on a new generation of social procurement professionals who are promoting these policies into an institutional vacuum with little organisational identity, legitimacy and support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate what these actors do to promote and build support for the implementation of these policies in their organisations.Design/methodology/approachA thematic analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 social procurement actors in the Australian construction industry is presented.FindingsResults portray an experimental, disconnected and nascent institutional field of practice with a high degree of role ambiguity and conflict. In the absence of a clear organisational identity and legitimate power-base, social procurement actors are forced to rely on incremental rather than radical innovation and the power of stories to persuade others to engage with their vision for creating social value through construction.Originality/valueContributing new insights to the emerging “practice theme” in social procurement research, this paper provides important conceptual and practical information about the attributes which determine their success, how they fit into existing organisational structures and how they build support to achieve enabling institutional change. Academically, the results advance understanding of how social procurement professionals are implementing these policies into their organisations. Practically, they provide new information which enable social procurement professionals to improve their practices and construction companies to recruit the right people into these roles and design their organisations to more effectively support them.</description><subject>Collaboration</subject><subject>Construction companies</subject><subject>Construction contracts</subject><subject>Construction industry</subject><subject>Construction management</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Native peoples</subject><subject>Policies</subject><subject>Postwar reconstruction</subject><subject>Procurement</subject><subject>Professional practice</subject><subject>Professionals</subject><subject>Social innovation</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Supply chains</subject><issn>0969-9988</issn><issn>1365-232X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><recordid>eNptkUFLwzAYhoMoOKc_wFvAczT50rTJScaYTlC8KHgLaZq6jK2ZScvYvzd1XgRP-eB93vDlCULXjN4yRuXdYj57IRQIUABCGWMnaMJ4KQhw-DhFE6pKRZSS8hxdpLSmlMlC8AnaL8Mem-hwCtabDd7FYIfotq7rsbF9iAmnldn57hMb3Lk9br3bNDi0I9m6lHzofmoZ9tZh3-F-5fBsSH00G286bEOX5yHHoctxMyaH-0t01ppNcle_5xS9Pyze5kvy_Pr4NJ89EwtV1RNZgGmACmOUasuyBtrwqqxrziVTrDJlWSjZcNuKuqkYMCEqqIWAbKDII-dTdHO8N6_7NbjU63UYYl45aZAKSsjgSLEjZWNIKbpW76LfmnjQjOrRrx79agp69KtHv7lDj50sKz-1-bfy50v4N2A5fII</recordid><startdate>20231127</startdate><enddate>20231127</enddate><creator>Loosemore, Martin</creator><creator>Keast, Robyn</creator><creator>Barraket, Jo</creator><general>Emerald Publishing Limited</general><general>Emerald Group Publishing Limited</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>0U~</scope><scope>1-H</scope><scope>7TA</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>L.0</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>M2P</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231127</creationdate><title>How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry?</title><author>Loosemore, Martin ; Keast, Robyn ; Barraket, Jo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Collaboration</topic><topic>Construction companies</topic><topic>Construction contracts</topic><topic>Construction industry</topic><topic>Construction management</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Native peoples</topic><topic>Policies</topic><topic>Postwar reconstruction</topic><topic>Procurement</topic><topic>Professional practice</topic><topic>Professionals</topic><topic>Social innovation</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Supply chains</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Loosemore, Martin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Keast, Robyn</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barraket, Jo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Global News & ABI/Inform Professional</collection><collection>Trade PRO</collection><collection>Materials Business File</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Standard</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global</collection><collection>Science Database</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>One Business</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Engineering, construction, and architectural management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Loosemore, Martin</au><au>Keast, Robyn</au><au>Barraket, Jo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry?</atitle><jtitle>Engineering, construction, and architectural management</jtitle><date>2023-11-27</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>9</issue><spage>4192</spage><epage>4209</epage><pages>4192-4209</pages><issn>0969-9988</issn><eissn>1365-232X</eissn><abstract>PurposeSocial procurement is becoming an increasing policy focus for governments around the world as they seek to incentivise new collaborative partnerships with private organisations in industries like construction to meet their social obligations. The limited construction management research in this area shows that the successful implementation of these policies depends on a new generation of social procurement professionals who are promoting these policies into an institutional vacuum with little organisational identity, legitimacy and support. The purpose of this paper is to investigate what these actors do to promote and build support for the implementation of these policies in their organisations.Design/methodology/approachA thematic analysis of in-depth semi-structured interviews with 15 social procurement actors in the Australian construction industry is presented.FindingsResults portray an experimental, disconnected and nascent institutional field of practice with a high degree of role ambiguity and conflict. In the absence of a clear organisational identity and legitimate power-base, social procurement actors are forced to rely on incremental rather than radical innovation and the power of stories to persuade others to engage with their vision for creating social value through construction.Originality/valueContributing new insights to the emerging “practice theme” in social procurement research, this paper provides important conceptual and practical information about the attributes which determine their success, how they fit into existing organisational structures and how they build support to achieve enabling institutional change. Academically, the results advance understanding of how social procurement professionals are implementing these policies into their organisations. Practically, they provide new information which enable social procurement professionals to improve their practices and construction companies to recruit the right people into these roles and design their organisations to more effectively support them.</abstract><cop>Bradford</cop><pub>Emerald Publishing Limited</pub><doi>10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0111</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0969-9988 |
ispartof | Engineering, construction, and architectural management, 2023-11, Vol.30 (9), p.4192-4209 |
issn | 0969-9988 1365-232X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2892621143 |
source | ABI/INFORM Global; Emerald:Jisc Collections:Emerald Subject Collections HE and FE 2024-2026:Emerald Premier (reading list) |
subjects | Collaboration Construction companies Construction contracts Construction industry Construction management Employment Native peoples Policies Postwar reconstruction Procurement Professional practice Professionals Social innovation Social responsibility Supply chains |
title | How are social procurement actors shaping a new field of professional practice in the Australian construction industry? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T17%3A12%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=How%20are%20social%20procurement%20actors%20shaping%20a%20new%20field%20of%20professional%20practice%20in%20the%20Australian%20construction%20industry?&rft.jtitle=Engineering,%20construction,%20and%20architectural%20management&rft.au=Loosemore,%20Martin&rft.date=2023-11-27&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=9&rft.spage=4192&rft.epage=4209&rft.pages=4192-4209&rft.issn=0969-9988&rft.eissn=1365-232X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1108/ECAM-02-2022-0111&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2892621143%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c277t-842ad205aa99f66b20d376bb3381917a66498d3cf5bd71215572b552011457233%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2892621143&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |