Loading…

Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?

The phrase “fake news” has become a household term in recent years, a feat that can in large part be attributed to its popularity during the Trump presidency. Utilising social media platforms such as Twitter, the former president and his followers used the hashtag #FakeNews to attack politicians, ci...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia) Slovenia), 2023-10, Vol.30 (4), p.534-550
Main Authors: Berry, R. Alan, Rosenbaum, Judith E., Corey, Amy M.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-25bdc50e35301241f999d2ca63aaa9f3dcfe3b97b5d4b6a77dd3841e07c61bf93
container_end_page 550
container_issue 4
container_start_page 534
container_title Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia)
container_volume 30
creator Berry, R. Alan
Rosenbaum, Judith E.
Corey, Amy M.
description The phrase “fake news” has become a household term in recent years, a feat that can in large part be attributed to its popularity during the Trump presidency. Utilising social media platforms such as Twitter, the former president and his followers used the hashtag #FakeNews to attack politicians, civic leaders, as well as media organisations with the goal of “draining the swamp.” This combination of anti-establishment rhetoric with the status quo embodied by the Office of the President raises questions about whether the rhetoric associated with the hashtag is genuine, citizen-driven critique or is in fact a form of flak, a critique of the news media produced by powerful organisations and governmental entities, as defined by the Propaganda Model (PM). This study offers an empirical analysis through a qualitative examination of social media posts using #FakeNews in conjunction with posts about immigration issues 2016–2020. Findings show that both pro-Trump and anti-Trump Twitter users utilise #FakeNews to attack the other side, obfuscate the issue, or double down on their stance, indicating that flak is systemically generated to distract citizens from effectively challenging the status quo.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/13183222.2023.2267265
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2894311543</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2894311543</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-25bdc50e35301241f999d2ca63aaa9f3dcfe3b97b5d4b6a77dd3841e07c61bf93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QQjsuTO5aZrGF5GxTmEg4sTHmLapZh9tl6QM_72tm0_3cjjcCwehW0qmlKTkjjKaMgCYAgE2BUgEJPwMjWjK4yhlQpz3e-9Eg3SJrrxfE8KTmMMIfX4Y3Ta19bb-wpNMb0xtDh43NV4dbAjG3eNFj5wOg5Bt9QY3Ds-cDXbfDSh8G_wWdOg8fu0abOs_snLdrsVzpx-u0UWlt97cnOYYvWfz1ewpWr4snmePy6gAkCECnpcFJ4ZxRijEtJJSllDohGmtZcXKojIslyLnZZwnWoiyZGlMDRFFQvNKsjGaHO-2rtl3xge1bjpX9y8VpDJmlPKY9RY_WoVrvHemUq2zO-1-FCVqiKn-Y6ohpjrFZL8arGbp</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2894311543</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><creator>Berry, R. Alan ; Rosenbaum, Judith E. ; Corey, Amy M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Berry, R. Alan ; Rosenbaum, Judith E. ; Corey, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><description>The phrase “fake news” has become a household term in recent years, a feat that can in large part be attributed to its popularity during the Trump presidency. Utilising social media platforms such as Twitter, the former president and his followers used the hashtag #FakeNews to attack politicians, civic leaders, as well as media organisations with the goal of “draining the swamp.” This combination of anti-establishment rhetoric with the status quo embodied by the Office of the President raises questions about whether the rhetoric associated with the hashtag is genuine, citizen-driven critique or is in fact a form of flak, a critique of the news media produced by powerful organisations and governmental entities, as defined by the Propaganda Model (PM). This study offers an empirical analysis through a qualitative examination of social media posts using #FakeNews in conjunction with posts about immigration issues 2016–2020. Findings show that both pro-Trump and anti-Trump Twitter users utilise #FakeNews to attack the other side, obfuscate the issue, or double down on their stance, indicating that flak is systemically generated to distract citizens from effectively challenging the status quo.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1318-3222</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1854-8377</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/13183222.2023.2267265</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljubljana: Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>False information ; Immigration ; Mass media effects ; News media ; Popularity ; Presidents ; Propaganda ; Rhetoric ; Social media ; Social networks ; Trump, Donald J Jr</subject><ispartof>Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia), 2023-10, Vol.30 (4), p.534-550</ispartof><rights>2023 EURICOM</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-25bdc50e35301241f999d2ca63aaa9f3dcfe3b97b5d4b6a77dd3841e07c61bf93</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-8853-8248 ; 0000-0003-1295-5325 ; 0000-0003-1083-9793</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27923,27924,33222</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Berry, R. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Judith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corey, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><title>Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?</title><title>Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia)</title><description>The phrase “fake news” has become a household term in recent years, a feat that can in large part be attributed to its popularity during the Trump presidency. Utilising social media platforms such as Twitter, the former president and his followers used the hashtag #FakeNews to attack politicians, civic leaders, as well as media organisations with the goal of “draining the swamp.” This combination of anti-establishment rhetoric with the status quo embodied by the Office of the President raises questions about whether the rhetoric associated with the hashtag is genuine, citizen-driven critique or is in fact a form of flak, a critique of the news media produced by powerful organisations and governmental entities, as defined by the Propaganda Model (PM). This study offers an empirical analysis through a qualitative examination of social media posts using #FakeNews in conjunction with posts about immigration issues 2016–2020. Findings show that both pro-Trump and anti-Trump Twitter users utilise #FakeNews to attack the other side, obfuscate the issue, or double down on their stance, indicating that flak is systemically generated to distract citizens from effectively challenging the status quo.</description><subject>False information</subject><subject>Immigration</subject><subject>Mass media effects</subject><subject>News media</subject><subject>Popularity</subject><subject>Presidents</subject><subject>Propaganda</subject><subject>Rhetoric</subject><subject>Social media</subject><subject>Social networks</subject><subject>Trump, Donald J Jr</subject><issn>1318-3222</issn><issn>1854-8377</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kF1LwzAUQIMoOKc_QQjsuTO5aZrGF5GxTmEg4sTHmLapZh9tl6QM_72tm0_3cjjcCwehW0qmlKTkjjKaMgCYAgE2BUgEJPwMjWjK4yhlQpz3e-9Eg3SJrrxfE8KTmMMIfX4Y3Ta19bb-wpNMb0xtDh43NV4dbAjG3eNFj5wOg5Bt9QY3Ds-cDXbfDSh8G_wWdOg8fu0abOs_snLdrsVzpx-u0UWlt97cnOYYvWfz1ewpWr4snmePy6gAkCECnpcFJ4ZxRijEtJJSllDohGmtZcXKojIslyLnZZwnWoiyZGlMDRFFQvNKsjGaHO-2rtl3xge1bjpX9y8VpDJmlPKY9RY_WoVrvHemUq2zO-1-FCVqiKn-Y6ohpjrFZL8arGbp</recordid><startdate>20231002</startdate><enddate>20231002</enddate><creator>Berry, R. Alan</creator><creator>Rosenbaum, Judith E.</creator><creator>Corey, Amy M.</creator><general>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-5325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-9793</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231002</creationdate><title>Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?</title><author>Berry, R. Alan ; Rosenbaum, Judith E. ; Corey, Amy M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-25bdc50e35301241f999d2ca63aaa9f3dcfe3b97b5d4b6a77dd3841e07c61bf93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>False information</topic><topic>Immigration</topic><topic>Mass media effects</topic><topic>News media</topic><topic>Popularity</topic><topic>Presidents</topic><topic>Propaganda</topic><topic>Rhetoric</topic><topic>Social media</topic><topic>Social networks</topic><topic>Trump, Donald J Jr</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Berry, R. Alan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rosenbaum, Judith E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Corey, Amy M.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Berry, R. Alan</au><au>Rosenbaum, Judith E.</au><au>Corey, Amy M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?</atitle><jtitle>Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia)</jtitle><date>2023-10-02</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>534</spage><epage>550</epage><pages>534-550</pages><issn>1318-3222</issn><eissn>1854-8377</eissn><abstract>The phrase “fake news” has become a household term in recent years, a feat that can in large part be attributed to its popularity during the Trump presidency. Utilising social media platforms such as Twitter, the former president and his followers used the hashtag #FakeNews to attack politicians, civic leaders, as well as media organisations with the goal of “draining the swamp.” This combination of anti-establishment rhetoric with the status quo embodied by the Office of the President raises questions about whether the rhetoric associated with the hashtag is genuine, citizen-driven critique or is in fact a form of flak, a critique of the news media produced by powerful organisations and governmental entities, as defined by the Propaganda Model (PM). This study offers an empirical analysis through a qualitative examination of social media posts using #FakeNews in conjunction with posts about immigration issues 2016–2020. Findings show that both pro-Trump and anti-Trump Twitter users utilise #FakeNews to attack the other side, obfuscate the issue, or double down on their stance, indicating that flak is systemically generated to distract citizens from effectively challenging the status quo.</abstract><cop>Ljubljana</cop><pub>Taylor &amp; Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/13183222.2023.2267265</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8853-8248</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1295-5325</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1083-9793</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1318-3222
ispartof Javnost (Ljubljana, Slovenia), 2023-10, Vol.30 (4), p.534-550
issn 1318-3222
1854-8377
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2894311543
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Taylor & Francis; Worldwide Political Science Abstracts
subjects False information
Immigration
Mass media effects
News media
Popularity
Presidents
Propaganda
Rhetoric
Social media
Social networks
Trump, Donald J Jr
title Weaponising #Fakenews on Twitter: Generating Flak or Critiquing the Status Quo in the Trump Era?
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T17%3A26%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Weaponising%20%23Fakenews%20on%20Twitter:%20Generating%20Flak%20or%20Critiquing%20the%20Status%20Quo%20in%20the%20Trump%20Era?&rft.jtitle=Javnost%20(Ljubljana,%20Slovenia)&rft.au=Berry,%20R.%20Alan&rft.date=2023-10-02&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=534&rft.epage=550&rft.pages=534-550&rft.issn=1318-3222&rft.eissn=1854-8377&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/13183222.2023.2267265&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2894311543%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c229t-25bdc50e35301241f999d2ca63aaa9f3dcfe3b97b5d4b6a77dd3841e07c61bf93%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2894311543&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true