Loading…

Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of addressing goals-of-care (GOC) with selected patients in the emergency department (ED), GOC documentation, hospital utilization, and patient satisfaction. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, and prospective, observational con...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of palliative care 2024-01, Vol.39 (1), p.3-12
Main Authors: Bigelow, Suzanne, Medzon, Ron, Siegel, Mari, Jin, Ruyun
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3
container_end_page 12
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title Journal of palliative care
container_volume 39
creator Bigelow, Suzanne
Medzon, Ron
Siegel, Mari
Jin, Ruyun
description Objective: This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of addressing goals-of-care (GOC) with selected patients in the emergency department (ED), GOC documentation, hospital utilization, and patient satisfaction. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, and prospective, observational convenience-sample study. ED registered nurses (ED RNs) received standardized GOC conversation training. Their selection criteria included a selection interview, a minimum of 3 years of ED clinical experience, and current employment in the ED. ED RNs used a standardized GOC questionnaire. Patient inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and one or more of the following: chronic kidney disease ≥ stage III, congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤ 40%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with home oxygen use, and/or malignancy with metastasis. GOC conversations were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were completed as appropriate. Select individual patient data for the 12 months prior to the conversation were compared with the following 12 months. Results: Over 6 months, 94 of 133 patients who were approached consented to the GOC discussion with the RN. All 94 enrolled patients had their GOC recorded into the EMR. One-third already had a completed POLST form prior to ED arrival. 50% without a POLST on ED arrival left with a completed POLST. Eighty-four patients survived the index visit and 46 patients survived to study completion. Patient satisfaction with the interaction was high: In the cohort who survived past the index visit, 95% rated their experience at 4/5 or 5/5 (Likert scale, 5: strongly agree, 1: strongly disagree). In the survival-to-study completion cohort, 100% rated their experience as 4/5 or 5/5. Subsequent median ED visits decreased by 15% (1.0-4.0 interquartile range). There were no statistically significant changes in hospitalizations (both decreased by 25%, 0-3.0) or intensive care unit admissions (0%, 0-0). Conclusions: An ED RN-led GOC conversation had high patient satisfaction and 100% GOC documentation in the EMR. There was a significant increase in ED POLST form completion. There were no significant changes noted in subsequent hospitalizations, length of hospitalization, or intensive care unit utilization.
doi_str_mv 10.1177/08258597221149402
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2895204240</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sage_id>10.1177_08258597221149402</sage_id><sourcerecordid>2895204240</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMQf87MSJ2VBaClJFF5gjx3muUjVxsR2k_nsSFYkBMb3hvrt7OkJugd0D5PkDK3hWZCrnHCBVKeNnZMaFVEnGlTgns0lPJuCSXIWwY4zljLMZqRetta0Z9pGWrv9CH3RsXR8e6WaIxnUYqLN02aHfYm-OdIEH7WOHfaRvgw-YLFqPJmJDV07vQ-JsUmqPdNEGM4QwRV2TCztKePNz5-TjefleviTrzeq1fFonRsgijs81wFKRCmjAygY4q7moFYNay7xJdZZLCSBrYBliLbWpVZMBcAXWCgZWzMndKffg3eeAIVY7N_h-rKx4oTLOUp6ykYITZbwLwaOtDr7ttD9WwKppyurPlKPn_uQJeou_qf8bvgHp-3Mi</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2895204240</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions</title><source>Sage Journals Online</source><creator>Bigelow, Suzanne ; Medzon, Ron ; Siegel, Mari ; Jin, Ruyun</creator><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, Suzanne ; Medzon, Ron ; Siegel, Mari ; Jin, Ruyun</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of addressing goals-of-care (GOC) with selected patients in the emergency department (ED), GOC documentation, hospital utilization, and patient satisfaction. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, and prospective, observational convenience-sample study. ED registered nurses (ED RNs) received standardized GOC conversation training. Their selection criteria included a selection interview, a minimum of 3 years of ED clinical experience, and current employment in the ED. ED RNs used a standardized GOC questionnaire. Patient inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and one or more of the following: chronic kidney disease ≥ stage III, congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤ 40%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with home oxygen use, and/or malignancy with metastasis. GOC conversations were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were completed as appropriate. Select individual patient data for the 12 months prior to the conversation were compared with the following 12 months. Results: Over 6 months, 94 of 133 patients who were approached consented to the GOC discussion with the RN. All 94 enrolled patients had their GOC recorded into the EMR. One-third already had a completed POLST form prior to ED arrival. 50% without a POLST on ED arrival left with a completed POLST. Eighty-four patients survived the index visit and 46 patients survived to study completion. Patient satisfaction with the interaction was high: In the cohort who survived past the index visit, 95% rated their experience at 4/5 or 5/5 (Likert scale, 5: strongly agree, 1: strongly disagree). In the survival-to-study completion cohort, 100% rated their experience as 4/5 or 5/5. Subsequent median ED visits decreased by 15% (1.0-4.0 interquartile range). There were no statistically significant changes in hospitalizations (both decreased by 25%, 0-3.0) or intensive care unit admissions (0%, 0-0). Conclusions: An ED RN-led GOC conversation had high patient satisfaction and 100% GOC documentation in the EMR. There was a significant increase in ED POLST form completion. There were no significant changes noted in subsequent hospitalizations, length of hospitalization, or intensive care unit utilization.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0825-8597</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2369-5293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1177/08258597221149402</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications</publisher><subject>Advance directives ; Cancer ; Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease ; Clinical decision making ; Communication ; Emergency medical care ; Heart failure ; Hospitalization ; Intensive care ; Kidney diseases ; Nursing care ; Palliative care ; Patient care planning ; Patient satisfaction</subject><ispartof>Journal of palliative care, 2024-01, Vol.39 (1), p.3-12</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,79236</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medzon, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ruyun</creatorcontrib><title>Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions</title><title>Journal of palliative care</title><addtitle>Journal of Palliative Care</addtitle><description>Objective: This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of addressing goals-of-care (GOC) with selected patients in the emergency department (ED), GOC documentation, hospital utilization, and patient satisfaction. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, and prospective, observational convenience-sample study. ED registered nurses (ED RNs) received standardized GOC conversation training. Their selection criteria included a selection interview, a minimum of 3 years of ED clinical experience, and current employment in the ED. ED RNs used a standardized GOC questionnaire. Patient inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and one or more of the following: chronic kidney disease ≥ stage III, congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤ 40%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with home oxygen use, and/or malignancy with metastasis. GOC conversations were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were completed as appropriate. Select individual patient data for the 12 months prior to the conversation were compared with the following 12 months. Results: Over 6 months, 94 of 133 patients who were approached consented to the GOC discussion with the RN. All 94 enrolled patients had their GOC recorded into the EMR. One-third already had a completed POLST form prior to ED arrival. 50% without a POLST on ED arrival left with a completed POLST. Eighty-four patients survived the index visit and 46 patients survived to study completion. Patient satisfaction with the interaction was high: In the cohort who survived past the index visit, 95% rated their experience at 4/5 or 5/5 (Likert scale, 5: strongly agree, 1: strongly disagree). In the survival-to-study completion cohort, 100% rated their experience as 4/5 or 5/5. Subsequent median ED visits decreased by 15% (1.0-4.0 interquartile range). There were no statistically significant changes in hospitalizations (both decreased by 25%, 0-3.0) or intensive care unit admissions (0%, 0-0). Conclusions: An ED RN-led GOC conversation had high patient satisfaction and 100% GOC documentation in the EMR. There was a significant increase in ED POLST form completion. There were no significant changes noted in subsequent hospitalizations, length of hospitalization, or intensive care unit utilization.</description><subject>Advance directives</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</subject><subject>Clinical decision making</subject><subject>Communication</subject><subject>Emergency medical care</subject><subject>Heart failure</subject><subject>Hospitalization</subject><subject>Intensive care</subject><subject>Kidney diseases</subject><subject>Nursing care</subject><subject>Palliative care</subject><subject>Patient care planning</subject><subject>Patient satisfaction</subject><issn>0825-8597</issn><issn>2369-5293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kDFPwzAUhC0EEqXwA9gsMQf87MSJ2VBaClJFF5gjx3muUjVxsR2k_nsSFYkBMb3hvrt7OkJugd0D5PkDK3hWZCrnHCBVKeNnZMaFVEnGlTgns0lPJuCSXIWwY4zljLMZqRetta0Z9pGWrv9CH3RsXR8e6WaIxnUYqLN02aHfYm-OdIEH7WOHfaRvgw-YLFqPJmJDV07vQ-JsUmqPdNEGM4QwRV2TCztKePNz5-TjefleviTrzeq1fFonRsgijs81wFKRCmjAygY4q7moFYNay7xJdZZLCSBrYBliLbWpVZMBcAXWCgZWzMndKffg3eeAIVY7N_h-rKx4oTLOUp6ykYITZbwLwaOtDr7ttD9WwKppyurPlKPn_uQJeou_qf8bvgHp-3Mi</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Bigelow, Suzanne</creator><creator>Medzon, Ron</creator><creator>Siegel, Mari</creator><creator>Jin, Ruyun</creator><general>SAGE Publications</general><general>SAGE PUBLICATIONS, INC</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ASE</scope><scope>FPQ</scope><scope>K6X</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions</title><author>Bigelow, Suzanne ; Medzon, Ron ; Siegel, Mari ; Jin, Ruyun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Advance directives</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease</topic><topic>Clinical decision making</topic><topic>Communication</topic><topic>Emergency medical care</topic><topic>Heart failure</topic><topic>Hospitalization</topic><topic>Intensive care</topic><topic>Kidney diseases</topic><topic>Nursing care</topic><topic>Palliative care</topic><topic>Patient care planning</topic><topic>Patient satisfaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bigelow, Suzanne</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Medzon, Ron</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Siegel, Mari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jin, Ruyun</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>British Nursing Index (BNI) (1985 to Present)</collection><collection>British Nursing Index</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><jtitle>Journal of palliative care</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bigelow, Suzanne</au><au>Medzon, Ron</au><au>Siegel, Mari</au><au>Jin, Ruyun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions</atitle><jtitle>Journal of palliative care</jtitle><addtitle>Journal of Palliative Care</addtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>12</epage><pages>3-12</pages><issn>0825-8597</issn><eissn>2369-5293</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aims to evaluate the potential impact of addressing goals-of-care (GOC) with selected patients in the emergency department (ED), GOC documentation, hospital utilization, and patient satisfaction. Method: This is a single-center, retrospective, and prospective, observational convenience-sample study. ED registered nurses (ED RNs) received standardized GOC conversation training. Their selection criteria included a selection interview, a minimum of 3 years of ED clinical experience, and current employment in the ED. ED RNs used a standardized GOC questionnaire. Patient inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years and one or more of the following: chronic kidney disease ≥ stage III, congestive heart failure with an ejection fraction ≤ 40%, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with home oxygen use, and/or malignancy with metastasis. GOC conversations were recorded in the electronic medical record (EMR). Physician Orders for Life-Sustaining Treatment (POLST) forms were completed as appropriate. Select individual patient data for the 12 months prior to the conversation were compared with the following 12 months. Results: Over 6 months, 94 of 133 patients who were approached consented to the GOC discussion with the RN. All 94 enrolled patients had their GOC recorded into the EMR. One-third already had a completed POLST form prior to ED arrival. 50% without a POLST on ED arrival left with a completed POLST. Eighty-four patients survived the index visit and 46 patients survived to study completion. Patient satisfaction with the interaction was high: In the cohort who survived past the index visit, 95% rated their experience at 4/5 or 5/5 (Likert scale, 5: strongly agree, 1: strongly disagree). In the survival-to-study completion cohort, 100% rated their experience as 4/5 or 5/5. Subsequent median ED visits decreased by 15% (1.0-4.0 interquartile range). There were no statistically significant changes in hospitalizations (both decreased by 25%, 0-3.0) or intensive care unit admissions (0%, 0-0). Conclusions: An ED RN-led GOC conversation had high patient satisfaction and 100% GOC documentation in the EMR. There was a significant increase in ED POLST form completion. There were no significant changes noted in subsequent hospitalizations, length of hospitalization, or intensive care unit utilization.</abstract><cop>Los Angeles, CA</cop><pub>SAGE Publications</pub><doi>10.1177/08258597221149402</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0825-8597
ispartof Journal of palliative care, 2024-01, Vol.39 (1), p.3-12
issn 0825-8597
2369-5293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2895204240
source Sage Journals Online
subjects Advance directives
Cancer
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Clinical decision making
Communication
Emergency medical care
Heart failure
Hospitalization
Intensive care
Kidney diseases
Nursing care
Palliative care
Patient care planning
Patient satisfaction
title Difficult Conversations: Outcomes of Emergency Department Nurse-Directed Goals-of-Care Discussions
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T18%3A46%3A19IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Difficult%20Conversations:%20Outcomes%20of%20Emergency%20Department%20Nurse-Directed%20Goals-of-Care%20Discussions&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20palliative%20care&rft.au=Bigelow,%20Suzanne&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=12&rft.pages=3-12&rft.issn=0825-8597&rft.eissn=2369-5293&rft_id=info:doi/10.1177/08258597221149402&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2895204240%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c368t-85d1043431d1f6d120b23b901ba67d4a5766116b105eeb6acb9d511291ff301f3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2895204240&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_sage_id=10.1177_08258597221149402&rfr_iscdi=true