Loading…
The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government
In recent years, the concept of 'free speech' appears to have reached a position of significant prominence in public debate. In this context, we ask 'how' the concept of free speech was used discursively by the Morrison-led government. Utilising a political discourse analytic app...
Saved in:
Published in: | Australian journal of political science 2023-12, Vol.58 (4), p.326-342 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-41207e6c341fdcaa33d1168cd1d0ea4ee4770fb70e50d80667a66bd48348b8c53 |
container_end_page | 342 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 326 |
container_title | Australian journal of political science |
container_volume | 58 |
creator | Gelber, Katharine Murphy, Molly |
description | In recent years, the concept of 'free speech' appears to have reached a position of significant prominence in public debate. In this context, we ask 'how' the concept of free speech was used discursively by the Morrison-led government. Utilising a political discourse analytic approach, and examining texts from 2019 to 2021, we argue that, and show how, the government engaged in multiple discourses around free speech that were incompatible, inconsistent and incoherent. These inconsistencies and discontinuities were so significant as to render this a 'weaponisation' of free speech discourse. Thus, the article both reveals the complexities of the Morrison government's discursive positioning of free speech, and renders sensible the otherwise nonsensical way in which 'free speech' was used to garner support for a range of public policies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/10361146.2023.2242304 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2896642359</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/agispt.20231206099961</informt_id><sourcerecordid>2896642359</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-41207e6c341fdcaa33d1168cd1d0ea4ee4770fb70e50d80667a66bd48348b8c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQVjwvHUmSbO7F0GKWqHipYK3kG5m2xS7WZOt4rc3a-1p_vCbN7zH2DXCBKGEWwShEKWacOBiwrnkAuQJG6FQIgcB76epT0w-QOfsIsYtAHJZqRG7W24o-ybT-dZF0zvfZr7JmkCUxY6o3mT71lLI-oS9-BBcTMTaf1Fod9T2l-ysMR-Rrv7rmL09Pixn83zx-vQ8u1_ktZDY5xI5FKSGobG1MUJYRFXWFi2QkUSyKKBZFUBTsCUoVRilVlaWQparsp6KMbs56HbBf-4p9nrr96FNLzUvK6WS5WmVqOmBqoOPMVCju-B2JvxoBD1EpY9R6SEq_R9Vupsf7sLO9dqsXex6HcmEeqNd2_i_tQ9rbb0bpIRAdcQGoeROQVVVCsUvK4FzsA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2896642359</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</source><source>Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection</source><creator>Gelber, Katharine ; Murphy, Molly</creator><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Katharine ; Murphy, Molly</creatorcontrib><description>In recent years, the concept of 'free speech' appears to have reached a position of significant prominence in public debate. In this context, we ask 'how' the concept of free speech was used discursively by the Morrison-led government. Utilising a political discourse analytic approach, and examining texts from 2019 to 2021, we argue that, and show how, the government engaged in multiple discourses around free speech that were incompatible, inconsistent and incoherent. These inconsistencies and discontinuities were so significant as to render this a 'weaponisation' of free speech discourse. Thus, the article both reveals the complexities of the Morrison government's discursive positioning of free speech, and renders sensible the otherwise nonsensical way in which 'free speech' was used to garner support for a range of public policies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1036-1146</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1363-030X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/10361146.2023.2242304</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Abingdon: Taylor & Francis Ltd</publisher><subject>Debates and debating ; Discourse analysis ; Discourses ; Freedom of speech ; Government ; Political aspects ; Political discourse ; Politics and government ; Positioning ; Prime ministers</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of political science, 2023-12, Vol.58 (4), p.326-342</ispartof><rights>2023 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution – Non-Commercial – No Derivatives License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-41207e6c341fdcaa33d1168cd1d0ea4ee4770fb70e50d80667a66bd48348b8c53</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3318-9124 ; 0000-0002-0239-3552</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902,33200</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Molly</creatorcontrib><title>The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government</title><title>Australian journal of political science</title><description>In recent years, the concept of 'free speech' appears to have reached a position of significant prominence in public debate. In this context, we ask 'how' the concept of free speech was used discursively by the Morrison-led government. Utilising a political discourse analytic approach, and examining texts from 2019 to 2021, we argue that, and show how, the government engaged in multiple discourses around free speech that were incompatible, inconsistent and incoherent. These inconsistencies and discontinuities were so significant as to render this a 'weaponisation' of free speech discourse. Thus, the article both reveals the complexities of the Morrison government's discursive positioning of free speech, and renders sensible the otherwise nonsensical way in which 'free speech' was used to garner support for a range of public policies.</description><subject>Debates and debating</subject><subject>Discourse analysis</subject><subject>Discourses</subject><subject>Freedom of speech</subject><subject>Government</subject><subject>Political aspects</subject><subject>Political discourse</subject><subject>Politics and government</subject><subject>Positioning</subject><subject>Prime ministers</subject><issn>1036-1146</issn><issn>1363-030X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7UB</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kE9LAzEQxYMoWKsfQVjwvHUmSbO7F0GKWqHipYK3kG5m2xS7WZOt4rc3a-1p_vCbN7zH2DXCBKGEWwShEKWacOBiwrnkAuQJG6FQIgcB76epT0w-QOfsIsYtAHJZqRG7W24o-ybT-dZF0zvfZr7JmkCUxY6o3mT71lLI-oS9-BBcTMTaf1Fod9T2l-ysMR-Rrv7rmL09Pixn83zx-vQ8u1_ktZDY5xI5FKSGobG1MUJYRFXWFi2QkUSyKKBZFUBTsCUoVRilVlaWQparsp6KMbs56HbBf-4p9nrr96FNLzUvK6WS5WmVqOmBqoOPMVCju-B2JvxoBD1EpY9R6SEq_R9Vupsf7sLO9dqsXex6HcmEeqNd2_i_tQ9rbb0bpIRAdcQGoeROQVVVCsUvK4FzsA</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Gelber, Katharine</creator><creator>Murphy, Molly</creator><general>Taylor & Francis Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UB</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-9124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-3552</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government</title><author>Gelber, Katharine ; Murphy, Molly</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-41207e6c341fdcaa33d1168cd1d0ea4ee4770fb70e50d80667a66bd48348b8c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Debates and debating</topic><topic>Discourse analysis</topic><topic>Discourses</topic><topic>Freedom of speech</topic><topic>Government</topic><topic>Political aspects</topic><topic>Political discourse</topic><topic>Politics and government</topic><topic>Positioning</topic><topic>Prime ministers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gelber, Katharine</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Murphy, Molly</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Worldwide Political Science Abstracts</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gelber, Katharine</au><au>Murphy, Molly</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of political science</jtitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>58</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>326</spage><epage>342</epage><pages>326-342</pages><issn>1036-1146</issn><eissn>1363-030X</eissn><abstract>In recent years, the concept of 'free speech' appears to have reached a position of significant prominence in public debate. In this context, we ask 'how' the concept of free speech was used discursively by the Morrison-led government. Utilising a political discourse analytic approach, and examining texts from 2019 to 2021, we argue that, and show how, the government engaged in multiple discourses around free speech that were incompatible, inconsistent and incoherent. These inconsistencies and discontinuities were so significant as to render this a 'weaponisation' of free speech discourse. Thus, the article both reveals the complexities of the Morrison government's discursive positioning of free speech, and renders sensible the otherwise nonsensical way in which 'free speech' was used to garner support for a range of public policies.</abstract><cop>Abingdon</cop><pub>Taylor & Francis Ltd</pub><doi>10.1080/10361146.2023.2242304</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3318-9124</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-3552</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1036-1146 |
ispartof | Australian journal of political science, 2023-12, Vol.58 (4), p.326-342 |
issn | 1036-1146 1363-030X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2896642359 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Worldwide Political Science Abstracts; Taylor and Francis Social Sciences and Humanities Collection |
subjects | Debates and debating Discourse analysis Discourses Freedom of speech Government Political aspects Political discourse Politics and government Positioning Prime ministers |
title | The weaponisation of free speech under the Morrison government |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T22%3A04%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=The%20weaponisation%20of%20free%20speech%20under%20the%20Morrison%20government&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20political%20science&rft.au=Gelber,%20Katharine&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=58&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=326&rft.epage=342&rft.pages=326-342&rft.issn=1036-1146&rft.eissn=1363-030X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/10361146.2023.2242304&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2896642359%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c341t-41207e6c341fdcaa33d1168cd1d0ea4ee4770fb70e50d80667a66bd48348b8c53%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2896642359&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/agispt.20231206099961&rfr_iscdi=true |