An ontological struggle: Islamic political theology and the criminalization of same‐sex sexuality in Indonesia

This paper examines legal efforts to criminalize same‐sex sexualities between consenting adults by conservative Muslim movements in Indonesia, epitomized by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia's 2016 Judicial Review on the Indonesian Penal Code, continuous resistance to the Sexual Violence La...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Political and legal anthropology review 2023-11, Vol.46 (2), p.160-176
Main Author: Ramadhan, Febi R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Adults
Asian studies
Constitutional courts
Criminalization
Ethnography
Frame analysis
God
Imposition
Indonesia
Islam
Judicial reviews
Muslims
Ontology
Personhood
political theology
Resistance
same‐sex sexualities
Secularization
Sex crimes
Sex offenders
Sexual violence
Sexuality
Theology
Violent crime
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:This paper examines legal efforts to criminalize same‐sex sexualities between consenting adults by conservative Muslim movements in Indonesia, epitomized by the Constitutional Court of Indonesia's 2016 Judicial Review on the Indonesian Penal Code, continuous resistance to the Sexual Violence Law, and the current Indonesian Penal Code. Based on my ethnography of the Judicial Review's court transcript and other legal archives, I argue that the conservative Muslim movements’ legal effort to criminalize sexuality in Indonesia is an exercise of Islamic political theology revolving around a certain ontology of personhood concerning the relationships between “the human” and God, the state, and the nation. This ontology is apparent in their assertion about the intrinsic difference between sexual violence (“kekerasan seksual”) vs. sexual crime (“kejahatan seksual”). This paper aims to: (1) demonstrate that anthropological inquiries of ontologies can further develop the conceptual framework of political theology, especially in elucidating how ontological imposition of “the human” and its personhood plays a pivotal part in conservative movements’ repertoires in criminalizing sexuality; and (2) make use of Southeast Asian studies’ scholarships and cases to speak back to the broader discussion on the fissures in/of secular imaginaries and secularization processes.
ISSN:1081-6976
1555-2934
DOI:10.1111/plar.12536