Issues of Error Selection for Focused Written Corrective Feedback in Authentic Classroom Contexts

In conventional written corrective feedback (WCF) practice, teachers spend an inordinate amount of time identifying every error in student writing. Research evidence suggests that such a comprehensive WCF approach is both undesirable and ineffective. Recent research has shown that focused WCF, where...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:RELC journal 2023-12, Vol.54 (3), p.616-629
Main Authors: Lee, Icy, Luo, Na, Mak, Pauline
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Error analysis
Feedback
Research design
Second language instruction
Second language teachers
Second language writing
Student writing
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In conventional written corrective feedback (WCF) practice, teachers spend an inordinate amount of time identifying every error in student writing. Research evidence suggests that such a comprehensive WCF approach is both undesirable and ineffective. Recent research has shown that focused WCF, where teachers respond to errors selectively, is a good practice since it is more manageable and less discouraging for students. Much of existing WCF research on focused WCF, however, has adopted the experimental or quasi-experimental design, involving a very small number of error categories, without paying attention to the real-life classroom conditions in which WCF takes place. To fill the research gap, the present study investigates how two secondary teachers select target language features for focused WCF and the issues that arise from their WCF practice. The paper provides pedagogical implications that contribute to our understanding of how teachers can go about selecting errors for focused WCF in authentic second language writing classrooms, as contrasted with experimental classrooms.
ISSN:0033-6882
1745-526X
DOI:10.1177/00336882211028425