Loading…

Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well

The tubing used in a gas well rarely collapses and fails during applying annulus pressure. In this study, the failure causes of tubing collapse were analyzed by means of data verification, macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, physical and chemical inspection, optical microscopy, an...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Mathematical problems in engineering 2023, Vol.2023 (1)
Main Authors: Zhao, Jinlan, Tong, Ke, Lei, Junjie, Bai, Xiaoliang, Li, Dongfeng, Shen, Zhaoxi, Qu, Tingting, Li, Xiaolong
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2099-d318ab1ea47c9607b66ba3f109e5c7427fb6052ab6f51be7a89d794afcd7f4e33
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page
container_title Mathematical problems in engineering
container_volume 2023
creator Zhao, Jinlan
Tong, Ke
Lei, Junjie
Bai, Xiaoliang
Li, Dongfeng
Shen, Zhaoxi
Qu, Tingting
Li, Xiaolong
description The tubing used in a gas well rarely collapses and fails during applying annulus pressure. In this study, the failure causes of tubing collapse were analyzed by means of data verification, macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, physical and chemical inspection, optical microscopy, and tubing collapse test. Mechanical analysis of the string and full-scale physical simulation test simulating downhole working conditions. Finally, the verification analysis of the collapse test is carried out by the finite element analysis (FEA). The results showed that (1) the physical dimension, physical and chemical properties, and collapse resistance of this batch of tubing met the requirements of the tubing ordering technical standard. (2) Assuming that the well packer slip was unsealed and could slide freely, the mechanical theoretical analysis of collapsed tubing string and collapse test under simulated working condition load was carried out, which reproduced the load when the tubing collapsed. It can be seen from this that the packer did fail. (3) The FEA calculation results showed that when the external pressure was greater than 30.75 MPa, it would inevitably lead to collapse failure in case of packer unsealed. In conclusion, the root cause for the collapse failure of the 105th underground tubing string was that the packer lost its sealing function, resulting in an abnormal axial load. While under the action of external pressure, the tubing was overloaded and collapsed. It is recommended to carry out verification tests on the material performance of packer slip, the dimensional changes of packer tool outer diameter and inner diameter under actual well conditions, the creep behavior of packer seal, and the performance of shear pin under actual working conditions, especially in the well containing H2S, so as to prevent the pressure leakage of gas well annulus caused by packer unsealing and the reoccurrence of such downhole string collapse accidents. The first collapse test under simulated working condition load is conducted in this paper. Analyzing the collapse failure work and putting forward suggestions to effectively prevent similar failures from happening again are of great significance to the oilfield.
doi_str_mv 10.1155/2023/8702719
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2900108655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2900108655</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2099-d318ab1ea47c9607b66ba3f109e5c7427fb6052ab6f51be7a89d794afcd7f4e33</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90MFKAzEQgOEgCtbqzQcIeNS1M8km2RxLsVUoeKnoLWR3E02JuzVxkb69W-rZ08zhYxh-Qq4R7hGFmDFgfFYpYAr1CZmgkLwQWKrTcQdWFsj42zm5yHkLwFBgNSG4tCEOydF5Z-M-h0x7TzdDHbp3uuhjtLvsaOiopSub6auL8ZKceRuzu_qbU_KyfNgsHov18-ppMV8XDQOti5ZjZWt0tlSNlqBqKWvLPYJ2olElU76WIJitpRdYO2Ur3SpdWt-0ypeO8ym5Od7dpf5rcPnbbPshjV9mwzQAQiWFGNXdUTWpzzk5b3YpfNq0NwjmEMUcopi_KCO_PfKP0LX2J_yvfwEVW167</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2900108655</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)</source><creator>Zhao, Jinlan ; Tong, Ke ; Lei, Junjie ; Bai, Xiaoliang ; Li, Dongfeng ; Shen, Zhaoxi ; Qu, Tingting ; Li, Xiaolong</creator><contributor>Morales, Rafael ; Rafael Morales</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinlan ; Tong, Ke ; Lei, Junjie ; Bai, Xiaoliang ; Li, Dongfeng ; Shen, Zhaoxi ; Qu, Tingting ; Li, Xiaolong ; Morales, Rafael ; Rafael Morales</creatorcontrib><description>The tubing used in a gas well rarely collapses and fails during applying annulus pressure. In this study, the failure causes of tubing collapse were analyzed by means of data verification, macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, physical and chemical inspection, optical microscopy, and tubing collapse test. Mechanical analysis of the string and full-scale physical simulation test simulating downhole working conditions. Finally, the verification analysis of the collapse test is carried out by the finite element analysis (FEA). The results showed that (1) the physical dimension, physical and chemical properties, and collapse resistance of this batch of tubing met the requirements of the tubing ordering technical standard. (2) Assuming that the well packer slip was unsealed and could slide freely, the mechanical theoretical analysis of collapsed tubing string and collapse test under simulated working condition load was carried out, which reproduced the load when the tubing collapsed. It can be seen from this that the packer did fail. (3) The FEA calculation results showed that when the external pressure was greater than 30.75 MPa, it would inevitably lead to collapse failure in case of packer unsealed. In conclusion, the root cause for the collapse failure of the 105th underground tubing string was that the packer lost its sealing function, resulting in an abnormal axial load. While under the action of external pressure, the tubing was overloaded and collapsed. It is recommended to carry out verification tests on the material performance of packer slip, the dimensional changes of packer tool outer diameter and inner diameter under actual well conditions, the creep behavior of packer seal, and the performance of shear pin under actual working conditions, especially in the well containing H2S, so as to prevent the pressure leakage of gas well annulus caused by packer unsealing and the reoccurrence of such downhole string collapse accidents. The first collapse test under simulated working condition load is conducted in this paper. Analyzing the collapse failure work and putting forward suggestions to effectively prevent similar failures from happening again are of great significance to the oilfield.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1024-123X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1563-5147</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1155/2023/8702719</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Hindawi</publisher><subject>Annuli ; Axial loads ; Chemical properties ; Collapse ; Creep (materials) ; Design optimization ; Diameters ; Dimensional changes ; Drilling ; External pressure ; Failure analysis ; Finite element method ; Gas wells ; Inspection ; Load ; Mechanical analysis ; Mechanics ; Morphology ; Oil fields ; Optical microscopy ; Physical simulation ; Rationality ; Strings ; Verification</subject><ispartof>Mathematical problems in engineering, 2023, Vol.2023 (1)</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2023 Jinlan Zhao et al.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2023 Jinlan Zhao et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (the “License”), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2099-d318ab1ea47c9607b66ba3f109e5c7427fb6052ab6f51be7a89d794afcd7f4e33</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4120-5371</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2900108655/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2900108655?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,25753,27923,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Morales, Rafael</contributor><contributor>Rafael Morales</contributor><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Zhaoxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><title>Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well</title><title>Mathematical problems in engineering</title><description>The tubing used in a gas well rarely collapses and fails during applying annulus pressure. In this study, the failure causes of tubing collapse were analyzed by means of data verification, macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, physical and chemical inspection, optical microscopy, and tubing collapse test. Mechanical analysis of the string and full-scale physical simulation test simulating downhole working conditions. Finally, the verification analysis of the collapse test is carried out by the finite element analysis (FEA). The results showed that (1) the physical dimension, physical and chemical properties, and collapse resistance of this batch of tubing met the requirements of the tubing ordering technical standard. (2) Assuming that the well packer slip was unsealed and could slide freely, the mechanical theoretical analysis of collapsed tubing string and collapse test under simulated working condition load was carried out, which reproduced the load when the tubing collapsed. It can be seen from this that the packer did fail. (3) The FEA calculation results showed that when the external pressure was greater than 30.75 MPa, it would inevitably lead to collapse failure in case of packer unsealed. In conclusion, the root cause for the collapse failure of the 105th underground tubing string was that the packer lost its sealing function, resulting in an abnormal axial load. While under the action of external pressure, the tubing was overloaded and collapsed. It is recommended to carry out verification tests on the material performance of packer slip, the dimensional changes of packer tool outer diameter and inner diameter under actual well conditions, the creep behavior of packer seal, and the performance of shear pin under actual working conditions, especially in the well containing H2S, so as to prevent the pressure leakage of gas well annulus caused by packer unsealing and the reoccurrence of such downhole string collapse accidents. The first collapse test under simulated working condition load is conducted in this paper. Analyzing the collapse failure work and putting forward suggestions to effectively prevent similar failures from happening again are of great significance to the oilfield.</description><subject>Annuli</subject><subject>Axial loads</subject><subject>Chemical properties</subject><subject>Collapse</subject><subject>Creep (materials)</subject><subject>Design optimization</subject><subject>Diameters</subject><subject>Dimensional changes</subject><subject>Drilling</subject><subject>External pressure</subject><subject>Failure analysis</subject><subject>Finite element method</subject><subject>Gas wells</subject><subject>Inspection</subject><subject>Load</subject><subject>Mechanical analysis</subject><subject>Mechanics</subject><subject>Morphology</subject><subject>Oil fields</subject><subject>Optical microscopy</subject><subject>Physical simulation</subject><subject>Rationality</subject><subject>Strings</subject><subject>Verification</subject><issn>1024-123X</issn><issn>1563-5147</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNp90MFKAzEQgOEgCtbqzQcIeNS1M8km2RxLsVUoeKnoLWR3E02JuzVxkb69W-rZ08zhYxh-Qq4R7hGFmDFgfFYpYAr1CZmgkLwQWKrTcQdWFsj42zm5yHkLwFBgNSG4tCEOydF5Z-M-h0x7TzdDHbp3uuhjtLvsaOiopSub6auL8ZKceRuzu_qbU_KyfNgsHov18-ppMV8XDQOti5ZjZWt0tlSNlqBqKWvLPYJ2olElU76WIJitpRdYO2Ur3SpdWt-0ypeO8ym5Od7dpf5rcPnbbPshjV9mwzQAQiWFGNXdUTWpzzk5b3YpfNq0NwjmEMUcopi_KCO_PfKP0LX2J_yvfwEVW167</recordid><startdate>2023</startdate><enddate>2023</enddate><creator>Zhao, Jinlan</creator><creator>Tong, Ke</creator><creator>Lei, Junjie</creator><creator>Bai, Xiaoliang</creator><creator>Li, Dongfeng</creator><creator>Shen, Zhaoxi</creator><creator>Qu, Tingting</creator><creator>Li, Xiaolong</creator><general>Hindawi</general><general>Hindawi Limited</general><scope>RHU</scope><scope>RHW</scope><scope>RHX</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>CWDGH</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-5371</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>2023</creationdate><title>Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well</title><author>Zhao, Jinlan ; Tong, Ke ; Lei, Junjie ; Bai, Xiaoliang ; Li, Dongfeng ; Shen, Zhaoxi ; Qu, Tingting ; Li, Xiaolong</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2099-d318ab1ea47c9607b66ba3f109e5c7427fb6052ab6f51be7a89d794afcd7f4e33</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Annuli</topic><topic>Axial loads</topic><topic>Chemical properties</topic><topic>Collapse</topic><topic>Creep (materials)</topic><topic>Design optimization</topic><topic>Diameters</topic><topic>Dimensional changes</topic><topic>Drilling</topic><topic>External pressure</topic><topic>Failure analysis</topic><topic>Finite element method</topic><topic>Gas wells</topic><topic>Inspection</topic><topic>Load</topic><topic>Mechanical analysis</topic><topic>Mechanics</topic><topic>Morphology</topic><topic>Oil fields</topic><topic>Optical microscopy</topic><topic>Physical simulation</topic><topic>Rationality</topic><topic>Strings</topic><topic>Verification</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, Jinlan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tong, Ke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lei, Junjie</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bai, Xiaoliang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Dongfeng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Shen, Zhaoxi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Qu, Tingting</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Xiaolong</creatorcontrib><collection>Hindawi Publishing Complete</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Subscription Journals</collection><collection>Hindawi Publishing Open Access</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Middle East &amp; Africa Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest advanced technologies &amp; aerospace journals</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>Engineering collection</collection><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, Jinlan</au><au>Tong, Ke</au><au>Lei, Junjie</au><au>Bai, Xiaoliang</au><au>Li, Dongfeng</au><au>Shen, Zhaoxi</au><au>Qu, Tingting</au><au>Li, Xiaolong</au><au>Morales, Rafael</au><au>Rafael Morales</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well</atitle><jtitle>Mathematical problems in engineering</jtitle><date>2023</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>2023</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1024-123X</issn><eissn>1563-5147</eissn><abstract>The tubing used in a gas well rarely collapses and fails during applying annulus pressure. In this study, the failure causes of tubing collapse were analyzed by means of data verification, macroscopic observation, magnetic particle inspection, physical and chemical inspection, optical microscopy, and tubing collapse test. Mechanical analysis of the string and full-scale physical simulation test simulating downhole working conditions. Finally, the verification analysis of the collapse test is carried out by the finite element analysis (FEA). The results showed that (1) the physical dimension, physical and chemical properties, and collapse resistance of this batch of tubing met the requirements of the tubing ordering technical standard. (2) Assuming that the well packer slip was unsealed and could slide freely, the mechanical theoretical analysis of collapsed tubing string and collapse test under simulated working condition load was carried out, which reproduced the load when the tubing collapsed. It can be seen from this that the packer did fail. (3) The FEA calculation results showed that when the external pressure was greater than 30.75 MPa, it would inevitably lead to collapse failure in case of packer unsealed. In conclusion, the root cause for the collapse failure of the 105th underground tubing string was that the packer lost its sealing function, resulting in an abnormal axial load. While under the action of external pressure, the tubing was overloaded and collapsed. It is recommended to carry out verification tests on the material performance of packer slip, the dimensional changes of packer tool outer diameter and inner diameter under actual well conditions, the creep behavior of packer seal, and the performance of shear pin under actual working conditions, especially in the well containing H2S, so as to prevent the pressure leakage of gas well annulus caused by packer unsealing and the reoccurrence of such downhole string collapse accidents. The first collapse test under simulated working condition load is conducted in this paper. Analyzing the collapse failure work and putting forward suggestions to effectively prevent similar failures from happening again are of great significance to the oilfield.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Hindawi</pub><doi>10.1155/2023/8702719</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4120-5371</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1024-123X
ispartof Mathematical problems in engineering, 2023, Vol.2023 (1)
issn 1024-123X
1563-5147
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2900108655
source Publicly Available Content Database; Wiley-Blackwell Open Access Titles(OpenAccess)
subjects Annuli
Axial loads
Chemical properties
Collapse
Creep (materials)
Design optimization
Diameters
Dimensional changes
Drilling
External pressure
Failure analysis
Finite element method
Gas wells
Inspection
Load
Mechanical analysis
Mechanics
Morphology
Oil fields
Optical microscopy
Physical simulation
Rationality
Strings
Verification
title Failure Analysis of Tubing Collapse in a Gas Well
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T22%3A57%3A17IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Failure%20Analysis%20of%20Tubing%20Collapse%20in%20a%20Gas%20Well&rft.jtitle=Mathematical%20problems%20in%20engineering&rft.au=Zhao,%20Jinlan&rft.date=2023&rft.volume=2023&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1024-123X&rft.eissn=1563-5147&rft_id=info:doi/10.1155/2023/8702719&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2900108655%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2099-d318ab1ea47c9607b66ba3f109e5c7427fb6052ab6f51be7a89d794afcd7f4e33%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2900108655&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true