Loading…

Loss aversion in the control of attention

Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each t...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Psychonomic bulletin & review 2023-10, Vol.30 (5), p.1887-1894
Main Authors: Kim, Sunghyun, Beck, Melissa R., Cho, Yang Seok
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c076dd9c7a84fb4f713a250e44326edeece6a0ae9d188f7b894961fdc55d56e73
container_end_page 1894
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1887
container_title Psychonomic bulletin & review
container_volume 30
creator Kim, Sunghyun
Beck, Melissa R.
Cho, Yang Seok
description Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each trial, a red target and a green target were presented simultaneously, and participants were free to search for either one. Participants always gained points when they searched for a gain color target (e.g., red). However, they gained or lost points when they searched for a gain-loss color target (e.g., green). In Experiment 1, the expected values of the gain color and the gain-loss color were equal. Therefore, for maximizing the reward, participants did not need to preferably search for a particular color. However, results showed that participants searched for the gain color target more than the gain-loss color target, suggesting stronger attentional control for the gain color than the gain-loss color. In Experiment 2, even though the expected value of the gain-loss color was greater than that of the gain color, attention was allocated to the gain color more than to the gain-loss color. The results imply that attentional control can operate in accordance with the loss aversion principle when the boundary conditions for loss aversion in a repeated binary decision-making task were met.
doi_str_mv 10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2902032630</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2902032630</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c076dd9c7a84fb4f713a250e44326edeece6a0ae9d188f7b894961fdc55d56e73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqLYWv0DHmTBk4fVyTs5iviCghc9h3R3VlvaTU1SwX9v7Fa9eRhm4HsxHyGnFC65luYqUS4Yr2E7zOia7pExlZzWkjPYLzcoW1tuxIgcpbQAAKmsOiQjrkEAUDsmF9OQUuU_MKZ56Kt5X-U3rJrQ5xiWVegqnzP2uWDH5KDzy4Qnuz0hL3e3zzcP9fTp_vHmelo3nOtcN6BV29pGeyO6meg05Z5JQCE4U9giNqg8eLQtNabTM2OFVbRrGylbqVDzCTkffNcxvG8wZbcIm9iXSMcsMCg2HAqLDawmlgcidm4d5ysfPx0F992OG9pxsJ3SjqNFdLaz3sxW2P5KfuooBD4QUoH6V4x_2f_YfgEZA25-</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2902032630</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Loss aversion in the control of attention</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Kim, Sunghyun ; Beck, Melissa R. ; Cho, Yang Seok</creator><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunghyun ; Beck, Melissa R. ; Cho, Yang Seok</creatorcontrib><description>Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each trial, a red target and a green target were presented simultaneously, and participants were free to search for either one. Participants always gained points when they searched for a gain color target (e.g., red). However, they gained or lost points when they searched for a gain-loss color target (e.g., green). In Experiment 1, the expected values of the gain color and the gain-loss color were equal. Therefore, for maximizing the reward, participants did not need to preferably search for a particular color. However, results showed that participants searched for the gain color target more than the gain-loss color target, suggesting stronger attentional control for the gain color than the gain-loss color. In Experiment 2, even though the expected value of the gain-loss color was greater than that of the gain color, attention was allocated to the gain color more than to the gain-loss color. The results imply that attentional control can operate in accordance with the loss aversion principle when the boundary conditions for loss aversion in a repeated binary decision-making task were met.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1069-9384</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1531-5320</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1</identifier><identifier>PMID: 37040019</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Springer US</publisher><subject>Affect ; Attention ; Behavioral Science and Psychology ; Brief Report ; Cognitive Psychology ; Color Perception ; Decision making ; Economic theory ; Expected values ; Experiments ; Humans ; Principles ; Psychology ; Reaction Time ; Reward ; Values</subject><ispartof>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review, 2023-10, Vol.30 (5), p.1887-1894</ispartof><rights>The Psychonomic Society, Inc. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><rights>2023. The Psychonomic Society, Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright Springer Nature B.V. Oct 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c076dd9c7a84fb4f713a250e44326edeece6a0ae9d188f7b894961fdc55d56e73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37040019$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Melissa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yang Seok</creatorcontrib><title>Loss aversion in the control of attention</title><title>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</title><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><description>Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each trial, a red target and a green target were presented simultaneously, and participants were free to search for either one. Participants always gained points when they searched for a gain color target (e.g., red). However, they gained or lost points when they searched for a gain-loss color target (e.g., green). In Experiment 1, the expected values of the gain color and the gain-loss color were equal. Therefore, for maximizing the reward, participants did not need to preferably search for a particular color. However, results showed that participants searched for the gain color target more than the gain-loss color target, suggesting stronger attentional control for the gain color than the gain-loss color. In Experiment 2, even though the expected value of the gain-loss color was greater than that of the gain color, attention was allocated to the gain color more than to the gain-loss color. The results imply that attentional control can operate in accordance with the loss aversion principle when the boundary conditions for loss aversion in a repeated binary decision-making task were met.</description><subject>Affect</subject><subject>Attention</subject><subject>Behavioral Science and Psychology</subject><subject>Brief Report</subject><subject>Cognitive Psychology</subject><subject>Color Perception</subject><subject>Decision making</subject><subject>Economic theory</subject><subject>Expected values</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Principles</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Reaction Time</subject><subject>Reward</subject><subject>Values</subject><issn>1069-9384</issn><issn>1531-5320</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9UEtLAzEQDqLYWv0DHmTBk4fVyTs5iviCghc9h3R3VlvaTU1SwX9v7Fa9eRhm4HsxHyGnFC65luYqUS4Yr2E7zOia7pExlZzWkjPYLzcoW1tuxIgcpbQAAKmsOiQjrkEAUDsmF9OQUuU_MKZ56Kt5X-U3rJrQ5xiWVegqnzP2uWDH5KDzy4Qnuz0hL3e3zzcP9fTp_vHmelo3nOtcN6BV29pGeyO6meg05Z5JQCE4U9giNqg8eLQtNabTM2OFVbRrGylbqVDzCTkffNcxvG8wZbcIm9iXSMcsMCg2HAqLDawmlgcidm4d5ysfPx0F992OG9pxsJ3SjqNFdLaz3sxW2P5KfuooBD4QUoH6V4x_2f_YfgEZA25-</recordid><startdate>20231001</startdate><enddate>20231001</enddate><creator>Kim, Sunghyun</creator><creator>Beck, Melissa R.</creator><creator>Cho, Yang Seok</creator><general>Springer US</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>4T-</scope><scope>4U-</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20231001</creationdate><title>Loss aversion in the control of attention</title><author>Kim, Sunghyun ; Beck, Melissa R. ; Cho, Yang Seok</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c076dd9c7a84fb4f713a250e44326edeece6a0ae9d188f7b894961fdc55d56e73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Affect</topic><topic>Attention</topic><topic>Behavioral Science and Psychology</topic><topic>Brief Report</topic><topic>Cognitive Psychology</topic><topic>Color Perception</topic><topic>Decision making</topic><topic>Economic theory</topic><topic>Expected values</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Principles</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Reaction Time</topic><topic>Reward</topic><topic>Values</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kim, Sunghyun</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Beck, Melissa R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Yang Seok</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Docstoc</collection><collection>University Readers</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Proquest)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kim, Sunghyun</au><au>Beck, Melissa R.</au><au>Cho, Yang Seok</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Loss aversion in the control of attention</atitle><jtitle>Psychonomic bulletin &amp; review</jtitle><stitle>Psychon Bull Rev</stitle><addtitle>Psychon Bull Rev</addtitle><date>2023-10-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1887</spage><epage>1894</epage><pages>1887-1894</pages><issn>1069-9384</issn><eissn>1531-5320</eissn><abstract>Loss aversion is a psychological bias where an increase in loss is perceived as being larger than an equivalent increase in gain. In the present study, two experiments were conducted to explore whether attentional control reflects loss aversion. Participants performed a visual search task. On each trial, a red target and a green target were presented simultaneously, and participants were free to search for either one. Participants always gained points when they searched for a gain color target (e.g., red). However, they gained or lost points when they searched for a gain-loss color target (e.g., green). In Experiment 1, the expected values of the gain color and the gain-loss color were equal. Therefore, for maximizing the reward, participants did not need to preferably search for a particular color. However, results showed that participants searched for the gain color target more than the gain-loss color target, suggesting stronger attentional control for the gain color than the gain-loss color. In Experiment 2, even though the expected value of the gain-loss color was greater than that of the gain color, attention was allocated to the gain color more than to the gain-loss color. The results imply that attentional control can operate in accordance with the loss aversion principle when the boundary conditions for loss aversion in a repeated binary decision-making task were met.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Springer US</pub><pmid>37040019</pmid><doi>10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1</doi><tpages>8</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1069-9384
ispartof Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023-10, Vol.30 (5), p.1887-1894
issn 1069-9384
1531-5320
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2902032630
source Springer Link
subjects Affect
Attention
Behavioral Science and Psychology
Brief Report
Cognitive Psychology
Color Perception
Decision making
Economic theory
Expected values
Experiments
Humans
Principles
Psychology
Reaction Time
Reward
Values
title Loss aversion in the control of attention
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-05T01%3A37%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Loss%20aversion%20in%20the%20control%20of%20attention&rft.jtitle=Psychonomic%20bulletin%20&%20review&rft.au=Kim,%20Sunghyun&rft.date=2023-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1887&rft.epage=1894&rft.pages=1887-1894&rft.issn=1069-9384&rft.eissn=1531-5320&rft_id=info:doi/10.3758/s13423-023-02287-1&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2902032630%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c337t-c076dd9c7a84fb4f713a250e44326edeece6a0ae9d188f7b894961fdc55d56e73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2902032630&rft_id=info:pmid/37040019&rfr_iscdi=true