Loading…

50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients

Objective:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychologi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society 2023-11, Vol.29 (s1), p.836-837
Main Authors: Gamboa, Bruno N., Hodges, Kathleen, Gee, Stephanie C., Madore, Michelle R., Philip, Noah S., Andrew Kozel, F., Walker, Nicole C.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 837
container_issue s1
container_start_page 836
container_title Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society
container_volume 29
creator Gamboa, Bruno N.
Hodges, Kathleen
Gee, Stephanie C.
Madore, Michelle R.
Philip, Noah S.
Andrew Kozel, F.
Walker, Nicole C.
description Objective:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.Participants and Methods:Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.Results:The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p
doi_str_mv 10.1017/S1355617723010366
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2904195421</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><cupid>10_1017_S1355617723010366</cupid><sourcerecordid>2904195421</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1576-c77150d5b06b83c3e490f72a77296c3fef824f496a0bddc95e01e8ac66026f743</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UE1PAjEQbYwmIvoDvDXxvDqz3ba7RwQ_SCCSgAdPm263xRLYxXY58O8tQuLBeHqTmffezDxCbhHuEVA-zJFxLlDKlAECE-KM9DATRSKFwPNYx3FymF-SqxBWAMgQoEc-ONDH-TjBnKpAFZ0aFXbe0NbSWdjrz3bdLp1WazpyofMmBDrQvo0wctYab5qOjtqNck2grqGL6ZzOVOdiO1yTC6vWwdycsE_en58Ww9dk8vYyHg4miUYuRaKlRA41r0BUOdPMZAVYmar4SSE0s8bmaWazQiio6loX3ACaXGkhIBVWZqxP7o6-W99-7UzoylW7801cWaYFZFjwLMXIwiPr53pvbLn1bqP8vkQoDwmWfxKMGnbSqE3lXb00v9b_q74BexZvvA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904195421</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Gamboa, Bruno N. ; Hodges, Kathleen ; Gee, Stephanie C. ; Madore, Michelle R. ; Philip, Noah S. ; Andrew Kozel, F. ; Walker, Nicole C.</creator><creatorcontrib>Gamboa, Bruno N. ; Hodges, Kathleen ; Gee, Stephanie C. ; Madore, Michelle R. ; Philip, Noah S. ; Andrew Kozel, F. ; Walker, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><description><![CDATA[Objective:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.Participants and Methods:Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.Results:The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p<.001).Conclusions:The BSI-18 can detect changes in different domains of psychological distress as a function of TMS treatment. Unexpectedly, TMS patients with elevated levels of anxiety responded well to treatment despite comorbid anxiety often being associated with less favorable outcomes in treatment trials. The positive relationship of the BSI-D and PHQ-9 before and after treatment suggests the use of the BSI as a valid, additional measure of depressive symptoms.]]></description><identifier>ISSN: 1355-6177</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1469-7661</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/S1355617723010366</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Anxiety ; Clinical trials ; Cognitive ability ; Magnetic fields ; Mental depression ; Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders ; Patients ; Poster Session 09: Psychiatric Disorders | Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders | Addiction | Social Cognition | Cognitive Neuroscience | Emotional and Social Processing ; Statistical analysis ; Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><ispartof>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2023-11, Vol.29 (s1), p.836-837</ispartof><rights>Copyright © INS. Published by Cambridge University Press, 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1355617723010366/type/journal_article$$EHTML$$P50$$Gcambridge$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27903,27904,72706</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Gamboa, Bruno N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madore, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew Kozel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><title>50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients</title><title>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</title><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><description><![CDATA[Objective:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.Participants and Methods:Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.Results:The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p<.001).Conclusions:The BSI-18 can detect changes in different domains of psychological distress as a function of TMS treatment. Unexpectedly, TMS patients with elevated levels of anxiety responded well to treatment despite comorbid anxiety often being associated with less favorable outcomes in treatment trials. The positive relationship of the BSI-D and PHQ-9 before and after treatment suggests the use of the BSI as a valid, additional measure of depressive symptoms.]]></description><subject>Anxiety</subject><subject>Clinical trials</subject><subject>Cognitive ability</subject><subject>Magnetic fields</subject><subject>Mental depression</subject><subject>Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders</subject><subject>Patients</subject><subject>Poster Session 09: Psychiatric Disorders | Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders | Addiction | Social Cognition | Cognitive Neuroscience | Emotional and Social Processing</subject><subject>Statistical analysis</subject><subject>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</subject><issn>1355-6177</issn><issn>1469-7661</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UE1PAjEQbYwmIvoDvDXxvDqz3ba7RwQ_SCCSgAdPm263xRLYxXY58O8tQuLBeHqTmffezDxCbhHuEVA-zJFxLlDKlAECE-KM9DATRSKFwPNYx3FymF-SqxBWAMgQoEc-ONDH-TjBnKpAFZ0aFXbe0NbSWdjrz3bdLp1WazpyofMmBDrQvo0wctYab5qOjtqNck2grqGL6ZzOVOdiO1yTC6vWwdycsE_en58Ww9dk8vYyHg4miUYuRaKlRA41r0BUOdPMZAVYmar4SSE0s8bmaWazQiio6loX3ACaXGkhIBVWZqxP7o6-W99-7UzoylW7801cWaYFZFjwLMXIwiPr53pvbLn1bqP8vkQoDwmWfxKMGnbSqE3lXb00v9b_q74BexZvvA</recordid><startdate>202311</startdate><enddate>202311</enddate><creator>Gamboa, Bruno N.</creator><creator>Hodges, Kathleen</creator><creator>Gee, Stephanie C.</creator><creator>Madore, Michelle R.</creator><creator>Philip, Noah S.</creator><creator>Andrew Kozel, F.</creator><creator>Walker, Nicole C.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope></search><sort><creationdate>202311</creationdate><title>50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients</title><author>Gamboa, Bruno N. ; Hodges, Kathleen ; Gee, Stephanie C. ; Madore, Michelle R. ; Philip, Noah S. ; Andrew Kozel, F. ; Walker, Nicole C.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1576-c77150d5b06b83c3e490f72a77296c3fef824f496a0bddc95e01e8ac66026f743</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Anxiety</topic><topic>Clinical trials</topic><topic>Cognitive ability</topic><topic>Magnetic fields</topic><topic>Mental depression</topic><topic>Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders</topic><topic>Patients</topic><topic>Poster Session 09: Psychiatric Disorders | Mood &amp; Anxiety Disorders | Addiction | Social Cognition | Cognitive Neuroscience | Emotional and Social Processing</topic><topic>Statistical analysis</topic><topic>Transcranial magnetic stimulation</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gamboa, Bruno N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hodges, Kathleen</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gee, Stephanie C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Madore, Michelle R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Philip, Noah S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andrew Kozel, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, Nicole C.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Databases</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>Psychology Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gamboa, Bruno N.</au><au>Hodges, Kathleen</au><au>Gee, Stephanie C.</au><au>Madore, Michelle R.</au><au>Philip, Noah S.</au><au>Andrew Kozel, F.</au><au>Walker, Nicole C.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients</atitle><jtitle>Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society</jtitle><addtitle>J Int Neuropsychol Soc</addtitle><date>2023-11</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>s1</issue><spage>836</spage><epage>837</epage><pages>836-837</pages><issn>1355-6177</issn><eissn>1469-7661</eissn><abstract><![CDATA[Objective:Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an effective treatment for individuals with pharmacoresistant major depressive disorder (MDD), yet identifying which patients best respond remains an important area of inquiry. The Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI-18) serves as a screen for psychological distress, providing measures across three separate domains (e.g., somatization, depression, and anxiety) and one composite score (i.e., global severity index). The psychometric properties of the BSI-18 have been validated across multiple studies; however, it has sparsely been used to track changes in patient symptoms in response to intervention. Assessing patient symptom severity across these domains is imperative since these symptoms can negatively influence cognitive functioning. Accordingly, the current study utilized the BSI-18 to measure psychological distress across these different domains in patients receiving TMS treatment. We hypothesized that all domains of the BSI-18 would see a significant decrease after treatment, that elevated scores in specific domains would predict a less favorable response to treatment, and that measurement of depressive symptoms will be consistent across measures of similar scope.Participants and Methods:Veterans (n=94) with MDD and met standard clinical TMS criteria were administered the BSI-18 before and after receiving an adequate dose of treatment (e.g., 30 sessions). Paired Samples T-test were used to compare the pre-treatment and post-treatment scores across domains.Results:The results of paired sample t-tests indicated a statistically significant reduction in measures of global psychological distress (t(93) = 7.99, p < .001, Cohen's d =.82), as well as depressive (t(93) = 8.34, p < .001, d = .86), anxious (t(93) = 7.64, p < .001, d = .79), and somatic symptoms (t(92) = 5.29, p < .001, d = .55) after receiving treatment. Individuals with elevated levels of anxiety (e.g., BSI-A>63) saw a significant reduction in depressive (t(62) = 8.15, p < .001, d = 1.03), anxious (t(62) = 8.34, p < .001, d = 1.05) and somatic (t(61) = 4.94, p < .001, d = .63) symptoms. Lastly, two measures of depressive symptoms, the BSI-D and PHQ-9, had a statistically significant strong, positive relationship before (r=.66) and after (r=.88) treatment (all n=65 and p<.001).Conclusions:The BSI-18 can detect changes in different domains of psychological distress as a function of TMS treatment. Unexpectedly, TMS patients with elevated levels of anxiety responded well to treatment despite comorbid anxiety often being associated with less favorable outcomes in treatment trials. The positive relationship of the BSI-D and PHQ-9 before and after treatment suggests the use of the BSI as a valid, additional measure of depressive symptoms.]]></abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/S1355617723010366</doi><tpages>2</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1355-6177
ispartof Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 2023-11, Vol.29 (s1), p.836-837
issn 1355-6177
1469-7661
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2904195421
source Cambridge University Press
subjects Anxiety
Clinical trials
Cognitive ability
Magnetic fields
Mental depression
Mood & Anxiety Disorders
Patients
Poster Session 09: Psychiatric Disorders | Mood & Anxiety Disorders | Addiction | Social Cognition | Cognitive Neuroscience | Emotional and Social Processing
Statistical analysis
Transcranial magnetic stimulation
title 50 BSI-18 as a Measure of Psychological Distress Across Different Domains in TMS Patients
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T23%3A02%3A28IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=50%20BSI-18%20as%20a%20Measure%20of%20Psychological%20Distress%20Across%20Different%20Domains%20in%20TMS%20Patients&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20the%20International%20Neuropsychological%20Society&rft.au=Gamboa,%20Bruno%20N.&rft.date=2023-11&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=s1&rft.spage=836&rft.epage=837&rft.pages=836-837&rft.issn=1355-6177&rft.eissn=1469-7661&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/S1355617723010366&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2904195421%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1576-c77150d5b06b83c3e490f72a77296c3fef824f496a0bddc95e01e8ac66026f743%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904195421&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_cupid=10_1017_S1355617723010366&rfr_iscdi=true