Loading…
When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook
Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susce...
Saved in:
Published in: | arXiv.org 2024-06 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | arXiv.org |
container_volume | |
creator | Jiang, Wenzhao Liu, Hao Xiong, Hui |
description | Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susceptibility to distribution shift, biases towards certain populations, and lack of explainability. Recently, integrating causal learning techniques into GNNs has sparked numerous ground-breaking studies since many GNN trustworthiness issues can be alleviated by capturing the underlying data causality rather than superficial correlations. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent research efforts on Causality-Inspired GNNs (CIGNNs). Specifically, we first employ causal tools to analyze the primary trustworthiness risks of existing GNNs, underscoring the necessity for GNNs to comprehend the causal mechanisms within graph data. Moreover, we introduce a taxonomy of CIGNNs based on the type of causal learning capability they are equipped with, i.e., causal reasoning and causal representation learning. Besides, we systematically introduce typical methods within each category and discuss how they mitigate trustworthiness risks. Finally, we summarize useful resources and discuss several future directions, hoping to shed light on new research opportunities in this emerging field. The representative papers, along with open-source data and codes, are available in https://github.com/usail-hkust/Causality-Inspired-GNNs. |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2904561575</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2904561575</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-proquest_journals_29045615753</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWLR3CLi1kCZNq-6k-NloN6LLEmi0n5AX80G8vV14AFfDMDNBEWUsTdYZpTMUO9cTQmheUM5ZhG73Vmp8tMK0-CKDFWqEf4Md8FlK73ApghOq858trowB64PufCfdauy-hQYUPEfFQjd4p3EVvAIYFmj6EMrJ-Mc5Wh721_KUGAuvIJ2vewhWj6mmG5LxPOUFZ_9dX-e5QQI</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2904561575</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook</title><source>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Jiang, Wenzhao ; Liu, Hao ; Xiong, Hui</creator><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenzhao ; Liu, Hao ; Xiong, Hui</creatorcontrib><description>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susceptibility to distribution shift, biases towards certain populations, and lack of explainability. Recently, integrating causal learning techniques into GNNs has sparked numerous ground-breaking studies since many GNN trustworthiness issues can be alleviated by capturing the underlying data causality rather than superficial correlations. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent research efforts on Causality-Inspired GNNs (CIGNNs). Specifically, we first employ causal tools to analyze the primary trustworthiness risks of existing GNNs, underscoring the necessity for GNNs to comprehend the causal mechanisms within graph data. Moreover, we introduce a taxonomy of CIGNNs based on the type of causal learning capability they are equipped with, i.e., causal reasoning and causal representation learning. Besides, we systematically introduce typical methods within each category and discuss how they mitigate trustworthiness risks. Finally, we summarize useful resources and discuss several future directions, hoping to shed light on new research opportunities in this emerging field. The representative papers, along with open-source data and codes, are available in https://github.com/usail-hkust/Causality-Inspired-GNNs.</description><identifier>EISSN: 2331-8422</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ithaca: Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</publisher><subject>Causality ; Graph neural networks ; Machine learning ; Neural networks ; Representations ; Structured data ; Taxonomy ; Trustworthiness</subject><ispartof>arXiv.org, 2024-06</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is published under http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2904561575?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>780,784,25753,37012,44590</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Hui</creatorcontrib><title>When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook</title><title>arXiv.org</title><description>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susceptibility to distribution shift, biases towards certain populations, and lack of explainability. Recently, integrating causal learning techniques into GNNs has sparked numerous ground-breaking studies since many GNN trustworthiness issues can be alleviated by capturing the underlying data causality rather than superficial correlations. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent research efforts on Causality-Inspired GNNs (CIGNNs). Specifically, we first employ causal tools to analyze the primary trustworthiness risks of existing GNNs, underscoring the necessity for GNNs to comprehend the causal mechanisms within graph data. Moreover, we introduce a taxonomy of CIGNNs based on the type of causal learning capability they are equipped with, i.e., causal reasoning and causal representation learning. Besides, we systematically introduce typical methods within each category and discuss how they mitigate trustworthiness risks. Finally, we summarize useful resources and discuss several future directions, hoping to shed light on new research opportunities in this emerging field. The representative papers, along with open-source data and codes, are available in https://github.com/usail-hkust/Causality-Inspired-GNNs.</description><subject>Causality</subject><subject>Graph neural networks</subject><subject>Machine learning</subject><subject>Neural networks</subject><subject>Representations</subject><subject>Structured data</subject><subject>Taxonomy</subject><subject>Trustworthiness</subject><issn>2331-8422</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMgWLR3CLi1kCZNq-6k-NloN6LLEmi0n5AX80G8vV14AFfDMDNBEWUsTdYZpTMUO9cTQmheUM5ZhG73Vmp8tMK0-CKDFWqEf4Md8FlK73ApghOq858trowB64PufCfdauy-hQYUPEfFQjd4p3EVvAIYFmj6EMrJ-Mc5Wh721_KUGAuvIJ2vewhWj6mmG5LxPOUFZ_9dX-e5QQI</recordid><startdate>20240618</startdate><enddate>20240618</enddate><creator>Jiang, Wenzhao</creator><creator>Liu, Hao</creator><creator>Xiong, Hui</creator><general>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</general><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>L6V</scope><scope>M7S</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PTHSS</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20240618</creationdate><title>When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook</title><author>Jiang, Wenzhao ; Liu, Hao ; Xiong, Hui</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_29045615753</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Causality</topic><topic>Graph neural networks</topic><topic>Machine learning</topic><topic>Neural networks</topic><topic>Representations</topic><topic>Structured data</topic><topic>Taxonomy</topic><topic>Trustworthiness</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Jiang, Wenzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Hao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Xiong, Hui</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science & Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Engineering Collection</collection><collection>Engineering Database</collection><collection>ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>Engineering Collection</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Jiang, Wenzhao</au><au>Liu, Hao</au><au>Xiong, Hui</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook</atitle><jtitle>arXiv.org</jtitle><date>2024-06-18</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2331-8422</eissn><abstract>Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have emerged as powerful representation learning tools for capturing complex dependencies within diverse graph-structured data. Despite their success in a wide range of graph mining tasks, GNNs have raised serious concerns regarding their trustworthiness, including susceptibility to distribution shift, biases towards certain populations, and lack of explainability. Recently, integrating causal learning techniques into GNNs has sparked numerous ground-breaking studies since many GNN trustworthiness issues can be alleviated by capturing the underlying data causality rather than superficial correlations. In this survey, we comprehensively review recent research efforts on Causality-Inspired GNNs (CIGNNs). Specifically, we first employ causal tools to analyze the primary trustworthiness risks of existing GNNs, underscoring the necessity for GNNs to comprehend the causal mechanisms within graph data. Moreover, we introduce a taxonomy of CIGNNs based on the type of causal learning capability they are equipped with, i.e., causal reasoning and causal representation learning. Besides, we systematically introduce typical methods within each category and discuss how they mitigate trustworthiness risks. Finally, we summarize useful resources and discuss several future directions, hoping to shed light on new research opportunities in this emerging field. The representative papers, along with open-source data and codes, are available in https://github.com/usail-hkust/Causality-Inspired-GNNs.</abstract><cop>Ithaca</cop><pub>Cornell University Library, arXiv.org</pub><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2331-8422 |
ispartof | arXiv.org, 2024-06 |
issn | 2331-8422 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2904561575 |
source | ProQuest - Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Causality Graph neural networks Machine learning Neural networks Representations Structured data Taxonomy Trustworthiness |
title | When Graph Neural Network Meets Causality: Opportunities, Methodologies and An Outlook |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A26%3A26IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=When%20Graph%20Neural%20Network%20Meets%20Causality:%20Opportunities,%20Methodologies%20and%20An%20Outlook&rft.jtitle=arXiv.org&rft.au=Jiang,%20Wenzhao&rft.date=2024-06-18&rft.eissn=2331-8422&rft_id=info:doi/&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2904561575%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-proquest_journals_29045615753%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2904561575&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |