Evaluating agile methodologies for software quality using statistical parameters

The software business must prioritise the development of high-quality software products because consumers’ perceptions of software quality are crucial, and focusing on product quality makes it easier for users to become used to the product. As a result, maintaining a system’s quality is essential fo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Saini, Neha, Chhabra, Indu, Guleria, Ajay
Format: Conference Proceeding
Language:English
Subjects:
Error analysis
Evaluation
Quality assessment
Software development
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:The software business must prioritise the development of high-quality software products because consumers’ perceptions of software quality are crucial, and focusing on product quality makes it easier for users to become used to the product. As a result, maintaining a system’s quality is essential for its success. The quality of a software product is influenced by a wide range of elements and variables, both directly and indirectly. As a result, the quality cannot be assessed using only one factor. With the passage of time, a number of agile software development methodologies have developed around the world, which helps to produce new and improved software methodologies. This paper makes an effort to evaluate and contrast SWARA, FCRI, and DDA, three agile focused development methodologies. Mean Squared Error and Standard Deviation, two statistical measures, were used in the evaluation.
ISSN:0094-243X
1551-7616
DOI:10.1063/5.0182610