Loading…
A comparative study of CT-based volumetric assessment methods for total lung capacity with the development of an adjustment factor: incorporating VR imaging for improved accuracy
Physiological methods for measuring total lung capacity (TLC), including body-box plethysmography (BBP), are costly and require specialized expertise. Computed tomography (CT)-based TLC assessment is essential in clinical practice for candidates of lung transplantation and those unable to undergo st...
Saved in:
Published in: | Virtual reality : the journal of the Virtual Reality Society 2024-03, Vol.28 (1), p.2, Article 2 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Physiological methods for measuring total lung capacity (TLC), including body-box plethysmography (BBP), are costly and require specialized expertise. Computed tomography (CT)-based TLC assessment is essential in clinical practice for candidates of lung transplantation and those unable to undergo standard lung function testing. While CT-based algorithms were studied to estimate TLC, their accuracy should be further evaluated. This study aimed to compare the BBP measurement of TLC (TLCpleth) with three CT-based methods for measuring TLC, one of them is an innovative virtual reality (VR)-based method. Additionally, we aimed to develop an adjustment factor that will allow a new, non-invasive, cost-effective estimation of the TLCpleth. TLC was calculated for 24 adult patients using three different CT-based volumetric assessment methods: an older region-growing algorithm (TLCrg), a more recent convolutional neural network-based algorithm (TLCcnn), and a VR-based method (TLCvr). Agreement between each method and TLCpleth was evaluated, and an adjustment factor was developed using linear regression. The correlation between the three CT-based methods and TLCpleth ranged from 0.91 to 0.92 (
p
  |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1359-4338 1434-9957 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10055-023-00892-y |