Loading…
Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams
Many headwaters across temperate North America have uniform mid‐succession riparian forests recovering from historic land clearing. These young riparian stands contrast with late‐succession forests, which have complex structural characteristics including canopy gaps. Canopy gaps provide structural d...
Saved in:
Published in: | Restoration ecology 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.n/a |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-bddcc26b74ce7003226c8f3b2767b8effeab66b00f4496b8aa6779f6c10f73113 |
container_end_page | n/a |
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Restoration ecology |
container_volume | 32 |
creator | Swartz, Allison Warren, Dana |
description | Many headwaters across temperate North America have uniform mid‐succession riparian forests recovering from historic land clearing. These young riparian stands contrast with late‐succession forests, which have complex structural characteristics including canopy gaps. Canopy gaps provide structural diversity that can be important for terrestrial species, and they are also hypothesized to be important features for aquatic environments. The light patches below gaps create productivity hotspots in streams and therefore create potential for increased stream apex predator abundances through bottom‐up food web drivers. However, increasing light may also affect stream temperature, a consideration for coldwater fish (salmonids). We established an experimental before‐after control‐impact study to explicitly assess how creating canopy gaps in the riparian forest affects the abundance and biomass of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in paired reference and treatment reaches at five replicate streams. Gaps were designed to resemble those in old‐growth forests in the treatment reach of each system although wood was explicitly left out of the stream. At four of five sites, we found small and generally consistent positive responses in adult cutthroat trout and total vertebrate biomass to localized increases in light but only 2 years after treatment. Results suggest that opening riparian canopies adjacent to streams via gaps is a viable tool to enhance structural complexity of riparian forests without negatively impacting stream vertebrates; however, a single gap alone had small effects on aquatic vertebrates. More or larger gaps would likely be needed to notably enhance aquatic apex predators. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1111/rec.14014 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2909313220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2909313220</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-bddcc26b74ce7003226c8f3b2767b8effeab66b00f4496b8aa6779f6c10f73113</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ9ltsnuU0qpQEETBW5jNJu2WNtkmW0r_vdH16lxmGL73ZniE3DOYsFTTYPSEFcCKCzJiMy4yBvB1mWYQLOOVZNfkJsYtAJuVZT4ibtnGDUXXUDwcsW81jbjDfVqYQIOJnXfRRNp72m8M1cEkxjvqLQ1th6FFRzU6353pGrtIcefdmlqflL1p6MZgc8I-WcU-SffxllxZ3EVz99fH5HO5-Ji_ZKu359f50yrTvOJFVjeN1lzUstBGAuScC13avOZSyLo01hqshagBbFFUoi4RhZSVFZqBlTlj-Zg8DL5d8IdjekZt_TG4dFLxCqqcJUtI1ONA6eBjDMaqLrR7DGfFQP3EqVKc6jfOxE4H9tTuzPl_UL0v5oPiG8jgeCM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2909313220</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams</title><source>Wiley</source><creator>Swartz, Allison ; Warren, Dana</creator><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Allison ; Warren, Dana</creatorcontrib><description>Many headwaters across temperate North America have uniform mid‐succession riparian forests recovering from historic land clearing. These young riparian stands contrast with late‐succession forests, which have complex structural characteristics including canopy gaps. Canopy gaps provide structural diversity that can be important for terrestrial species, and they are also hypothesized to be important features for aquatic environments. The light patches below gaps create productivity hotspots in streams and therefore create potential for increased stream apex predator abundances through bottom‐up food web drivers. However, increasing light may also affect stream temperature, a consideration for coldwater fish (salmonids). We established an experimental before‐after control‐impact study to explicitly assess how creating canopy gaps in the riparian forest affects the abundance and biomass of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in paired reference and treatment reaches at five replicate streams. Gaps were designed to resemble those in old‐growth forests in the treatment reach of each system although wood was explicitly left out of the stream. At four of five sites, we found small and generally consistent positive responses in adult cutthroat trout and total vertebrate biomass to localized increases in light but only 2 years after treatment. Results suggest that opening riparian canopies adjacent to streams via gaps is a viable tool to enhance structural complexity of riparian forests without negatively impacting stream vertebrates; however, a single gap alone had small effects on aquatic vertebrates. More or larger gaps would likely be needed to notably enhance aquatic apex predators.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1061-2971</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1526-100X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/rec.14014</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, USA: Wiley Periodicals, Inc</publisher><subject>Aquatic environment ; Aquatic reptiles ; Biomass ; Canopies ; Canopy ; canopy gap ; Canopy gaps ; coastal cutthroat trout ; Complexity ; Fish ; Food chains ; Food webs ; Forests ; forest‐stream interactions ; Headwaters ; HJ Andrews Experimental Forest ; Land clearance ; Land clearing ; Light ; Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii ; Pacific giant salamander ; Plant cover ; Predators ; riparian forest ; Riparian forests ; Riparian land ; Rivers ; Salmon ; Salmonids ; Streams ; Trout ; Vertebrates ; Water temperature</subject><ispartof>Restoration ecology, 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.n/a</ispartof><rights>2023 Society for Ecological Restoration.</rights><rights>2024 Society for Ecological Restoration</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-bddcc26b74ce7003226c8f3b2767b8effeab66b00f4496b8aa6779f6c10f73113</cites><orcidid>0000-0001-5282-7972 ; 0000-0002-2006-1455</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail></links><search><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Dana</creatorcontrib><title>Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams</title><title>Restoration ecology</title><description>Many headwaters across temperate North America have uniform mid‐succession riparian forests recovering from historic land clearing. These young riparian stands contrast with late‐succession forests, which have complex structural characteristics including canopy gaps. Canopy gaps provide structural diversity that can be important for terrestrial species, and they are also hypothesized to be important features for aquatic environments. The light patches below gaps create productivity hotspots in streams and therefore create potential for increased stream apex predator abundances through bottom‐up food web drivers. However, increasing light may also affect stream temperature, a consideration for coldwater fish (salmonids). We established an experimental before‐after control‐impact study to explicitly assess how creating canopy gaps in the riparian forest affects the abundance and biomass of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in paired reference and treatment reaches at five replicate streams. Gaps were designed to resemble those in old‐growth forests in the treatment reach of each system although wood was explicitly left out of the stream. At four of five sites, we found small and generally consistent positive responses in adult cutthroat trout and total vertebrate biomass to localized increases in light but only 2 years after treatment. Results suggest that opening riparian canopies adjacent to streams via gaps is a viable tool to enhance structural complexity of riparian forests without negatively impacting stream vertebrates; however, a single gap alone had small effects on aquatic vertebrates. More or larger gaps would likely be needed to notably enhance aquatic apex predators.</description><subject>Aquatic environment</subject><subject>Aquatic reptiles</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Canopies</subject><subject>Canopy</subject><subject>canopy gap</subject><subject>Canopy gaps</subject><subject>coastal cutthroat trout</subject><subject>Complexity</subject><subject>Fish</subject><subject>Food chains</subject><subject>Food webs</subject><subject>Forests</subject><subject>forest‐stream interactions</subject><subject>Headwaters</subject><subject>HJ Andrews Experimental Forest</subject><subject>Land clearance</subject><subject>Land clearing</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii</subject><subject>Pacific giant salamander</subject><subject>Plant cover</subject><subject>Predators</subject><subject>riparian forest</subject><subject>Riparian forests</subject><subject>Riparian land</subject><subject>Rivers</subject><subject>Salmon</subject><subject>Salmonids</subject><subject>Streams</subject><subject>Trout</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>Water temperature</subject><issn>1061-2971</issn><issn>1526-100X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kEFLAzEQhYMoWKsH_0HAk4dtJ9ltsnuU0qpQEETBW5jNJu2WNtkmW0r_vdH16lxmGL73ZniE3DOYsFTTYPSEFcCKCzJiMy4yBvB1mWYQLOOVZNfkJsYtAJuVZT4ibtnGDUXXUDwcsW81jbjDfVqYQIOJnXfRRNp72m8M1cEkxjvqLQ1th6FFRzU6353pGrtIcefdmlqflL1p6MZgc8I-WcU-SffxllxZ3EVz99fH5HO5-Ji_ZKu359f50yrTvOJFVjeN1lzUstBGAuScC13avOZSyLo01hqshagBbFFUoi4RhZSVFZqBlTlj-Zg8DL5d8IdjekZt_TG4dFLxCqqcJUtI1ONA6eBjDMaqLrR7DGfFQP3EqVKc6jfOxE4H9tTuzPl_UL0v5oPiG8jgeCM</recordid><startdate>202401</startdate><enddate>202401</enddate><creator>Swartz, Allison</creator><creator>Warren, Dana</creator><general>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</general><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>H97</scope><scope>L.G</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-7972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-1455</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202401</creationdate><title>Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams</title><author>Swartz, Allison ; Warren, Dana</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-bddcc26b74ce7003226c8f3b2767b8effeab66b00f4496b8aa6779f6c10f73113</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Aquatic environment</topic><topic>Aquatic reptiles</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Canopies</topic><topic>Canopy</topic><topic>canopy gap</topic><topic>Canopy gaps</topic><topic>coastal cutthroat trout</topic><topic>Complexity</topic><topic>Fish</topic><topic>Food chains</topic><topic>Food webs</topic><topic>Forests</topic><topic>forest‐stream interactions</topic><topic>Headwaters</topic><topic>HJ Andrews Experimental Forest</topic><topic>Land clearance</topic><topic>Land clearing</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii</topic><topic>Pacific giant salamander</topic><topic>Plant cover</topic><topic>Predators</topic><topic>riparian forest</topic><topic>Riparian forests</topic><topic>Riparian land</topic><topic>Rivers</topic><topic>Salmon</topic><topic>Salmonids</topic><topic>Streams</topic><topic>Trout</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>Water temperature</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Swartz, Allison</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Warren, Dana</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 3: Aquatic Pollution & Environmental Quality</collection><collection>Aquatic Science & Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Swartz, Allison</au><au>Warren, Dana</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams</atitle><jtitle>Restoration ecology</jtitle><date>2024-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>32</volume><issue>1</issue><epage>n/a</epage><issn>1061-2971</issn><eissn>1526-100X</eissn><abstract>Many headwaters across temperate North America have uniform mid‐succession riparian forests recovering from historic land clearing. These young riparian stands contrast with late‐succession forests, which have complex structural characteristics including canopy gaps. Canopy gaps provide structural diversity that can be important for terrestrial species, and they are also hypothesized to be important features for aquatic environments. The light patches below gaps create productivity hotspots in streams and therefore create potential for increased stream apex predator abundances through bottom‐up food web drivers. However, increasing light may also affect stream temperature, a consideration for coldwater fish (salmonids). We established an experimental before‐after control‐impact study to explicitly assess how creating canopy gaps in the riparian forest affects the abundance and biomass of coastal cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii) and Pacific giant salamanders (Dicamptodon tenebrosus) in paired reference and treatment reaches at five replicate streams. Gaps were designed to resemble those in old‐growth forests in the treatment reach of each system although wood was explicitly left out of the stream. At four of five sites, we found small and generally consistent positive responses in adult cutthroat trout and total vertebrate biomass to localized increases in light but only 2 years after treatment. Results suggest that opening riparian canopies adjacent to streams via gaps is a viable tool to enhance structural complexity of riparian forests without negatively impacting stream vertebrates; however, a single gap alone had small effects on aquatic vertebrates. More or larger gaps would likely be needed to notably enhance aquatic apex predators.</abstract><cop>Malden, USA</cop><pub>Wiley Periodicals, Inc</pub><doi>10.1111/rec.14014</doi><tpages>13</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5282-7972</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2006-1455</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1061-2971 |
ispartof | Restoration ecology, 2024-01, Vol.32 (1), p.n/a |
issn | 1061-2971 1526-100X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2909313220 |
source | Wiley |
subjects | Aquatic environment Aquatic reptiles Biomass Canopies Canopy canopy gap Canopy gaps coastal cutthroat trout Complexity Fish Food chains Food webs Forests forest‐stream interactions Headwaters HJ Andrews Experimental Forest Land clearance Land clearing Light Oncorhynchus clarkii clarkii Pacific giant salamander Plant cover Predators riparian forest Riparian forests Riparian land Rivers Salmon Salmonids Streams Trout Vertebrates Water temperature |
title | Fish and aquatic salamander responses to the creation of riparian canopy gaps along forested headwater streams |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-03-06T03%3A24%3A14IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fish%20and%20aquatic%20salamander%20responses%20to%20the%20creation%20of%20riparian%20canopy%20gaps%20along%20forested%20headwater%20streams&rft.jtitle=Restoration%20ecology&rft.au=Swartz,%20Allison&rft.date=2024-01&rft.volume=32&rft.issue=1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.issn=1061-2971&rft.eissn=1526-100X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/rec.14014&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2909313220%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2924-bddcc26b74ce7003226c8f3b2767b8effeab66b00f4496b8aa6779f6c10f73113%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2909313220&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |