Incorporating coarse and fine recycled aggregates into concrete mixes: mechanical characterization and environmental impact

• Published in: Journal of material cycles and waste management 2024, Vol.26 (1), p.654-668
• Main Authors: Younes, Ammar, Elbeltagi, Emad, Diab, Aboelkasim, Tarsi, Giulia, Saeed, Fam, Sangiorgi, Cesare
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Aggregates; Civil Engineering; Compressive strength; Concrete aggregates; Concrete mixes; Construction industry wastes; Engineering; Environmental effects; Environmental impact; Environmental Management; Landfills; Life cycle analysis; Life cycle assessment; Life cycles; Mechanical properties; Natural resources; Raw materials; Recycled materials; Regional Case Study; Replacement level; Resource depletion; Tensile strength; Waste disposal; Waste disposal sites; Waste Management/Waste Technology; Workability
• ISSN: 1438-4957; 1611-8227
• DOI: 10.1007/s10163-023-01834-1

Concrete waste (CW) recycling stands as a promising strategy to promote sustainable construction practices. This research aims to assess the feasibility of using recycled concrete aggregates (RCA) as a surrogate for natural aggregates (NA) in concrete applications and reduce the environmental impact associated with the depletion of natural resources and landfill space. To achieve these objectives, CW was segregated from debris mixes of construction and demolition waste (CDW), collected, crushed, and graded to generate RCA. Thirty-two concrete samples were prepared and categorized into four distinct groups with 0% (reference), 50%, 75%, and 100% substitution levels for both coarse RCA (CRCA) and fine RCA (FRCA), all utilized simultaneously. Concurrently, the environmental impacts of producing 1 m 3 of concrete were evaluated using a life cycle assessment (LCA) approach, (cradle-to-gate) covering three phases, the raw material supply (A1), transportation (A2) and concrete production (A3). At the 50% replacement level, the mechanical properties of recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) demonstrated a 20.0% increase in splitting tensile strength, accompanied by marginal decrease in workability (15.0%) and compressive strength (6.0%). In addition, at that percentage, the average environmental effects were reduced by 31.3%, with specific reductions of 34.7% for A1, 40.3% for A2, and no change in A3.