Loading…
Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time
Smooth scouringrush is a creeping perennial with a high silica content in stems that may impede herbicide uptake. Smooth scouringrush has become a troublesome weed in no-till cropping systems across eastern Washington. In previous field studies, glyphosate provided inconsistent control of smooth sco...
Saved in:
Published in: | Weed technology 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.593-597 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913 |
container_end_page | 597 |
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 593 |
container_title | Weed technology |
container_volume | 37 |
creator | Savic, Marija Thorne, Mark E. Lyon, Drew J. |
description | Smooth scouringrush is a creeping perennial with a high silica content in stems that may impede herbicide uptake. Smooth scouringrush has become a troublesome weed in no-till cropping systems across eastern Washington. In previous field studies, glyphosate provided inconsistent control of smooth scouringrush. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate would improve the efficacy and consistency of control through stomatal flooding. To test this hypothesis, glyphosate was applied at three field sites at 3.78 kg ae ha–1 alone, with an organosilicone surfactant (OS1 or OS2), an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend, or an alcohol-based surfactant applied during the day or at night. Stem counts were recorded 1 yr after herbicide applications. Five of the six effective treatments observed across the three study sites included organosilicone surfactant or an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend. At two sites, when there was a difference in efficacy between application times; daytime applications were more effective than nighttime applications. These results support the hypothesis of stomatal flooding as a likely mechanism for enhanced efficacy of glyphosate with the addition of an organosilicone surfactant. However, at one site, the treatments containing organosilicone surfactant were more efficacious when applied at night than during the day. At this site, high daytime temperatures and low relative humidity may have resulted in rapid evaporation of spray droplets. The addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate is recommended for smooth scouringrush control, and daytime treatments are preferred but should be applied when temperatures and humidity are not conducive to rapid droplet drying. Further research is necessary to confirm that stomatal flooding is responsible for improved glyphosate efficacy. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; smooth scouringrush; Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun |
doi_str_mv | 10.1017/wet.2023.57 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2909383008</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2909383008</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAi0W2TjbNJjmK1A8oeFDB25Kk2W7KdrNNstb-e7fUs6d5D8_MyzwIXROYEiD8fmfTNIecThk_QSPCGGQ5n8EpGoGQkAHlX-foIsY1ACnyHEbo533jfapxNL4Prl2FPtb4dr7tXbSp3-BG2W-3UkOcYOPbFHyDd25YWDX7rvZRJYtdxKqqrEl2ifUexz5UyiTVJmxq74zFql1i1XWNMyo53-LkNvYSnVWqifbqb47R59P84_ElW7w9vz4-LDKdS5YyY6CApVDcGAoUGGipK14oxjkjRFNZCC240ZSLiljJtdCaWcHkjOnCSkLH6OZ4twt-29uYyvXwaTtUlrkESQUFEAN1d6RM8DEGW5VdcBsV9iWB8qC2HNSWB7Ul4wM9OdLaed_af9lftHF7_w</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2909383008</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time</title><source>Cambridge University Press</source><creator>Savic, Marija ; Thorne, Mark E. ; Lyon, Drew J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Savic, Marija ; Thorne, Mark E. ; Lyon, Drew J.</creatorcontrib><description>Smooth scouringrush is a creeping perennial with a high silica content in stems that may impede herbicide uptake. Smooth scouringrush has become a troublesome weed in no-till cropping systems across eastern Washington. In previous field studies, glyphosate provided inconsistent control of smooth scouringrush. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate would improve the efficacy and consistency of control through stomatal flooding. To test this hypothesis, glyphosate was applied at three field sites at 3.78 kg ae ha–1 alone, with an organosilicone surfactant (OS1 or OS2), an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend, or an alcohol-based surfactant applied during the day or at night. Stem counts were recorded 1 yr after herbicide applications. Five of the six effective treatments observed across the three study sites included organosilicone surfactant or an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend. At two sites, when there was a difference in efficacy between application times; daytime applications were more effective than nighttime applications. These results support the hypothesis of stomatal flooding as a likely mechanism for enhanced efficacy of glyphosate with the addition of an organosilicone surfactant. However, at one site, the treatments containing organosilicone surfactant were more efficacious when applied at night than during the day. At this site, high daytime temperatures and low relative humidity may have resulted in rapid evaporation of spray droplets. The addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate is recommended for smooth scouringrush control, and daytime treatments are preferred but should be applied when temperatures and humidity are not conducive to rapid droplet drying. Further research is necessary to confirm that stomatal flooding is responsible for improved glyphosate efficacy. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; smooth scouringrush; Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1017/wet.2023.57</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, USA: Cambridge University Press</publisher><subject>Binomial distribution ; Crop rotation ; Cropping systems ; Daytime ; Droplets ; Effectiveness ; Equisetum hyemale ; Equisetum laevigatum ; Evaporation ; Glyphosate ; herbicide uptake ; Herbicides ; Hypotheses ; Night ; No-till cropping ; Nozzles ; Organosilicone surfactants ; Relative humidity ; Silica ; silica content ; Stomata ; Surfactants ; Wheat</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.593-597</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the Weed Science Society of America</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-6306-324X ; 0000-0001-5039-0930 ; 0000-0002-9119-8002</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Savic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Drew J.</creatorcontrib><title>Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time</title><title>Weed technology</title><addtitle>Weed Technol</addtitle><description>Smooth scouringrush is a creeping perennial with a high silica content in stems that may impede herbicide uptake. Smooth scouringrush has become a troublesome weed in no-till cropping systems across eastern Washington. In previous field studies, glyphosate provided inconsistent control of smooth scouringrush. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate would improve the efficacy and consistency of control through stomatal flooding. To test this hypothesis, glyphosate was applied at three field sites at 3.78 kg ae ha–1 alone, with an organosilicone surfactant (OS1 or OS2), an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend, or an alcohol-based surfactant applied during the day or at night. Stem counts were recorded 1 yr after herbicide applications. Five of the six effective treatments observed across the three study sites included organosilicone surfactant or an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend. At two sites, when there was a difference in efficacy between application times; daytime applications were more effective than nighttime applications. These results support the hypothesis of stomatal flooding as a likely mechanism for enhanced efficacy of glyphosate with the addition of an organosilicone surfactant. However, at one site, the treatments containing organosilicone surfactant were more efficacious when applied at night than during the day. At this site, high daytime temperatures and low relative humidity may have resulted in rapid evaporation of spray droplets. The addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate is recommended for smooth scouringrush control, and daytime treatments are preferred but should be applied when temperatures and humidity are not conducive to rapid droplet drying. Further research is necessary to confirm that stomatal flooding is responsible for improved glyphosate efficacy. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; smooth scouringrush; Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun</description><subject>Binomial distribution</subject><subject>Crop rotation</subject><subject>Cropping systems</subject><subject>Daytime</subject><subject>Droplets</subject><subject>Effectiveness</subject><subject>Equisetum hyemale</subject><subject>Equisetum laevigatum</subject><subject>Evaporation</subject><subject>Glyphosate</subject><subject>herbicide uptake</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Hypotheses</subject><subject>Night</subject><subject>No-till cropping</subject><subject>Nozzles</subject><subject>Organosilicone surfactants</subject><subject>Relative humidity</subject><subject>Silica</subject><subject>silica content</subject><subject>Stomata</subject><subject>Surfactants</subject><subject>Wheat</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1LAzEQhoMoWKsn_0DAi0W2TjbNJjmK1A8oeFDB25Kk2W7KdrNNstb-e7fUs6d5D8_MyzwIXROYEiD8fmfTNIecThk_QSPCGGQ5n8EpGoGQkAHlX-foIsY1ACnyHEbo533jfapxNL4Prl2FPtb4dr7tXbSp3-BG2W-3UkOcYOPbFHyDd25YWDX7rvZRJYtdxKqqrEl2ifUexz5UyiTVJmxq74zFql1i1XWNMyo53-LkNvYSnVWqifbqb47R59P84_ElW7w9vz4-LDKdS5YyY6CApVDcGAoUGGipK14oxjkjRFNZCC240ZSLiljJtdCaWcHkjOnCSkLH6OZ4twt-29uYyvXwaTtUlrkESQUFEAN1d6RM8DEGW5VdcBsV9iWB8qC2HNSWB7Ul4wM9OdLaed_af9lftHF7_w</recordid><startdate>20231201</startdate><enddate>20231201</enddate><creator>Savic, Marija</creator><creator>Thorne, Mark E.</creator><creator>Lyon, Drew J.</creator><general>Cambridge University Press</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X2</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8G5</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AEUYN</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ATCPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>GUQSH</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M0K</scope><scope>M2O</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>MBDVC</scope><scope>PADUT</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-324X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-0930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-8002</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231201</creationdate><title>Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time</title><author>Savic, Marija ; Thorne, Mark E. ; Lyon, Drew J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Binomial distribution</topic><topic>Crop rotation</topic><topic>Cropping systems</topic><topic>Daytime</topic><topic>Droplets</topic><topic>Effectiveness</topic><topic>Equisetum hyemale</topic><topic>Equisetum laevigatum</topic><topic>Evaporation</topic><topic>Glyphosate</topic><topic>herbicide uptake</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Hypotheses</topic><topic>Night</topic><topic>No-till cropping</topic><topic>Nozzles</topic><topic>Organosilicone surfactants</topic><topic>Relative humidity</topic><topic>Silica</topic><topic>silica content</topic><topic>Stomata</topic><topic>Surfactants</topic><topic>Wheat</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Savic, Marija</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorne, Mark E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lyon, Drew J.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Agricultural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Research Library (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Sustainability</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Agriculture & Environmental Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>Research Library Prep</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Agriculture Science Database</collection><collection>ProQuest research library</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Research Library (Corporate)</collection><collection>Research Library China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Savic, Marija</au><au>Thorne, Mark E.</au><au>Lyon, Drew J.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><stitle>Weed Technol</stitle><date>2023-12-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>593</spage><epage>597</epage><pages>593-597</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><abstract>Smooth scouringrush is a creeping perennial with a high silica content in stems that may impede herbicide uptake. Smooth scouringrush has become a troublesome weed in no-till cropping systems across eastern Washington. In previous field studies, glyphosate provided inconsistent control of smooth scouringrush. The objective of this study was to determine if the addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate would improve the efficacy and consistency of control through stomatal flooding. To test this hypothesis, glyphosate was applied at three field sites at 3.78 kg ae ha–1 alone, with an organosilicone surfactant (OS1 or OS2), an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend, or an alcohol-based surfactant applied during the day or at night. Stem counts were recorded 1 yr after herbicide applications. Five of the six effective treatments observed across the three study sites included organosilicone surfactant or an organosilicone plus nonionic surfactant blend. At two sites, when there was a difference in efficacy between application times; daytime applications were more effective than nighttime applications. These results support the hypothesis of stomatal flooding as a likely mechanism for enhanced efficacy of glyphosate with the addition of an organosilicone surfactant. However, at one site, the treatments containing organosilicone surfactant were more efficacious when applied at night than during the day. At this site, high daytime temperatures and low relative humidity may have resulted in rapid evaporation of spray droplets. The addition of an organosilicone surfactant to glyphosate is recommended for smooth scouringrush control, and daytime treatments are preferred but should be applied when temperatures and humidity are not conducive to rapid droplet drying. Further research is necessary to confirm that stomatal flooding is responsible for improved glyphosate efficacy. Nomenclature: Glyphosate; smooth scouringrush; Equisetum laevigatum A. Braun</abstract><cop>New York, USA</cop><pub>Cambridge University Press</pub><doi>10.1017/wet.2023.57</doi><tpages>5</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6306-324X</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5039-0930</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9119-8002</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
ispartof | Weed technology, 2023-12, Vol.37 (6), p.593-597 |
issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2909383008 |
source | Cambridge University Press |
subjects | Binomial distribution Crop rotation Cropping systems Daytime Droplets Effectiveness Equisetum hyemale Equisetum laevigatum Evaporation Glyphosate herbicide uptake Herbicides Hypotheses Night No-till cropping Nozzles Organosilicone surfactants Relative humidity Silica silica content Stomata Surfactants Wheat |
title | Smooth scouringrush (Equisetum laevigatum) control with glyphosate is affected by surfactant choice and application time |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-01T10%3A57%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Smooth%20scouringrush%20(Equisetum%20laevigatum)%20control%20with%20glyphosate%20is%20affected%20by%20surfactant%20choice%20and%20application%20time&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Savic,%20Marija&rft.date=2023-12-01&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=593&rft.epage=597&rft.pages=593-597&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft_id=info:doi/10.1017/wet.2023.57&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2909383008%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-b295t-cc060d8a7cc303050b9bf76a577511b3968b87cb378f1e97b8bb5e85945b6e913%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2909383008&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |