Loading…

Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture

This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strate...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Anthropological notebooks 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86
Main Authors: Klataske, Ryan T, Ramos, Athena K
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue 2
container_start_page 86
container_title Anthropological notebooks
container_volume 29
creator Klataske, Ryan T
Ramos, Athena K
description This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.
doi_str_mv 10.5281/zenodo.10417679
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2912034385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2912034385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs1LxDAUxIMouK6evQY8eNmuSV7atN6krB-w4EXBW3ltXqRLv0xSYf3rLehl5jDDzI-xaym2qcrl3Q8Nox23UmhpMlOcsJVSoBIwMjtlK6lFnghQH-fsIoSDEGlhQK1YVY59T0PAro3HDfdtnLHbcBws99S0kx-bJbjnJcbYEXdE9oje8h4H_CQfbvm06ERNbL8p8HHgAR3FI2_mLs6eLtmZwy7Q1b-v2fvj7q18TvavTy_lwz6ZZA4xWWgUoHEAqcNaCyCpVWGtEw4FAmaOwOnUGp2ajOpa6aLJl1ZjM3SZs7BmN3-7C_HXTCFWh3H2w3JZqUIqARryFH4BDaBZAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2912034385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><creator>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</creator><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1408-032X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2232-3716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10417679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljublijana: Slovene Anthropological Society</publisher><subject>Cattle ; Cultural differences ; Ethnographic research ; Health initiatives ; Kinship ; Reciprocity ; Safety ; Sense of community ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Anthropological notebooks, 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86</ispartof><rights>Copyright Slovene Anthropological Society 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><title>Anthropological notebooks</title><description>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</description><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Ethnographic research</subject><subject>Health initiatives</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sense of community</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1408-032X</issn><issn>2232-3716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjs1LxDAUxIMouK6evQY8eNmuSV7atN6krB-w4EXBW3ltXqRLv0xSYf3rLehl5jDDzI-xaym2qcrl3Q8Nox23UmhpMlOcsJVSoBIwMjtlK6lFnghQH-fsIoSDEGlhQK1YVY59T0PAro3HDfdtnLHbcBws99S0kx-bJbjnJcbYEXdE9oje8h4H_CQfbvm06ERNbL8p8HHgAR3FI2_mLs6eLtmZwy7Q1b-v2fvj7q18TvavTy_lwz6ZZA4xWWgUoHEAqcNaCyCpVWGtEw4FAmaOwOnUGp2ajOpa6aLJl1ZjM3SZs7BmN3-7C_HXTCFWh3H2w3JZqUIqARryFH4BDaBZAQ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Klataske, Ryan T</creator><creator>Ramos, Athena K</creator><general>Slovene Anthropological Society</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><author>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Ethnographic research</topic><topic>Health initiatives</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sense of community</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Anthropological notebooks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klataske, Ryan T</au><au>Ramos, Athena K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</atitle><jtitle>Anthropological notebooks</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><pages>86-</pages><issn>1408-032X</issn><eissn>2232-3716</eissn><abstract>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</abstract><cop>Ljublijana</cop><pub>Slovene Anthropological Society</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.10417679</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1408-032X
ispartof Anthropological notebooks, 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86
issn 1408-032X
2232-3716
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2912034385
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text
subjects Cattle
Cultural differences
Ethnographic research
Health initiatives
Kinship
Reciprocity
Safety
Sense of community
Workforce
title Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A41%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commensality,%20ritual,%20and%20reciprocity:%20Cattle%20feedyard%20managers'%20perspectives%20on%20safety%20culture&rft.jtitle=Anthropological%20notebooks&rft.au=Klataske,%20Ryan%20T&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.pages=86-&rft.issn=1408-032X&rft.eissn=2232-3716&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.10417679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2912034385%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2912034385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true