Loading…
Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture
This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strate...
Saved in:
Published in: | Anthropological notebooks 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 86 |
container_title | Anthropological notebooks |
container_volume | 29 |
creator | Klataske, Ryan T Ramos, Athena K |
description | This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them. |
doi_str_mv | 10.5281/zenodo.10417679 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2912034385</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2912034385</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotjs1LxDAUxIMouK6evQY8eNmuSV7atN6krB-w4EXBW3ltXqRLv0xSYf3rLehl5jDDzI-xaym2qcrl3Q8Nox23UmhpMlOcsJVSoBIwMjtlK6lFnghQH-fsIoSDEGlhQK1YVY59T0PAro3HDfdtnLHbcBws99S0kx-bJbjnJcbYEXdE9oje8h4H_CQfbvm06ERNbL8p8HHgAR3FI2_mLs6eLtmZwy7Q1b-v2fvj7q18TvavTy_lwz6ZZA4xWWgUoHEAqcNaCyCpVWGtEw4FAmaOwOnUGp2ajOpa6aLJl1ZjM3SZs7BmN3-7C_HXTCFWh3H2w3JZqUIqARryFH4BDaBZAQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2912034385</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text</source><creator>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</creator><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><description>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1408-032X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2232-3716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.10417679</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Ljublijana: Slovene Anthropological Society</publisher><subject>Cattle ; Cultural differences ; Ethnographic research ; Health initiatives ; Kinship ; Reciprocity ; Safety ; Sense of community ; Workforce</subject><ispartof>Anthropological notebooks, 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86</ispartof><rights>Copyright Slovene Anthropological Society 2023</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><title>Anthropological notebooks</title><description>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</description><subject>Cattle</subject><subject>Cultural differences</subject><subject>Ethnographic research</subject><subject>Health initiatives</subject><subject>Kinship</subject><subject>Reciprocity</subject><subject>Safety</subject><subject>Sense of community</subject><subject>Workforce</subject><issn>1408-032X</issn><issn>2232-3716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNotjs1LxDAUxIMouK6evQY8eNmuSV7atN6krB-w4EXBW3ltXqRLv0xSYf3rLehl5jDDzI-xaym2qcrl3Q8Nox23UmhpMlOcsJVSoBIwMjtlK6lFnghQH-fsIoSDEGlhQK1YVY59T0PAro3HDfdtnLHbcBws99S0kx-bJbjnJcbYEXdE9oje8h4H_CQfbvm06ERNbL8p8HHgAR3FI2_mLs6eLtmZwy7Q1b-v2fvj7q18TvavTy_lwz6ZZA4xWWgUoHEAqcNaCyCpVWGtEw4FAmaOwOnUGp2ajOpa6aLJl1ZjM3SZs7BmN3-7C_HXTCFWh3H2w3JZqUIqARryFH4BDaBZAQ</recordid><startdate>20230101</startdate><enddate>20230101</enddate><creator>Klataske, Ryan T</creator><creator>Ramos, Athena K</creator><general>Slovene Anthropological Society</general><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20230101</creationdate><title>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</title><author>Klataske, Ryan T ; Ramos, Athena K</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cattle</topic><topic>Cultural differences</topic><topic>Ethnographic research</topic><topic>Health initiatives</topic><topic>Kinship</topic><topic>Reciprocity</topic><topic>Safety</topic><topic>Sense of community</topic><topic>Workforce</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Klataske, Ryan T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ramos, Athena K</creatorcontrib><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Anthropological notebooks</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Klataske, Ryan T</au><au>Ramos, Athena K</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture</atitle><jtitle>Anthropological notebooks</jtitle><date>2023-01-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>29</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>86</spage><pages>86-</pages><issn>1408-032X</issn><eissn>2232-3716</eissn><abstract>This article focuses on how cattle feedyard managers think about the idea of "safety culture" and why it might matter for the well-being of feedyard operations and their workforce. Drawing on interviews and ethnographic research in the Great Plains of the United States, it describes strategies used by managers to cultivate a sense of community, belonging, and kinship among employees, which some managers believed to be key features of feedyard cultures that foster safety. The findings suggest that efforts to improve the safety and health of cattle feedyard workers may benefit from considering how safety initiatives are shaped by the social and cultural dimensions of feedyards, the structural context of these animal feeding operations, and the everyday lives, experiences, and interactions of people who work on them.</abstract><cop>Ljublijana</cop><pub>Slovene Anthropological Society</pub><doi>10.5281/zenodo.10417679</doi></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1408-032X |
ispartof | Anthropological notebooks, 2023-01, Vol.29 (2), p.86 |
issn | 1408-032X 2232-3716 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2912034385 |
source | International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); EBSCOhost MLA International Bibliography With Full Text |
subjects | Cattle Cultural differences Ethnographic research Health initiatives Kinship Reciprocity Safety Sense of community Workforce |
title | Commensality, ritual, and reciprocity: Cattle feedyard managers' perspectives on safety culture |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T08%3A41%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Commensality,%20ritual,%20and%20reciprocity:%20Cattle%20feedyard%20managers'%20perspectives%20on%20safety%20culture&rft.jtitle=Anthropological%20notebooks&rft.au=Klataske,%20Ryan%20T&rft.date=2023-01-01&rft.volume=29&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=86&rft.pages=86-&rft.issn=1408-032X&rft.eissn=2232-3716&rft_id=info:doi/10.5281/zenodo.10417679&rft_dat=%3Cproquest%3E2912034385%3C/proquest%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p183t-59723a7f335fab403e1429ddf0fa0a3a6fe3f45d74576ebb249c803ecd6af6fd3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2912034385&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |