Loading…

Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles

This research aims to assess the clogging process of geotextiles within silt fences. For that purpose, the filtering efficiency, flow rate, and clogging of three geotextiles (GTX-1, GTX-2, and GTX-3) employing two distinct soils and under three sediment discharge cycles were investigated. The analys...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Water (Basel) 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.107
Main Authors: Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes, Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores, Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti, Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo, Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira, Félix, Emerson Felipe
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 107
container_title Water (Basel)
container_volume 16
creator Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes
Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores
Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti
Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo
Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira
Félix, Emerson Felipe
description This research aims to assess the clogging process of geotextiles within silt fences. For that purpose, the filtering efficiency, flow rate, and clogging of three geotextiles (GTX-1, GTX-2, and GTX-3) employing two distinct soils and under three sediment discharge cycles were investigated. The analysis adhered to the American standard D5141-11 and, as further analyses, qualitative and quantitative inspections were conducted through microscopic images of the materials. The results showed greater clogging of the nonwoven geotextile, GTX-1, with higher retention efficiency (approximately 100%) and better turbidity removal for both soils, equal to a reduction of around 94%. For GTX-2, a woven geotextile with a larger pore opening, less intense clogging and lower retention efficiency were observed after the third discharge; the average was 96% for both soils. GTX-3, a woven geotextile with a smaller apparent opening, exhibited a behavior similar to GTX-1: as the number of cycles increased, the material experienced more clogging and higher retention efficiency for soil 1 (approximately 98.5%). Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the discharge cycles impact the tested geotextiles in diverse ways and, therefore, the selection of the material should be contingent on project requirements.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/w16010107
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2912771749</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A779351950</galeid><sourcerecordid>A779351950</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkc1u1DAQxyNUJKrSA29giQs9bInjOI65taEtSCuBVDhbs_Y49SqxW9sB9tanqNTX40lwtRVCzBxmpP9vRvNRVW9ofcqYrN__pF1Ni4sX1WFTC7Zq25Ye_JO_qo5T2tbFWtn3vD6sHq7RuBl9JucQo8OYft8_kq8YbYgzeI3EeZJvkKxhEyLkEHcfyMUPmBbILngSLBmmMI7OjwS8IZduynEvDTcQQWeMLmWn01OjKwwZf2U3YSLXy2aLRTYkB_LRJV3wEcmw00V9Xb20MCU8fo5H1ffLi2_Dp9X6y9Xn4Wy90qxr88pi13TGIGyslj0zVnALHULbWWmoZYANpXyDvNcaaQ-ioR1YkIY1wHvG2VH1bt_3Noa7BVNWc5kEpwk8hiUpRjmjXSMFK-jb_9BtWKIv06lG0kYIKlpZqNM9NcKEynkbyjl0cYOz08GjLcurMyEk41TyuhSc7At0DClFtOo2uhniTtFaPX1V_f0q-wM895eA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2912771749</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes ; Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores ; Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti ; Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo ; Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira ; Félix, Emerson Felipe</creator><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes ; Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores ; Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti ; Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo ; Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira ; Félix, Emerson Felipe</creatorcontrib><description>This research aims to assess the clogging process of geotextiles within silt fences. For that purpose, the filtering efficiency, flow rate, and clogging of three geotextiles (GTX-1, GTX-2, and GTX-3) employing two distinct soils and under three sediment discharge cycles were investigated. The analysis adhered to the American standard D5141-11 and, as further analyses, qualitative and quantitative inspections were conducted through microscopic images of the materials. The results showed greater clogging of the nonwoven geotextile, GTX-1, with higher retention efficiency (approximately 100%) and better turbidity removal for both soils, equal to a reduction of around 94%. For GTX-2, a woven geotextile with a larger pore opening, less intense clogging and lower retention efficiency were observed after the third discharge; the average was 96% for both soils. GTX-3, a woven geotextile with a smaller apparent opening, exhibited a behavior similar to GTX-1: as the number of cycles increased, the material experienced more clogging and higher retention efficiency for soil 1 (approximately 98.5%). Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the discharge cycles impact the tested geotextiles in diverse ways and, therefore, the selection of the material should be contingent on project requirements.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2073-4441</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/w16010107</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Design ; Efficiency ; Fences ; filtration ; geotextiles ; Highway construction ; Laboratories ; Particle size ; Permeability ; Retention ; sediment yield ; Sedimentation &amp; deposition ; Sediments ; Silt ; soil ; Soil erosion ; turbidity ; water</subject><ispartof>Water (Basel), 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.107</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9419-6838 ; 0000-0002-8928-9474 ; 0000-0002-3676-637X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2912771749/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2912771749?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25751,27922,27923,37010,37011,44588,74896</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Félix, Emerson Felipe</creatorcontrib><title>Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles</title><title>Water (Basel)</title><description>This research aims to assess the clogging process of geotextiles within silt fences. For that purpose, the filtering efficiency, flow rate, and clogging of three geotextiles (GTX-1, GTX-2, and GTX-3) employing two distinct soils and under three sediment discharge cycles were investigated. The analysis adhered to the American standard D5141-11 and, as further analyses, qualitative and quantitative inspections were conducted through microscopic images of the materials. The results showed greater clogging of the nonwoven geotextile, GTX-1, with higher retention efficiency (approximately 100%) and better turbidity removal for both soils, equal to a reduction of around 94%. For GTX-2, a woven geotextile with a larger pore opening, less intense clogging and lower retention efficiency were observed after the third discharge; the average was 96% for both soils. GTX-3, a woven geotextile with a smaller apparent opening, exhibited a behavior similar to GTX-1: as the number of cycles increased, the material experienced more clogging and higher retention efficiency for soil 1 (approximately 98.5%). Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the discharge cycles impact the tested geotextiles in diverse ways and, therefore, the selection of the material should be contingent on project requirements.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Design</subject><subject>Efficiency</subject><subject>Fences</subject><subject>filtration</subject><subject>geotextiles</subject><subject>Highway construction</subject><subject>Laboratories</subject><subject>Particle size</subject><subject>Permeability</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>sediment yield</subject><subject>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</subject><subject>Sediments</subject><subject>Silt</subject><subject>soil</subject><subject>Soil erosion</subject><subject>turbidity</subject><subject>water</subject><issn>2073-4441</issn><issn>2073-4441</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkc1u1DAQxyNUJKrSA29giQs9bInjOI65taEtSCuBVDhbs_Y49SqxW9sB9tanqNTX40lwtRVCzBxmpP9vRvNRVW9ofcqYrN__pF1Ni4sX1WFTC7Zq25Ye_JO_qo5T2tbFWtn3vD6sHq7RuBl9JucQo8OYft8_kq8YbYgzeI3EeZJvkKxhEyLkEHcfyMUPmBbILngSLBmmMI7OjwS8IZduynEvDTcQQWeMLmWn01OjKwwZf2U3YSLXy2aLRTYkB_LRJV3wEcmw00V9Xb20MCU8fo5H1ffLi2_Dp9X6y9Xn4Wy90qxr88pi13TGIGyslj0zVnALHULbWWmoZYANpXyDvNcaaQ-ioR1YkIY1wHvG2VH1bt_3Noa7BVNWc5kEpwk8hiUpRjmjXSMFK-jb_9BtWKIv06lG0kYIKlpZqNM9NcKEynkbyjl0cYOz08GjLcurMyEk41TyuhSc7At0DClFtOo2uhniTtFaPX1V_f0q-wM895eA</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes</creator><creator>Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores</creator><creator>Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti</creator><creator>Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo</creator><creator>Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira</creator><creator>Félix, Emerson Felipe</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>7S9</scope><scope>L.6</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-6838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-9474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-637X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles</title><author>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes ; Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores ; Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti ; Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo ; Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira ; Félix, Emerson Felipe</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Design</topic><topic>Efficiency</topic><topic>Fences</topic><topic>filtration</topic><topic>geotextiles</topic><topic>Highway construction</topic><topic>Laboratories</topic><topic>Particle size</topic><topic>Permeability</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>sediment yield</topic><topic>Sedimentation &amp; deposition</topic><topic>Sediments</topic><topic>Silt</topic><topic>soil</topic><topic>Soil erosion</topic><topic>turbidity</topic><topic>water</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Félix, Emerson Felipe</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>AGRICOLA</collection><collection>AGRICOLA - Academic</collection><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Adachi, Vitor Yudi Góes</au><au>Rodríguez, Joan Steven Flores</au><au>Motta, Mariana Ferreira Benessiuti</au><au>Pedroso, Gabriel Orquizas Mattielo</au><au>Hein, Luis Rogerio de Oliveira</au><au>Félix, Emerson Felipe</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles</atitle><jtitle>Water (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>107</spage><pages>107-</pages><issn>2073-4441</issn><eissn>2073-4441</eissn><abstract>This research aims to assess the clogging process of geotextiles within silt fences. For that purpose, the filtering efficiency, flow rate, and clogging of three geotextiles (GTX-1, GTX-2, and GTX-3) employing two distinct soils and under three sediment discharge cycles were investigated. The analysis adhered to the American standard D5141-11 and, as further analyses, qualitative and quantitative inspections were conducted through microscopic images of the materials. The results showed greater clogging of the nonwoven geotextile, GTX-1, with higher retention efficiency (approximately 100%) and better turbidity removal for both soils, equal to a reduction of around 94%. For GTX-2, a woven geotextile with a larger pore opening, less intense clogging and lower retention efficiency were observed after the third discharge; the average was 96% for both soils. GTX-3, a woven geotextile with a smaller apparent opening, exhibited a behavior similar to GTX-1: as the number of cycles increased, the material experienced more clogging and higher retention efficiency for soil 1 (approximately 98.5%). Based on these findings, it can be inferred that the discharge cycles impact the tested geotextiles in diverse ways and, therefore, the selection of the material should be contingent on project requirements.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/w16010107</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9419-6838</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8928-9474</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3676-637X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2073-4441
ispartof Water (Basel), 2024-01, Vol.16 (1), p.107
issn 2073-4441
2073-4441
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2912771749
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Analysis
Design
Efficiency
Fences
filtration
geotextiles
Highway construction
Laboratories
Particle size
Permeability
Retention
sediment yield
Sedimentation & deposition
Sediments
Silt
soil
Soil erosion
turbidity
water
title Sediment Barriers’ Performance in the Laboratory: Evaluation of Clogging and Filtration Characteristics in Geotextiles Subjected to Discharge Cycles
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T14%3A37%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Sediment%20Barriers%E2%80%99%20Performance%20in%20the%20Laboratory:%20Evaluation%20of%20Clogging%20and%20Filtration%20Characteristics%20in%20Geotextiles%20Subjected%20to%20Discharge%20Cycles&rft.jtitle=Water%20(Basel)&rft.au=Adachi,%20Vitor%20Yudi%20G%C3%B3es&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=107&rft.pages=107-&rft.issn=2073-4441&rft.eissn=2073-4441&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/w16010107&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA779351950%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c364t-fe626ddeabfc983df75fa6ea46f9d1f3ae2115be58cce18a7216afa9d32a58353%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2912771749&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A779351950&rfr_iscdi=true