Optical constants and dispersion energy parameters of heterostructured Ga2O3/GaN films

• Published in: Optical and quantum electronics 2024-03, Vol.56 (3), Article 402
• Main Authors: Jubu, Peverga R., Bem, Terngu Timothy, Ndeze Ndeze, Urenyang, Akeredolu, Bunmi Jacob, Bakr, Mohammed, Danladi, Eli, Adedokun, Oluwaseun, Aldayyat, Abdallah, Eweh, Eweh Junior, Yam, Fong Kwong
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Characterization and Evaluation of Materials; Chemical vapor deposition; Computer Communication Networks; Crystal dislocations; Crystallites; Dielectric strength; Dislocation density; Dispersion; Electrical Engineering; Film thickness; Gallium nitrides; Gallium oxides; Heterojunctions; Lasers; Material properties; Optical Devices; Optics; Optoelectronics; Oscillators; Parameters; Photonics; Physics; Physics and Astronomy; Refractivity; Stacking faults; Structural analysis; Temperature
• ISSN: 0306-8919; 1572-817X
• DOI: 10.1007/s11082-023-06080-1

The demand for heterojunction materials is on the increase due to the great achievements of modern nanotechnology that has stimulated the enormous research interest for investigating their material properties. Heterostructured Ga 2 O 3 /GaN have been widely deployed for electronic and optoelectronic applications, but its several optical parameters have rarely been exploited. The present work attempts to report some of the optical parameters of Ga 2 O 3 /GaN films prepared at different temperatures by the chemical vapour deposition method. Morphological characterization revealed increased film thickness with increased temperature. Structural analysis revealed the coexistence of β-Ga 2 O 3 and GaN phases. The change in temperature induced crystallite size growth, reduction in dislocation density and stacking faults. UV–vis measurements showed two distinct bandgaps belonging to the β-Ga 2 O 3 and GaN crystal phases, with a systematic broadening 4.61–4.79 eV for β-Ga 2 O 3 and 3.41–3.45 eV for GaN as the temperature was increased. The absorption and extinction coefficients were in the orders of 10 3 and 10 −1 , respectively. The refractive index ranged between 1.55 and 1.86, while the static refractive index ranged between 1.45 and 1.98. The porosity of the films decreased with increased temperature and film thickness. Also discussed in detail were the dielectric constants, the optical dispersion energy using Wemple-DiDomenico model, oscillator strength, oscillator energy, and the non-linear optical susceptibility of the films.