Loading…
Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems
In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This a...
Saved in:
Published in: | Soft computing (Berlin, Germany) Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3 |
container_end_page | 15697 |
container_issue | 21 |
container_start_page | 15675 |
container_title | Soft computing (Berlin, Germany) |
container_volume | 27 |
creator | Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam Khorram, Esmaile Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid |
description | In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2917922654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917922654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfwFXAdfQkc0mzlOINCgrqOmQySU2ZmdQkrehK8BF8Q5_EtKO4c3XCyff_B74sOyZwSgDYWQAoATDQHMNkAhzTnWxEijzHrGB8d_ummFVFvp8dhLAAoISV-Sj7eHhxqHONNVY36E4G5Vodo_16_7zXXhrbW9Tp-OSagIzzKLh2bfs56lZttK5eaBXtWiO3jLazbzLterT0rm51F5DsmwFctlbJLZj-5l523abjlzvM9oxsgz76mePs8fLiYXqNZ7dXN9PzGVaUQcTaaM15wTkxFVS0VJJpVhkioTRNUxI-KWoNktZKKiNVJRWwoiwpT2Yqakw-zk6G3nT4eaVDFAu38n06KSgnjFNalUWi6EAp70Lw2oilt530r4KA2MgWg2yRZIutbEFTKB9CIcH9XPu_6n9S31YZh7E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917922654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-7643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computational Intelligence ; Continuity (mathematics) ; Control ; Convex analysis ; Engineering ; Linear programming ; Mathematical Logic and Foundations ; Mechatronics ; Methods ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Pareto optimum ; Programming ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorram, Esmaile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><title>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</title><addtitle>Soft Comput</addtitle><description>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Continuity (mathematics)</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Convex analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>1432-7643</issn><issn>1433-7479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfwFXAdfQkc0mzlOINCgrqOmQySU2ZmdQkrehK8BF8Q5_EtKO4c3XCyff_B74sOyZwSgDYWQAoATDQHMNkAhzTnWxEijzHrGB8d_ummFVFvp8dhLAAoISV-Sj7eHhxqHONNVY36E4G5Vodo_16_7zXXhrbW9Tp-OSagIzzKLh2bfs56lZttK5eaBXtWiO3jLazbzLterT0rm51F5DsmwFctlbJLZj-5l523abjlzvM9oxsgz76mePs8fLiYXqNZ7dXN9PzGVaUQcTaaM15wTkxFVS0VJJpVhkioTRNUxI-KWoNktZKKiNVJRWwoiwpT2Yqakw-zk6G3nT4eaVDFAu38n06KSgnjFNalUWi6EAp70Lw2oilt530r4KA2MgWg2yRZIutbEFTKB9CIcH9XPu_6n9S31YZh7E</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creator><creator>Khorram, Esmaile</creator><creator>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><author>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Continuity (mathematics)</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Convex analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorram, Esmaile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies & Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</au><au>Khorram, Esmaile</au><au>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</atitle><jtitle>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle><stitle>Soft Comput</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>15675</spage><epage>15697</epage><pages>15675-15697</pages><issn>1432-7643</issn><eissn>1433-7479</eissn><abstract>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1432-7643 |
ispartof | Soft computing (Berlin, Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697 |
issn | 1432-7643 1433-7479 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2917922654 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Algorithms Approximation Artificial Intelligence Computational Intelligence Continuity (mathematics) Control Convex analysis Engineering Linear programming Mathematical Logic and Foundations Mechatronics Methods Multiple objective analysis Optimization Pareto optimization Pareto optimum Programming Robotics |
title | Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A39%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20modified%20Pascoletti%E2%80%93Serafini%20methods%20for%20solving%20multiobjective%20optimization%20problems%20and%20multiplicative%20programming%20problems&rft.jtitle=Soft%20computing%20(Berlin,%20Germany)&rft.au=Dolatnezhadsomarin,%20Azam&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=15675&rft.epage=15697&rft.pages=15675-15697&rft.issn=1432-7643&rft.eissn=1433-7479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2917922654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917922654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |