Loading…

Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems

In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This a...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Soft computing (Berlin, Germany) Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697
Main Authors: Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam, Khorram, Esmaile, Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3
container_end_page 15697
container_issue 21
container_start_page 15675
container_title Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)
container_volume 27
creator Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam
Khorram, Esmaile
Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid
description In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2917922654</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2917922654</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfwFXAdfQkc0mzlOINCgrqOmQySU2ZmdQkrehK8BF8Q5_EtKO4c3XCyff_B74sOyZwSgDYWQAoATDQHMNkAhzTnWxEijzHrGB8d_ummFVFvp8dhLAAoISV-Sj7eHhxqHONNVY36E4G5Vodo_16_7zXXhrbW9Tp-OSagIzzKLh2bfs56lZttK5eaBXtWiO3jLazbzLterT0rm51F5DsmwFctlbJLZj-5l523abjlzvM9oxsgz76mePs8fLiYXqNZ7dXN9PzGVaUQcTaaM15wTkxFVS0VJJpVhkioTRNUxI-KWoNktZKKiNVJRWwoiwpT2Yqakw-zk6G3nT4eaVDFAu38n06KSgnjFNalUWi6EAp70Lw2oilt530r4KA2MgWg2yRZIutbEFTKB9CIcH9XPu_6n9S31YZh7E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2917922654</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creator><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><description>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-7643</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1433-7479</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Approximation ; Artificial Intelligence ; Computational Intelligence ; Continuity (mathematics) ; Control ; Convex analysis ; Engineering ; Linear programming ; Mathematical Logic and Foundations ; Mechatronics ; Methods ; Multiple objective analysis ; Optimization ; Pareto optimization ; Pareto optimum ; Programming ; Robotics</subject><ispartof>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27905,27906</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorram, Esmaile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><title>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</title><addtitle>Soft Comput</addtitle><description>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Approximation</subject><subject>Artificial Intelligence</subject><subject>Computational Intelligence</subject><subject>Continuity (mathematics)</subject><subject>Control</subject><subject>Convex analysis</subject><subject>Engineering</subject><subject>Linear programming</subject><subject>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</subject><subject>Mechatronics</subject><subject>Methods</subject><subject>Multiple objective analysis</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimization</subject><subject>Pareto optimum</subject><subject>Programming</subject><subject>Robotics</subject><issn>1432-7643</issn><issn>1433-7479</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMtKAzEUhgdRsFZfwFXAdfQkc0mzlOINCgrqOmQySU2ZmdQkrehK8BF8Q5_EtKO4c3XCyff_B74sOyZwSgDYWQAoATDQHMNkAhzTnWxEijzHrGB8d_ummFVFvp8dhLAAoISV-Sj7eHhxqHONNVY36E4G5Vodo_16_7zXXhrbW9Tp-OSagIzzKLh2bfs56lZttK5eaBXtWiO3jLazbzLterT0rm51F5DsmwFctlbJLZj-5l523abjlzvM9oxsgz76mePs8fLiYXqNZ7dXN9PzGVaUQcTaaM15wTkxFVS0VJJpVhkioTRNUxI-KWoNktZKKiNVJRWwoiwpT2Yqakw-zk6G3nT4eaVDFAu38n06KSgnjFNalUWi6EAp70Lw2oilt530r4KA2MgWg2yRZIutbEFTKB9CIcH9XPu_6n9S31YZh7E</recordid><startdate>20231101</startdate><enddate>20231101</enddate><creator>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creator><creator>Khorram, Esmaile</creator><creator>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>ARAPS</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>K7-</scope><scope>P5Z</scope><scope>P62</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20231101</creationdate><title>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</title><author>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam ; Khorram, Esmaile ; Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Approximation</topic><topic>Artificial Intelligence</topic><topic>Computational Intelligence</topic><topic>Continuity (mathematics)</topic><topic>Control</topic><topic>Convex analysis</topic><topic>Engineering</topic><topic>Linear programming</topic><topic>Mathematical Logic and Foundations</topic><topic>Mechatronics</topic><topic>Methods</topic><topic>Multiple objective analysis</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimization</topic><topic>Pareto optimum</topic><topic>Programming</topic><topic>Robotics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Khorram, Esmaile</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database‎ (1962 - current)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Computer science database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Advanced Technologies &amp; Aerospace Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dolatnezhadsomarin, Azam</au><au>Khorram, Esmaile</au><au>Yousefikhoshbakht, Majid</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems</atitle><jtitle>Soft computing (Berlin, Germany)</jtitle><stitle>Soft Comput</stitle><date>2023-11-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>21</issue><spage>15675</spage><epage>15697</epage><pages>15675-15697</pages><issn>1432-7643</issn><eissn>1433-7479</eissn><abstract>In this paper, a modified Pascoletti–Serafini scalarization approach, called MOP_MPS, is proposed to generate approximations of a Pareto front of bounded multi-objective optimization problems (MOPs). The objective is obtaining some points with an almost even distribution overall Pareto front. This algorithm is applied to six test problems with convex, non-convex, connected, and dis-connected Pareto fronts, and its results are compared with results of some famous algorithms. The results emphasize that MOP_MPS is effective and competitive in comparing with the other considered algorithms. In addition, it is shown that an optimal solution of a multiplicative programming problem is a properly Pareto optimal solution of an MOP. By considering this relation between MOPs and multiplicative programming problems (MPPs), another algorithm based on MOP_MPS, called MPP_MPS, is suggested for approximately solving non-linear MPPs in which functions multiplied are continuous and bounded from below. The computational results on seven problems of convex MPPs demonstrate that the algorithm is much better than a cut and bound algorithm presented by Shao and Ehrgott in terms of CPU time.</abstract><cop>Berlin/Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2</doi><tpages>23</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1965-1594</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-7643
ispartof Soft computing (Berlin, Germany), 2023-11, Vol.27 (21), p.15675-15697
issn 1432-7643
1433-7479
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2917922654
source Springer Link
subjects Algorithms
Approximation
Artificial Intelligence
Computational Intelligence
Continuity (mathematics)
Control
Convex analysis
Engineering
Linear programming
Mathematical Logic and Foundations
Mechatronics
Methods
Multiple objective analysis
Optimization
Pareto optimization
Pareto optimum
Programming
Robotics
title Two modified Pascoletti–Serafini methods for solving multiobjective optimization problems and multiplicative programming problems
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T20%3A39%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Two%20modified%20Pascoletti%E2%80%93Serafini%20methods%20for%20solving%20multiobjective%20optimization%20problems%20and%20multiplicative%20programming%20problems&rft.jtitle=Soft%20computing%20(Berlin,%20Germany)&rft.au=Dolatnezhadsomarin,%20Azam&rft.date=2023-11-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=21&rft.spage=15675&rft.epage=15697&rft.pages=15675-15697&rft.issn=1432-7643&rft.eissn=1433-7479&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s00500-023-08809-2&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2917922654%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c270t-efee994991f60625ca7e76f1a05fdd51984be0a2bcacfac6ac074552950062ff3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2917922654&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true