Probabilistic comparison and assessment of proficiency testing schemes and laboratories in the somatic cell count of raw milk

• Published in: Accreditation and quality assurance 2016-06, Vol.21 (3), p.175-183
• Main Authors: Berger, Thomas F. H., Luginbühl, Werner
• Format: Article
• Language: English
• Subjects: Analytical Chemistry; Automation; Biochemistry; Calibration; Chemistry; Chemistry and Materials Science; Commercial Law; Dairy products; Ecotoxicology; Estimates; Food Science; General Paper; Indicators; Legislation; Mammary glands; Marketing; Milk; Optoelectronics; Probability; Quality assessment; Random variables; Reference materials; Reference systems; Reproducibility; Standard deviation; Statistical analysis; Testing laboratories
• ISSN: 0949-1775; 1432-0517
• DOI: 10.1007/s00769-016-1207-y

The somatic cell count (SCC) of milk is one of the main indicators of the udder health status of lactating mammals and is a hygiene criterion of raw milk used to manufacture dairy products. An increase in SCC is regarded as one of the primary indicators of inflammation of the mammary gland. Therefore, SCC is relevant in food legislation as well as in the payment of ex-farm raw milk and it has a major impact on farm management and breeding programs. Its determination is one of the most frequently performed analytical tests worldwide. Routine measurements of SCC are almost exclusively done using automated fluoro-opto-electronic counting. However, certified reference materials for SCC are lacking, and the microscopic reference method is not reliable because of serious inherent weaknesses. A reference system approach may help to largely overcome these deficiencies and help to assure equivalence in SCC worldwide. The approach is characterised as a positioning system fed by different types of information from various sources. A statistical approach for comparing proficiency tests (PTs) by assessing them using a quality index P Q and assessing participating laboratories using a quality index P L , both deriving from probabilities, is proposed. The basic assumption is that PT schemes are conducted according to recognised guidelines in order to compute performance characteristics, such as z -scores, repeatability and reproducibility standard deviations. Standard deviations are compared with the method validation data from the ISO method. Input quantities close to or smaller than the reference data of the method validation or the assigned value of the PT result in values for P Q and P L close to the maximum value. Evaluation examples of well-known PTs show the practicability of the proposed approach.