Loading…
University students' conceptions of learning across multiple domains
Research on students' conceptions of learning is a growing and complex area of interest in the field of psychology of education. Even though much of the investigation addressed to explore conceptions of learning at the university level, still less research has considered how naïve (i.e. 'l...
Saved in:
Published in: | European journal of psychology of education 2018-10, Vol.33 (4), p.665-684 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Research on students' conceptions of learning is a growing and complex area of interest in the field of psychology of education. Even though much of the investigation addressed to explore conceptions of learning at the university level, still less research has considered how naïve (i.e. 'learning as reduction of deficit knowledge through individual effort') and sophisticated (i.e. 'learning as opportunity and self-efficacy') conceptions of learning are related to personal and contextual factors. This research investigated how gender, academic area, and level of study influence university students' conceptions of learning. Three hundred forty-six university students participated in the study. They were either from humanities (240) or technical-scientific (106) areas of study and they were attending either a Bachelor (140) or Master's degree (206) course. Conceptions of learning were explored using a self-report instrument (Learning Conceptions Questionnaire; LCQ). A MANOVA revealed that females show conceptions of learning more related to social and motivational aspects of learning with a greater personal involvement, compared with males. No typical pattern of conceptions of learning was found for humanities students or for technical-scientific students. Increasing with the level of study, students showed both naïve and sophisticated conceptions of learning increased, since both 'learning as reduction of deficit knowledge through individual effort' and 'learning as opportunities and self-efficacy' were more likely. Implications of these results and future lines of research will be discussed. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 0256-2928 1878-5174 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s10212-017-0349-6 |