Loading…

Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression

Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However, the relative importance of the number of NE species (species richness), versus the particular combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression and ultimately...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands) Netherlands), 2018-08, Vol.63 (4), p.575-584
Main Authors: Alhadidi, Sanaa N., Griffin, John N., Fowler, Mike S.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73
container_end_page 584
container_issue 4
container_start_page 575
container_title BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)
container_volume 63
creator Alhadidi, Sanaa N.
Griffin, John N.
Fowler, Mike S.
description Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However, the relative importance of the number of NE species (species richness), versus the particular combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression and ultimately crop yields, remains poorly understood. We tested the effects of NE richness and composition on pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and broad bean plants Vicia faba (Linn.). We used the larvae of two predator species, the ladybird Adalia bipunctata (Linn.) and the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Stephens), and the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi (Haliday) as enemies. NEs generally reduced aphid density but did not increase final plant biomass, despite a significant negative correlation between aphid density and plant biomass. Among NE treatments, species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. The composition of NEs within richness levels also affected final aphid density: the ladybird was a key species among the treatments in controlling aphid density and was especially effective in combination with the parasitoid. This ladybird/parasitoid combination also appeared to drive the higher level of suppression observed at the two, relative to three, species richness levels. Although these three species of aphid NEs are commonly used in aphid control, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that simultaneously examined these three species and highlighted the composition effect between the A. bipunctata and A. ervi . In conclusion, increasing NE species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. Meanwhile, the presence of a key species (the ladybird) and its combination with a parasitoid was an important determinant of aphid biological control.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s10526-018-9870-z
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918264168</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918264168</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhYnRxPHxA9yRuEa50AJdmonPTHSja0IpOJ1MHwJdzPx6mdTEla44Cec79-QgdAX0BiiVtxFoyQShoEilJCX7I7SAUnKiWKGOs-ZKEAEFnKKzGDc0M2WpFujl1aQpmC12vet22A7dOMQ2tUOPg0lrF3Bam6xbu-5djLhxyYWuzRqPLiYcp3EM-SMDF-jEm210lz_vOfp4uH9fPpHV2-Pz8m5FLFcyES9cUVNa59rCKppLNqqqa2O8qAGcsBaASa-8Up6LpuC1BFtZWoKFxjrJz9H1nDuG4WvKJfRmmEKfT2pWgWKiAKH-dVHKWcm5OGTB7LJhiDE4r8fQdibsNFB9GFbPw-o8rD4Mq_eZYTMTs7f_dOE3-W_oG350fDM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2003253367</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Alhadidi, Sanaa N. ; Griffin, John N. ; Fowler, Mike S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Alhadidi, Sanaa N. ; Griffin, John N. ; Fowler, Mike S.</creatorcontrib><description>Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However, the relative importance of the number of NE species (species richness), versus the particular combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression and ultimately crop yields, remains poorly understood. We tested the effects of NE richness and composition on pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and broad bean plants Vicia faba (Linn.). We used the larvae of two predator species, the ladybird Adalia bipunctata (Linn.) and the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Stephens), and the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi (Haliday) as enemies. NEs generally reduced aphid density but did not increase final plant biomass, despite a significant negative correlation between aphid density and plant biomass. Among NE treatments, species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. The composition of NEs within richness levels also affected final aphid density: the ladybird was a key species among the treatments in controlling aphid density and was especially effective in combination with the parasitoid. This ladybird/parasitoid combination also appeared to drive the higher level of suppression observed at the two, relative to three, species richness levels. Although these three species of aphid NEs are commonly used in aphid control, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that simultaneously examined these three species and highlighted the composition effect between the A. bipunctata and A. ervi . In conclusion, increasing NE species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. Meanwhile, the presence of a key species (the ladybird) and its combination with a parasitoid was an important determinant of aphid biological control.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1386-6141</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-8248</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10526-018-9870-z</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Acyrthosiphon pisum ; Adalia bipunctata ; Agriculture ; Animal Biochemistry ; Animal Ecology ; Aphidius ervi ; Aquatic insects ; Behavioral Sciences ; Biodiversity ; Biological control ; Biomass ; Biomedical and Life Sciences ; Broad beans ; Chrysoperla carnea ; Composition effects ; Crop yield ; Entomology ; Experiments ; Greenhouses ; Herbivores ; Insects ; Larvae ; Life Sciences ; Natural enemies ; Parasitoids ; Pest control ; Pests ; Plant biomass ; Plant Pathology ; Planting density ; Predation ; Roles ; Species composition ; Species richness ; Vicia faba</subject><ispartof>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2018-08, Vol.63 (4), p.575-584</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2018</rights><rights>BioControl is a copyright of Springer, (2018). All Rights Reserved.</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2018. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Alhadidi, Sanaa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Mike S.</creatorcontrib><title>Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression</title><title>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</title><addtitle>BioControl</addtitle><description>Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However, the relative importance of the number of NE species (species richness), versus the particular combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression and ultimately crop yields, remains poorly understood. We tested the effects of NE richness and composition on pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and broad bean plants Vicia faba (Linn.). We used the larvae of two predator species, the ladybird Adalia bipunctata (Linn.) and the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Stephens), and the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi (Haliday) as enemies. NEs generally reduced aphid density but did not increase final plant biomass, despite a significant negative correlation between aphid density and plant biomass. Among NE treatments, species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. The composition of NEs within richness levels also affected final aphid density: the ladybird was a key species among the treatments in controlling aphid density and was especially effective in combination with the parasitoid. This ladybird/parasitoid combination also appeared to drive the higher level of suppression observed at the two, relative to three, species richness levels. Although these three species of aphid NEs are commonly used in aphid control, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that simultaneously examined these three species and highlighted the composition effect between the A. bipunctata and A. ervi . In conclusion, increasing NE species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. Meanwhile, the presence of a key species (the ladybird) and its combination with a parasitoid was an important determinant of aphid biological control.</description><subject>Acyrthosiphon pisum</subject><subject>Adalia bipunctata</subject><subject>Agriculture</subject><subject>Animal Biochemistry</subject><subject>Animal Ecology</subject><subject>Aphidius ervi</subject><subject>Aquatic insects</subject><subject>Behavioral Sciences</subject><subject>Biodiversity</subject><subject>Biological control</subject><subject>Biomass</subject><subject>Biomedical and Life Sciences</subject><subject>Broad beans</subject><subject>Chrysoperla carnea</subject><subject>Composition effects</subject><subject>Crop yield</subject><subject>Entomology</subject><subject>Experiments</subject><subject>Greenhouses</subject><subject>Herbivores</subject><subject>Insects</subject><subject>Larvae</subject><subject>Life Sciences</subject><subject>Natural enemies</subject><subject>Parasitoids</subject><subject>Pest control</subject><subject>Pests</subject><subject>Plant biomass</subject><subject>Plant Pathology</subject><subject>Planting density</subject><subject>Predation</subject><subject>Roles</subject><subject>Species composition</subject><subject>Species richness</subject><subject>Vicia faba</subject><issn>1386-6141</issn><issn>1573-8248</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPxCAUhYnRxPHxA9yRuEa50AJdmonPTHSja0IpOJ1MHwJdzPx6mdTEla44Cec79-QgdAX0BiiVtxFoyQShoEilJCX7I7SAUnKiWKGOs-ZKEAEFnKKzGDc0M2WpFujl1aQpmC12vet22A7dOMQ2tUOPg0lrF3Bam6xbu-5djLhxyYWuzRqPLiYcp3EM-SMDF-jEm210lz_vOfp4uH9fPpHV2-Pz8m5FLFcyES9cUVNa59rCKppLNqqqa2O8qAGcsBaASa-8Up6LpuC1BFtZWoKFxjrJz9H1nDuG4WvKJfRmmEKfT2pWgWKiAKH-dVHKWcm5OGTB7LJhiDE4r8fQdibsNFB9GFbPw-o8rD4Mq_eZYTMTs7f_dOE3-W_oG350fDM</recordid><startdate>20180801</startdate><enddate>20180801</enddate><creator>Alhadidi, Sanaa N.</creator><creator>Griffin, John N.</creator><creator>Fowler, Mike S.</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QG</scope><scope>7QL</scope><scope>7SN</scope><scope>7SS</scope><scope>7T7</scope><scope>7U9</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FH</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BBNVY</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BHPHI</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>H94</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>LK8</scope><scope>M7N</scope><scope>M7P</scope><scope>P64</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20180801</creationdate><title>Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression</title><author>Alhadidi, Sanaa N. ; Griffin, John N. ; Fowler, Mike S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>Acyrthosiphon pisum</topic><topic>Adalia bipunctata</topic><topic>Agriculture</topic><topic>Animal Biochemistry</topic><topic>Animal Ecology</topic><topic>Aphidius ervi</topic><topic>Aquatic insects</topic><topic>Behavioral Sciences</topic><topic>Biodiversity</topic><topic>Biological control</topic><topic>Biomass</topic><topic>Biomedical and Life Sciences</topic><topic>Broad beans</topic><topic>Chrysoperla carnea</topic><topic>Composition effects</topic><topic>Crop yield</topic><topic>Entomology</topic><topic>Experiments</topic><topic>Greenhouses</topic><topic>Herbivores</topic><topic>Insects</topic><topic>Larvae</topic><topic>Life Sciences</topic><topic>Natural enemies</topic><topic>Parasitoids</topic><topic>Pest control</topic><topic>Pests</topic><topic>Plant biomass</topic><topic>Plant Pathology</topic><topic>Planting density</topic><topic>Predation</topic><topic>Roles</topic><topic>Species composition</topic><topic>Species richness</topic><topic>Vicia faba</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Alhadidi, Sanaa N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Griffin, John N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fowler, Mike S.</creatorcontrib><collection>SpringerOpen</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Animal Behavior Abstracts</collection><collection>Bacteriology Abstracts (Microbiology B)</collection><collection>Ecology Abstracts</collection><collection>Entomology Abstracts (Full archive)</collection><collection>Industrial and Applied Microbiology Abstracts (Microbiology A)</collection><collection>Virology and AIDS Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Natural Science Collection</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>AIDS and Cancer Research Abstracts</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Biological Science Collection</collection><collection>Algology Mycology and Protozoology Abstracts (Microbiology C)</collection><collection>Biological Science Database</collection><collection>Biotechnology and BioEngineering Abstracts</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Alhadidi, Sanaa N.</au><au>Griffin, John N.</au><au>Fowler, Mike S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression</atitle><jtitle>BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands)</jtitle><stitle>BioControl</stitle><date>2018-08-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>63</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>575</spage><epage>584</epage><pages>575-584</pages><issn>1386-6141</issn><eissn>1573-8248</eissn><abstract>Natural enemy (NE) biodiversity is thought to play an important role in agricultural pest suppression. However, the relative importance of the number of NE species (species richness), versus the particular combinations of species (species composition), in determining aphid suppression and ultimately crop yields, remains poorly understood. We tested the effects of NE richness and composition on pea aphids Acyrthosiphon pisum (Harris) and broad bean plants Vicia faba (Linn.). We used the larvae of two predator species, the ladybird Adalia bipunctata (Linn.) and the green lacewing Chrysopa carnea (Stephens), and the parasitic wasp Aphidius ervi (Haliday) as enemies. NEs generally reduced aphid density but did not increase final plant biomass, despite a significant negative correlation between aphid density and plant biomass. Among NE treatments, species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. The composition of NEs within richness levels also affected final aphid density: the ladybird was a key species among the treatments in controlling aphid density and was especially effective in combination with the parasitoid. This ladybird/parasitoid combination also appeared to drive the higher level of suppression observed at the two, relative to three, species richness levels. Although these three species of aphid NEs are commonly used in aphid control, this is the first study, to our knowledge, that simultaneously examined these three species and highlighted the composition effect between the A. bipunctata and A. ervi . In conclusion, increasing NE species richness had an inconsistent effect on aphid density. Meanwhile, the presence of a key species (the ladybird) and its combination with a parasitoid was an important determinant of aphid biological control.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10526-018-9870-z</doi><tpages>10</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1386-6141
ispartof BioControl (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2018-08, Vol.63 (4), p.575-584
issn 1386-6141
1573-8248
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918264168
source Springer Nature
subjects Acyrthosiphon pisum
Adalia bipunctata
Agriculture
Animal Biochemistry
Animal Ecology
Aphidius ervi
Aquatic insects
Behavioral Sciences
Biodiversity
Biological control
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Broad beans
Chrysoperla carnea
Composition effects
Crop yield
Entomology
Experiments
Greenhouses
Herbivores
Insects
Larvae
Life Sciences
Natural enemies
Parasitoids
Pest control
Pests
Plant biomass
Plant Pathology
Planting density
Predation
Roles
Species composition
Species richness
Vicia faba
title Natural enemy composition rather than richness determines pest suppression
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T16%3A25%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Natural%20enemy%20composition%20rather%20than%20richness%20determines%20pest%20suppression&rft.jtitle=BioControl%20(Dordrecht,%20Netherlands)&rft.au=Alhadidi,%20Sanaa%20N.&rft.date=2018-08-01&rft.volume=63&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=575&rft.epage=584&rft.pages=575-584&rft.issn=1386-6141&rft.eissn=1573-8248&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10526-018-9870-z&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918264168%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c387t-f6e4b00b1006c80157d89bbaaf6b11e6cc1127f8f88f36d43b71c9c051c1dce73%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2003253367&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true