Loading…
Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation
Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the mo...
Saved in:
Published in: | Group dynamics 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | 324 |
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 309 |
container_title | Group dynamics |
container_volume | 28 |
creator | Gao, Ruoyu Peng, Chao Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) Wan, Zeying |
description | Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams.
Highlights and Implications
*
Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams.
*
Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy.
*
Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation.
*
Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1037/gdn0000214 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918277241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918277241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcvfoKAb0o1Sbu28W3Mf4OJw83nkLY3XUaX1CQd7Cv4qc02wfty74Uf53BOFF0TfE9wkj80tcZhKElPogFhCY7zAtPTcOOCxTRj7Dy6cG6NMUkTRgbRz9ztqpVpTaMq0aKFkOB3aNKqjfCAhK7RAloZvwstGqUbtASxQVOtzVZ4ZTSaW1OBc49ouQL0aVpARqKJ0c7bvvJqC_vHW7MF63YHvXHvV8aq4PKkpAQL2quD1mV0JkXr4OpvD6Ovl-fl5C2efbxOJ-NZLOgo9bHAGICQEAsEjOosl7QsKbA0wyWrszqXoixJDRVmuMioLIis01QyCcBoSfNkGN0cdTtrvntwnq9Nb3Ww5JSRguY5TUmgbo9UZY1zFiTvbCjF7jjBfN81_-86wHdHWHSCd6FRYb2qWnBVb_cB9yynBU95glnyC5NwhEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918277241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying</creator><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying ; Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams.
Highlights and Implications
*
Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams.
*
Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy.
*
Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation.
*
Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7802</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Authority ; Cooperative Learning ; Female ; Human ; Innovation ; Male ; Psychological Safety ; Role Perception ; Self-Managing Work Teams</subject><ispartof>Group dynamics, 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A</contributor><contributor>Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Zeying</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><title>Group dynamics</title><description>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams.
Highlights and Implications
*
Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams.
*
Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy.
*
Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation.
*
Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</description><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological Safety</subject><subject>Role Perception</subject><subject>Self-Managing Work Teams</subject><issn>1089-2699</issn><issn>1930-7802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcvfoKAb0o1Sbu28W3Mf4OJw83nkLY3XUaX1CQd7Cv4qc02wfty74Uf53BOFF0TfE9wkj80tcZhKElPogFhCY7zAtPTcOOCxTRj7Dy6cG6NMUkTRgbRz9ztqpVpTaMq0aKFkOB3aNKqjfCAhK7RAloZvwstGqUbtASxQVOtzVZ4ZTSaW1OBc49ouQL0aVpARqKJ0c7bvvJqC_vHW7MF63YHvXHvV8aq4PKkpAQL2quD1mV0JkXr4OpvD6Ovl-fl5C2efbxOJ-NZLOgo9bHAGICQEAsEjOosl7QsKbA0wyWrszqXoixJDRVmuMioLIis01QyCcBoSfNkGN0cdTtrvntwnq9Nb3Ww5JSRguY5TUmgbo9UZY1zFiTvbCjF7jjBfN81_-86wHdHWHSCd6FRYb2qWnBVb_cB9yynBU95glnyC5NwhEw</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Gao, Ruoyu</creator><creator>Peng, Chao</creator><creator>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creator><creator>Wan, Zeying</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><author>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological Safety</topic><topic>Role Perception</topic><topic>Self-Managing Work Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Zeying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Ruoyu</au><au>Peng, Chao</au><au>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</au><au>Wan, Zeying</au><au>Tasca, Giorgio A</au><au>Bonner, Bryan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</atitle><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>309-324</pages><issn>1089-2699</issn><eissn>1930-7802</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams.
Highlights and Implications
*
Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams.
*
Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy.
*
Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation.
*
Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/gdn0000214</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1089-2699 |
ispartof | Group dynamics, 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324 |
issn | 1089-2699 1930-7802 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2918277241 |
source | EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES |
subjects | Authority Cooperative Learning Female Human Innovation Male Psychological Safety Role Perception Self-Managing Work Teams |
title | Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20Safety%20Climate%20and%20Self-Managing%20Team%20Innovation%20Process:%20The%20Role%20of%20Constructive%20Controversy%20and%20Authority%20Differentiation&rft.jtitle=Group%20dynamics&rft.au=Gao,%20Ruoyu&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=309-324&rft.issn=1089-2699&rft.eissn=1930-7802&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/gdn0000214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918277241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918277241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |