Loading…

Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation

Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the mo...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Group dynamics 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324
Main Authors: Gao, Ruoyu, Peng, Chao, Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank), Wan, Zeying
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page 324
container_issue 4
container_start_page 309
container_title Group dynamics
container_volume 28
creator Gao, Ruoyu
Peng, Chao
Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)
Wan, Zeying
description Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams. Highlights and Implications * Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams. * Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy. * Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation. * Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.
doi_str_mv 10.1037/gdn0000214
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918277241</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918277241</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcvfoKAb0o1Sbu28W3Mf4OJw83nkLY3XUaX1CQd7Cv4qc02wfty74Uf53BOFF0TfE9wkj80tcZhKElPogFhCY7zAtPTcOOCxTRj7Dy6cG6NMUkTRgbRz9ztqpVpTaMq0aKFkOB3aNKqjfCAhK7RAloZvwstGqUbtASxQVOtzVZ4ZTSaW1OBc49ouQL0aVpARqKJ0c7bvvJqC_vHW7MF63YHvXHvV8aq4PKkpAQL2quD1mV0JkXr4OpvD6Ovl-fl5C2efbxOJ-NZLOgo9bHAGICQEAsEjOosl7QsKbA0wyWrszqXoixJDRVmuMioLIis01QyCcBoSfNkGN0cdTtrvntwnq9Nb3Ww5JSRguY5TUmgbo9UZY1zFiTvbCjF7jjBfN81_-86wHdHWHSCd6FRYb2qWnBVb_cB9yynBU95glnyC5NwhEw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918277241</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><source>EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES</source><creator>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying</creator><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying ; Tasca, Giorgio A ; Bonner, Bryan L</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams. Highlights and Implications * Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams. * Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy. * Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation. * Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1089-2699</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1930-7802</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1037/gdn0000214</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Educational Publishing Foundation</publisher><subject>Authority ; Cooperative Learning ; Female ; Human ; Innovation ; Male ; Psychological Safety ; Role Perception ; Self-Managing Work Teams</subject><ispartof>Group dynamics, 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324</ispartof><rights>2024 American Psychological Association</rights><rights>2024, American Psychological Association</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><contributor>Tasca, Giorgio A</contributor><contributor>Bonner, Bryan L</contributor><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Zeying</creatorcontrib><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><title>Group dynamics</title><description>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams. Highlights and Implications * Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams. * Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy. * Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation. * Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</description><subject>Authority</subject><subject>Cooperative Learning</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Human</subject><subject>Innovation</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Psychological Safety</subject><subject>Role Perception</subject><subject>Self-Managing Work Teams</subject><issn>1089-2699</issn><issn>1930-7802</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkF9LwzAUxYsoOKcvfoKAb0o1Sbu28W3Mf4OJw83nkLY3XUaX1CQd7Cv4qc02wfty74Uf53BOFF0TfE9wkj80tcZhKElPogFhCY7zAtPTcOOCxTRj7Dy6cG6NMUkTRgbRz9ztqpVpTaMq0aKFkOB3aNKqjfCAhK7RAloZvwstGqUbtASxQVOtzVZ4ZTSaW1OBc49ouQL0aVpARqKJ0c7bvvJqC_vHW7MF63YHvXHvV8aq4PKkpAQL2quD1mV0JkXr4OpvD6Ovl-fl5C2efbxOJ-NZLOgo9bHAGICQEAsEjOosl7QsKbA0wyWrszqXoixJDRVmuMioLIis01QyCcBoSfNkGN0cdTtrvntwnq9Nb3Ww5JSRguY5TUmgbo9UZY1zFiTvbCjF7jjBfN81_-86wHdHWHSCd6FRYb2qWnBVb_cB9yynBU95glnyC5NwhEw</recordid><startdate>20241201</startdate><enddate>20241201</enddate><creator>Gao, Ruoyu</creator><creator>Peng, Chao</creator><creator>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creator><creator>Wan, Zeying</creator><general>Educational Publishing Foundation</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7RZ</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241201</creationdate><title>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</title><author>Gao, Ruoyu ; Peng, Chao ; Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank) ; Wan, Zeying</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Authority</topic><topic>Cooperative Learning</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Human</topic><topic>Innovation</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Psychological Safety</topic><topic>Role Perception</topic><topic>Self-Managing Work Teams</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Gao, Ruoyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Chao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wan, Zeying</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>APA PsycArticles®</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Gao, Ruoyu</au><au>Peng, Chao</au><au>Wang, Xiao-Hua (Frank)</au><au>Wan, Zeying</au><au>Tasca, Giorgio A</au><au>Bonner, Bryan L</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation</atitle><jtitle>Group dynamics</jtitle><date>2024-12-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>28</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>309</spage><epage>324</epage><pages>309-324</pages><issn>1089-2699</issn><eissn>1930-7802</eissn><abstract>Objective: This study aims to reveal the innovation process of self-managing teams. We investigate the relationship between perceived team psychological safety climate and team innovation in self-managing teams, with a focus on the mediating role of perceived team constructive controversy and the moderating role of perceived authority differentiation. Method: To test our model, we collected cross-sectional survey data from 41 indie bands in China and asked band members to reflect upon their general collaboration experiences with their teammates. Results: Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy, which interacts with authority differentiation to influence team innovation, such that team constructive controversy is positively related to team innovation only when authority differentiation is high. Conclusions: This study extends our understanding of the innovation process of self-managing teams. Highlights and Implications * Using 41 real-world indie bands as a sample, this article explores the innovation process within self-managing teams. * Team psychological safety climate is positively related to team constructive controversy. * Authority differentiation is an important boundary condition which moderates the relationship between constructive controversy and team innovation. * Both constructive controversy and authority differentiation are relevant to the internal innovation process of self-managing teams. Self-managing teams should implement intervention measures to promote psychological safety climate and encourage the emergence of informal leadership to achieve team innovation.</abstract><pub>Educational Publishing Foundation</pub><doi>10.1037/gdn0000214</doi><tpages>16</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8444-9478</orcidid></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1089-2699
ispartof Group dynamics, 2024-12, Vol.28 (4), p.309-324
issn 1089-2699
1930-7802
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918277241
source EBSCOhost APA PsycARTICLES
subjects Authority
Cooperative Learning
Female
Human
Innovation
Male
Psychological Safety
Role Perception
Self-Managing Work Teams
title Psychological Safety Climate and Self-Managing Team Innovation Process: The Role of Constructive Controversy and Authority Differentiation
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T14%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Psychological%20Safety%20Climate%20and%20Self-Managing%20Team%20Innovation%20Process:%20The%20Role%20of%20Constructive%20Controversy%20and%20Authority%20Differentiation&rft.jtitle=Group%20dynamics&rft.au=Gao,%20Ruoyu&rft.date=2024-12-01&rft.volume=28&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=309&rft.epage=324&rft.pages=309-324&rft.issn=1089-2699&rft.eissn=1930-7802&rft_id=info:doi/10.1037/gdn0000214&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918277241%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a254t-a00ee11802eae5d67f2bb2e9460b9d6d7fabb1dec090862f81fd44f9fee92b273%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918277241&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true