Loading…

Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield

Polyimide material is widely used in the aerospace field, but its secondary electron emission yield is high. In this study, a graphene coating was used to suppress its secondary electron emission, and the secondary electron emission yield of graphene-coated materials with different thicknesses was c...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Coatings (Basel) 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.13
Main Authors: Qi, Xin, Ma, Yanzhao, Liu, Sisheng, Nie, Xiangyu, Zhang, Tao, Wu, Yong, Peng, Weiping, Hu, Guoming
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3
container_end_page
container_issue 1
container_start_page 13
container_title Coatings (Basel)
container_volume 14
creator Qi, Xin
Ma, Yanzhao
Liu, Sisheng
Nie, Xiangyu
Zhang, Tao
Wu, Yong
Peng, Weiping
Hu, Guoming
description Polyimide material is widely used in the aerospace field, but its secondary electron emission yield is high. In this study, a graphene coating was used to suppress its secondary electron emission, and the secondary electron emission yield of graphene-coated materials with different thicknesses was calculated using the GEANT4 numerical simulation method. The suppression effect of different thicknesses of graphene coatings on the secondary electron emission was analyzed. The simulation results showed that the optimal graphene coating thicknesses for the lowest secondary electron yield of polyimide materials were 1 nm and 5 nm, which reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 13% in terms of simulation. The 5 nm graphene coating reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 6% compared to the polyimide material from an experimental perspective. The 5 nm coating showed better results at higher energies and was experimentally verified by preparing five layers of graphene coating, which showed good agreement between the simulation and experiment. Meanwhile, with the increase in graphene coating thickness, the surface secondary electron emission displacement range decreased, and the secondary electrons produced at the surface were of low energy. The results of this study can provide technical reference for polyimide in aerospace applications and secondary electron emission simulation.
doi_str_mv 10.3390/coatings14010013
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918540507</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A780873534</galeid><sourcerecordid>A780873534</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdUcFKAzEQXUTBUnv3GPDcmmySzeZYatVCRaH14GlJs5M2dXezJinYvzelHsSZwwxv5r3hMVl2S_CEUonvtVPRdttAGCYYE3qRDXIs5LhgJL_8019noxD2OIUktCRykH2_uBqaJpFR3AFatL3SETmDnrzqd9ABmp21T9iDNQY8dBGtd1Z_dhACBOQ69Oaao21tDWh12IToVYQTfFJcgXZdrfwRzRvQ0Sf4w0JT32RXRjUBRr91mL0_ztez5_Hy9Wkxmy7HmvI8jpVkZmMU50oYJgUvcF6ajQZmVF5wKVlZlNIoo5gwaQRFmgqKRUFMyQsKdJjdnXV7774OEGK1dwffpZNVLknJGeZYpK3JeWurGqhsZ1wyoVPW0NpkAIxN-FSUuBSUU5YI-EzQ3oXgwVS9t22yWRFcnX5S_f8J_QGBaYGA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918540507</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield</title><source>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</source><creator>Qi, Xin ; Ma, Yanzhao ; Liu, Sisheng ; Nie, Xiangyu ; Zhang, Tao ; Wu, Yong ; Peng, Weiping ; Hu, Guoming</creator><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xin ; Ma, Yanzhao ; Liu, Sisheng ; Nie, Xiangyu ; Zhang, Tao ; Wu, Yong ; Peng, Weiping ; Hu, Guoming</creatorcontrib><description>Polyimide material is widely used in the aerospace field, but its secondary electron emission yield is high. In this study, a graphene coating was used to suppress its secondary electron emission, and the secondary electron emission yield of graphene-coated materials with different thicknesses was calculated using the GEANT4 numerical simulation method. The suppression effect of different thicknesses of graphene coatings on the secondary electron emission was analyzed. The simulation results showed that the optimal graphene coating thicknesses for the lowest secondary electron yield of polyimide materials were 1 nm and 5 nm, which reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 13% in terms of simulation. The 5 nm graphene coating reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 6% compared to the polyimide material from an experimental perspective. The 5 nm coating showed better results at higher energies and was experimentally verified by preparing five layers of graphene coating, which showed good agreement between the simulation and experiment. Meanwhile, with the increase in graphene coating thickness, the surface secondary electron emission displacement range decreased, and the secondary electrons produced at the surface were of low energy. The results of this study can provide technical reference for polyimide in aerospace applications and secondary electron emission simulation.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2079-6412</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2079-6412</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/coatings14010013</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Analysis ; Coatings ; Electric waves ; Electromagnetic radiation ; Electromagnetic waves ; Electron emission ; Electrons ; Emission analysis ; Energy ; Graphene ; Graphite ; Mathematical models ; Monte Carlo simulation ; Numerical analysis ; Physics ; Simulation ; Simulation methods ; Substrates ; Thickness ; Thin films</subject><ispartof>Coatings (Basel), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.13</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2023 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2023 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-3742-5138</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918540507/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2918540507?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,25753,27924,27925,37012,44590,75126</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yanzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Xiangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guoming</creatorcontrib><title>Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield</title><title>Coatings (Basel)</title><description>Polyimide material is widely used in the aerospace field, but its secondary electron emission yield is high. In this study, a graphene coating was used to suppress its secondary electron emission, and the secondary electron emission yield of graphene-coated materials with different thicknesses was calculated using the GEANT4 numerical simulation method. The suppression effect of different thicknesses of graphene coatings on the secondary electron emission was analyzed. The simulation results showed that the optimal graphene coating thicknesses for the lowest secondary electron yield of polyimide materials were 1 nm and 5 nm, which reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 13% in terms of simulation. The 5 nm graphene coating reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 6% compared to the polyimide material from an experimental perspective. The 5 nm coating showed better results at higher energies and was experimentally verified by preparing five layers of graphene coating, which showed good agreement between the simulation and experiment. Meanwhile, with the increase in graphene coating thickness, the surface secondary electron emission displacement range decreased, and the secondary electrons produced at the surface were of low energy. The results of this study can provide technical reference for polyimide in aerospace applications and secondary electron emission simulation.</description><subject>Analysis</subject><subject>Coatings</subject><subject>Electric waves</subject><subject>Electromagnetic radiation</subject><subject>Electromagnetic waves</subject><subject>Electron emission</subject><subject>Electrons</subject><subject>Emission analysis</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Graphene</subject><subject>Graphite</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Monte Carlo simulation</subject><subject>Numerical analysis</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Simulation</subject><subject>Simulation methods</subject><subject>Substrates</subject><subject>Thickness</subject><subject>Thin films</subject><issn>2079-6412</issn><issn>2079-6412</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpdUcFKAzEQXUTBUnv3GPDcmmySzeZYatVCRaH14GlJs5M2dXezJinYvzelHsSZwwxv5r3hMVl2S_CEUonvtVPRdttAGCYYE3qRDXIs5LhgJL_8019noxD2OIUktCRykH2_uBqaJpFR3AFatL3SETmDnrzqd9ABmp21T9iDNQY8dBGtd1Z_dhACBOQ69Oaao21tDWh12IToVYQTfFJcgXZdrfwRzRvQ0Sf4w0JT32RXRjUBRr91mL0_ztez5_Hy9Wkxmy7HmvI8jpVkZmMU50oYJgUvcF6ajQZmVF5wKVlZlNIoo5gwaQRFmgqKRUFMyQsKdJjdnXV7774OEGK1dwffpZNVLknJGeZYpK3JeWurGqhsZ1wyoVPW0NpkAIxN-FSUuBSUU5YI-EzQ3oXgwVS9t22yWRFcnX5S_f8J_QGBaYGA</recordid><startdate>20240101</startdate><enddate>20240101</enddate><creator>Qi, Xin</creator><creator>Ma, Yanzhao</creator><creator>Liu, Sisheng</creator><creator>Nie, Xiangyu</creator><creator>Zhang, Tao</creator><creator>Wu, Yong</creator><creator>Peng, Weiping</creator><creator>Hu, Guoming</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SR</scope><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>8FE</scope><scope>8FG</scope><scope>ABJCF</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BGLVJ</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>D1I</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>HCIFZ</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>KB.</scope><scope>PDBOC</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3742-5138</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240101</creationdate><title>Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield</title><author>Qi, Xin ; Ma, Yanzhao ; Liu, Sisheng ; Nie, Xiangyu ; Zhang, Tao ; Wu, Yong ; Peng, Weiping ; Hu, Guoming</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Analysis</topic><topic>Coatings</topic><topic>Electric waves</topic><topic>Electromagnetic radiation</topic><topic>Electromagnetic waves</topic><topic>Electron emission</topic><topic>Electrons</topic><topic>Emission analysis</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Graphene</topic><topic>Graphite</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Monte Carlo simulation</topic><topic>Numerical analysis</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Simulation</topic><topic>Simulation methods</topic><topic>Substrates</topic><topic>Thickness</topic><topic>Thin films</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Qi, Xin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ma, Yanzhao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Liu, Sisheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nie, Xiangyu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhang, Tao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wu, Yong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Peng, Weiping</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hu, Guoming</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Engineered Materials Abstracts</collection><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest SciTech Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Technology Collection</collection><collection>Materials Science &amp; Engineering Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Technology Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>SciTech Premium Collection</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Database</collection><collection>Materials Science Collection</collection><collection>Access via ProQuest (Open Access)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Coatings (Basel)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Qi, Xin</au><au>Ma, Yanzhao</au><au>Liu, Sisheng</au><au>Nie, Xiangyu</au><au>Zhang, Tao</au><au>Wu, Yong</au><au>Peng, Weiping</au><au>Hu, Guoming</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield</atitle><jtitle>Coatings (Basel)</jtitle><date>2024-01-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>14</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><pages>13-</pages><issn>2079-6412</issn><eissn>2079-6412</eissn><abstract>Polyimide material is widely used in the aerospace field, but its secondary electron emission yield is high. In this study, a graphene coating was used to suppress its secondary electron emission, and the secondary electron emission yield of graphene-coated materials with different thicknesses was calculated using the GEANT4 numerical simulation method. The suppression effect of different thicknesses of graphene coatings on the secondary electron emission was analyzed. The simulation results showed that the optimal graphene coating thicknesses for the lowest secondary electron yield of polyimide materials were 1 nm and 5 nm, which reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 13% in terms of simulation. The 5 nm graphene coating reduced the secondary electron emission yield by 6% compared to the polyimide material from an experimental perspective. The 5 nm coating showed better results at higher energies and was experimentally verified by preparing five layers of graphene coating, which showed good agreement between the simulation and experiment. Meanwhile, with the increase in graphene coating thickness, the surface secondary electron emission displacement range decreased, and the secondary electrons produced at the surface were of low energy. The results of this study can provide technical reference for polyimide in aerospace applications and secondary electron emission simulation.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/coatings14010013</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3742-5138</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 2079-6412
ispartof Coatings (Basel), 2024-01, Vol.14 (1), p.13
issn 2079-6412
2079-6412
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918540507
source Access via ProQuest (Open Access)
subjects Analysis
Coatings
Electric waves
Electromagnetic radiation
Electromagnetic waves
Electron emission
Electrons
Emission analysis
Energy
Graphene
Graphite
Mathematical models
Monte Carlo simulation
Numerical analysis
Physics
Simulation
Simulation methods
Substrates
Thickness
Thin films
title Modelling the Impact of Graphene Coating of Different Thicknesses on Polyimide Substrate on the Secondary Electron Yield
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T22%3A08%3A49IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Modelling%20the%20Impact%20of%20Graphene%20Coating%20of%20Different%20Thicknesses%20on%20Polyimide%20Substrate%20on%20the%20Secondary%20Electron%20Yield&rft.jtitle=Coatings%20(Basel)&rft.au=Qi,%20Xin&rft.date=2024-01-01&rft.volume=14&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.pages=13-&rft.issn=2079-6412&rft.eissn=2079-6412&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/coatings14010013&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA780873534%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c352t-a94fbfa55a7f49756028fbce4fa2659948689fafa47f028e68fb730761f8563e3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918540507&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A780873534&rfr_iscdi=true