Loading…
Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports
Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall...
Saved in:
Published in: | Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.192-197 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Background
For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming.
Objective
The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively.
Materials and methods
The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning.
Results
The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot.
Conclusion
Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy. |
---|---|
ISSN: | 1432-9123 1439-054X |
DOI: | 10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4 |