Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports

Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.192-197
Main Authors: Kempe, Simon, Krome, Anna-Julia, Köpp, Werner, Wittmann, Lutz
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Cardiology
Content analysis
Dreams
Emotions
Internal Medicine
Likert scale
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurology
Original Studies
Otorhinolaryngology
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Psychoanalysis
Psychology
Regulation
Social interaction
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3
container_end_page 197
container_issue 3
container_start_page 192
container_title Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine
container_volume 27
creator Kempe, Simon
Krome, Anna-Julia
Köpp, Werner
Wittmann, Lutz
description Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning. Results The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot. Conclusion Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2918751783</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2918751783</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4hxYPxLH3FB5SpW4gMTNcvyo0qZ2sZND-fWkLYIbp13NzoxWH0KXBK4JgLjJhNSkLoCyAoATUfAjNCGcyQJK_nG832khCWWn6CznJQCUUNMJUvet9y650OOV22Y8hC6aFba_qo0x5Vusg-62X21YYBNDvzvoYLEeXabHyS2GTvdtDLgN2Can16O2ianP5-jE6y67i585Re-PD2-z52L--vQyu5sXhlWsL7wFSkRjtPU1k1Q0WliQHog0kpWNEZUtPW-4ZFRa1pCqamwtOCHQUC-NYVN0dejdpPg5uNyrZRzS-HRWVJJalETUbHTRg8ukmHNyXm1Su9ZpqwioHUh1AKlGkGoPUvExxA6hPJrDwqW_6n9S3wL3d0Y</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2918751783</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports</title><source>Springer Nature</source><creator>Kempe, Simon ; Krome, Anna-Julia ; Köpp, Werner ; Wittmann, Lutz</creator><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Simon ; Krome, Anna-Julia ; Köpp, Werner ; Wittmann, Lutz</creatorcontrib><description>Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning. Results The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot. Conclusion Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1432-9123</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1439-054X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Heidelberg: Springer Medizin</publisher><subject>Cardiology ; Content analysis ; Dreams ; Emotions ; Internal Medicine ; Likert scale ; Medicine ; Medicine &amp; Public Health ; Neurology ; Original Studies ; Otorhinolaryngology ; Pneumology/Respiratory System ; Psychoanalysis ; Psychology ; Regulation ; Social interaction</subject><ispartof>Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.192-197</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2023</rights><rights>The Author(s) 2023. This work is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3</cites><orcidid>0009-0005-8792-2634</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krome, Anna-Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köpp, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Lutz</creatorcontrib><title>Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports</title><title>Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine</title><addtitle>Somnologie</addtitle><description>Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning. Results The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot. Conclusion Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy.</description><subject>Cardiology</subject><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Dreams</subject><subject>Emotions</subject><subject>Internal Medicine</subject><subject>Likert scale</subject><subject>Medicine</subject><subject>Medicine &amp; Public Health</subject><subject>Neurology</subject><subject>Original Studies</subject><subject>Otorhinolaryngology</subject><subject>Pneumology/Respiratory System</subject><subject>Psychoanalysis</subject><subject>Psychology</subject><subject>Regulation</subject><subject>Social interaction</subject><issn>1432-9123</issn><issn>1439-054X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2023</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kEtPwzAQhC0EEqXwBzhZ4hxYPxLH3FB5SpW4gMTNcvyo0qZ2sZND-fWkLYIbp13NzoxWH0KXBK4JgLjJhNSkLoCyAoATUfAjNCGcyQJK_nG832khCWWn6CznJQCUUNMJUvet9y650OOV22Y8hC6aFba_qo0x5Vusg-62X21YYBNDvzvoYLEeXabHyS2GTvdtDLgN2Can16O2ianP5-jE6y67i585Re-PD2-z52L--vQyu5sXhlWsL7wFSkRjtPU1k1Q0WliQHog0kpWNEZUtPW-4ZFRa1pCqamwtOCHQUC-NYVN0dejdpPg5uNyrZRzS-HRWVJJalETUbHTRg8ukmHNyXm1Su9ZpqwioHUh1AKlGkGoPUvExxA6hPJrDwqW_6n9S3wL3d0Y</recordid><startdate>20230901</startdate><enddate>20230901</enddate><creator>Kempe, Simon</creator><creator>Krome, Anna-Julia</creator><creator>Köpp, Werner</creator><creator>Wittmann, Lutz</creator><general>Springer Medizin</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>C6C</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8792-2634</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20230901</creationdate><title>Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports</title><author>Kempe, Simon ; Krome, Anna-Julia ; Köpp, Werner ; Wittmann, Lutz</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2023</creationdate><topic>Cardiology</topic><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Dreams</topic><topic>Emotions</topic><topic>Internal Medicine</topic><topic>Likert scale</topic><topic>Medicine</topic><topic>Medicine &amp; Public Health</topic><topic>Neurology</topic><topic>Original Studies</topic><topic>Otorhinolaryngology</topic><topic>Pneumology/Respiratory System</topic><topic>Psychoanalysis</topic><topic>Psychology</topic><topic>Regulation</topic><topic>Social interaction</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kempe, Simon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krome, Anna-Julia</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Köpp, Werner</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wittmann, Lutz</creatorcontrib><collection>Springer Nature OA Free Journals</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>PHMC-Proquest健康医学期刊库</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><jtitle>Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kempe, Simon</au><au>Krome, Anna-Julia</au><au>Köpp, Werner</au><au>Wittmann, Lutz</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports</atitle><jtitle>Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine</jtitle><stitle>Somnologie</stitle><date>2023-09-01</date><risdate>2023</risdate><volume>27</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>192</spage><epage>197</epage><pages>192-197</pages><issn>1432-9123</issn><eissn>1439-054X</eissn><abstract>Background For empirical dream research, numerous scales and rating systems exist for different facets of dreaming. Objective The present study aimed to compare two different approaches for dream report analysis focusing on content and affect regulation, respectively. Materials and methods The Hall and Van de Castle Coding System (HVCCS), complemented by two global rating scales, as well as the Zurich Dream Process Coding System (ZDPCS) were applied to one dream of a patient with impairments in personality functioning. Results The comparison of both approaches reveals clear differences with respect to theoretical presuppositions, coding material, evaluation categories, norm data, time course of dream content, and economic as well as sample size considerations. For instance, while the HVCCS is distinguished by its economic applicability, the ZDPCS allows for a detailed reconstruction of the dynamic development of the dream plot. Conclusion Only precise knowledge of the specific characteristics of different approaches to dream content allows researchers to adequately define their analytic strategy.</abstract><cop>Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Medizin</pub><doi>10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4</doi><tpages>6</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0005-8792-2634</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1432-9123
ispartof Somnologie : Schlafforschung und Schlafmedizin = Somnology : sleep research and sleep medicine, 2023-09, Vol.27 (3), p.192-197
issn 1432-9123
1439-054X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2918751783
source Springer Nature
subjects Cardiology
Content analysis
Dreams
Emotions
Internal Medicine
Likert scale
Medicine
Medicine & Public Health
Neurology
Original Studies
Otorhinolaryngology
Pneumology/Respiratory System
Psychoanalysis
Psychology
Regulation
Social interaction
title Different keys unlock different doors: analyzing content and affect regulation in dream reports
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T03%3A10%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Different%20keys%20unlock%20different%20doors:%20analyzing%20content%20and%20affect%20regulation%20in%20dream%20reports&rft.jtitle=Somnologie%20:%20Schlafforschung%20und%20Schlafmedizin%20=%20Somnology%20:%20sleep%20research%20and%20sleep%20medicine&rft.au=Kempe,%20Simon&rft.date=2023-09-01&rft.volume=27&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=192&rft.epage=197&rft.pages=192-197&rft.issn=1432-9123&rft.eissn=1439-054X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s11818-023-00417-4&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2918751783%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c363t-fd0217bcadf83927ba7d09f019c935bc76d5f4b49329d3b166bd874110b2f9cc3%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2918751783&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true