Assessment of Two Methods for Sampling Invertebrates in Shallow Vegetated Wetlands

Invertebrates are often used as indicators of wetland health and habitat quality for species such as waterbirds. However, the sampling method may influence the characterization of wetland invertebrate populations. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two sampling methods,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Wetlands (Wilmington, N.C.) N.C.), 2013-12, Vol.33 (6), p.1063-1073
Main Authors: Meyer, Micah D., Davis, Craig A., Bidwell, Joseph R.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Aquatic birds
Biomass
Biomedical and Life Sciences
Birds
Coastal Sciences
Community structure
Density
Ecology
Environmental Management
Environmental quality
Estimates
Ethanol
Floods
Freshwater & Marine Ecology
Hydrogeology
Invertebrates
Landscape Ecology
Life Sciences
Loam soils
Methods
Precipitation
Sampling
Sampling methods
Taxa
Vegetation
Waterfowl
Wetlands
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Invertebrates are often used as indicators of wetland health and habitat quality for species such as waterbirds. However, the sampling method may influence the characterization of wetland invertebrate populations. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of two sampling methods, the aquatic D-frame net and Quadrat-Column-Core (QCC) method, in determining invertebrate population metrics in vegetated depressional wetlands of north central Oklahoma. As compared to the D-frame net, use of the QCC method resulted in higher estimates of both total microcrustacean and nonmicrocrustacean density and biomass. Additionally, the QCC method had higher estimates of density and biomass for seven of the eight functional feeding groups and nearly half of the 49 taxa collected from the wetlands. The D-frame net method produced higher estimates of taxa richness and the Shannon index as well as higher densities and biomasses than the QCC method for five taxa. Overall, invertebrate community structure was different between the two sampling methods. In light of differences in the metrics determined for the two sampling methods, the ultimate choice of a sampling method for wetland invertebrates should be based on study objectives.
ISSN:0277-5212
1943-6246
DOI:10.1007/s13157-013-0462-5