Exclusionary Logics: Constructing Disability and Disadvantaging Disabled Academics in the Neoliberal University

Contemporary academia features managerialism and neoliberal thinking, consequent of an increasingly dominant market logic. This article draws on interviews with disabled academics, line managers, human resources professionals, estates staff, health and safety staff, and trade union representatives,...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Sociology (Oxford) 2024-02, Vol.58 (1), p.23-44
Main Authors: Remnant, Jennifer, Sang, Katherine, Calvard, Tom, Richards, James, Babajide, Olugbenga (Abraham)
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Academic achievement
Academic staff
Academic work
Colleges & universities
Disability
Dismissal
Equality
Estates
Human resources
Labor unions
Managerial authority
Markets
Neoliberalism
Obstruction
Performance management
Rhetoric
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Contemporary academia features managerialism and neoliberal thinking, consequent of an increasingly dominant market logic. This article draws on interviews with disabled academics, line managers, human resources professionals, estates staff, health and safety staff, and trade union representatives, alongside university policy documents, to discuss the impact of this logic on the experiences of disabled academics. Understandings of disability across professional groups were divorced from institutional rhetoric of Equality, Diversity and Inclusion, aligning more clearly with market logic, manifest in performance management and idealised notions of academic work. Unlike students, disabled academics are required to navigate hostile policies and procedures. Their diagnoses are used in points of dispute relating to performance, or as an obstruction to dismissal tolerated out of legal obligation. This article illustrates the need for a change in university institutional logics to undo the damaging limitations of following market models of education.
ISSN:0038-0385
1469-8684
DOI:10.1177/00380385231162570