Loading…

Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers

ABSTRACT We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference‐in‐Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close”...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Journal of accounting research 2024-03, Vol.62 (1), p.55-99
Main Authors: BANERJEE, SHANTANU, DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO, SHI, RUI, YAN, JIALI
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63
cites cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63
container_end_page 99
container_issue 1
container_start_page 55
container_title Journal of accounting research
container_volume 62
creator BANERJEE, SHANTANU
DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO
SHI, RUI
YAN, JIALI
description ABSTRACT We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference‐in‐Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks.” Disclosure by close peers—especially those with co‐coverage and co‐ownership links—also increases following fraud revelation. Although disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1475-679X.12510
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2921035570</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2921035570</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwHPayfpJrs5lvpVKRRsBW8hTWfp1t1kTbbK_nu3Vrw6lxmG552Bh5BrBresrxFLM5HITL3dMi4YnJDB3-aUDAA4S_JUyHNyEeMOAJQYswFZzFzhQ23a0js69XVTYY2uNaFsS4zUuA1tt0jvOmfq0kbqC7oKxsXGBHS2o8utt-902ZRV5T8xxEtyVpgq4tVvH5LXh_vV9CmZLx5n08k8sWmaQSI52CwvzGZjmJDKcAGZAoYm4yikhJznpuAWrQLDEdiaAzIr1TpX_VjI8ZDcHO82wX_sMbZ65_fB9S81V5zBWIgMemp0pGzwMQYsdBPK2oROM9AHa_rgSB8c6R9rfUIeE19lhd1_uH5eTF6OwW_gfG82</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2921035570</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers</title><source>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</source><source>Business Source Ultimate</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell Read &amp; Publish Collection</source><creator>BANERJEE, SHANTANU ; DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO ; SHI, RUI ; YAN, JIALI</creator><creatorcontrib>BANERJEE, SHANTANU ; DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO ; SHI, RUI ; YAN, JIALI</creatorcontrib><description>ABSTRACT We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&amp;P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference‐in‐Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks.” Disclosure by close peers—especially those with co‐coverage and co‐ownership links—also increases following fraud revelation. Although disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8456</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1475-679X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1475-679X.12510</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Chicago: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Capital ; Companies ; Cost of capital ; cost of equity ; disclosure ; Fraud ; information complementarity ; information environment ; Misconduct ; Ownership ; Peers ; Professional misconduct ; Transparency</subject><ispartof>Journal of accounting research, 2024-03, Vol.62 (1), p.55-99</ispartof><rights>2023 The Authors. published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Chookaszian Accounting Research Center at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.</rights><rights>2023. This article is published under http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0346-7285 ; 0009-0001-4176-3237 ; 0000-0001-5116-4548 ; 0000-0002-5247-748X</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925,33223</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>BANERJEE, SHANTANU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, RUI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAN, JIALI</creatorcontrib><title>Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers</title><title>Journal of accounting research</title><description>ABSTRACT We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&amp;P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference‐in‐Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks.” Disclosure by close peers—especially those with co‐coverage and co‐ownership links—also increases following fraud revelation. Although disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.</description><subject>Capital</subject><subject>Companies</subject><subject>Cost of capital</subject><subject>cost of equity</subject><subject>disclosure</subject><subject>Fraud</subject><subject>information complementarity</subject><subject>information environment</subject><subject>Misconduct</subject><subject>Ownership</subject><subject>Peers</subject><subject>Professional misconduct</subject><subject>Transparency</subject><issn>0021-8456</issn><issn>1475-679X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>24P</sourceid><sourceid>8BJ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkE1LAzEQhoMoWKtnrwHPayfpJrs5lvpVKRRsBW8hTWfp1t1kTbbK_nu3Vrw6lxmG552Bh5BrBresrxFLM5HITL3dMi4YnJDB3-aUDAA4S_JUyHNyEeMOAJQYswFZzFzhQ23a0js69XVTYY2uNaFsS4zUuA1tt0jvOmfq0kbqC7oKxsXGBHS2o8utt-902ZRV5T8xxEtyVpgq4tVvH5LXh_vV9CmZLx5n08k8sWmaQSI52CwvzGZjmJDKcAGZAoYm4yikhJznpuAWrQLDEdiaAzIr1TpX_VjI8ZDcHO82wX_sMbZ65_fB9S81V5zBWIgMemp0pGzwMQYsdBPK2oROM9AHa_rgSB8c6R9rfUIeE19lhd1_uH5eTF6OwW_gfG82</recordid><startdate>202403</startdate><enddate>202403</enddate><creator>BANERJEE, SHANTANU</creator><creator>DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO</creator><creator>SHI, RUI</creator><creator>YAN, JIALI</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><scope>24P</scope><scope>WIN</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-7285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4176-3237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-4548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5247-748X</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202403</creationdate><title>Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers</title><author>BANERJEE, SHANTANU ; DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO ; SHI, RUI ; YAN, JIALI</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Capital</topic><topic>Companies</topic><topic>Cost of capital</topic><topic>cost of equity</topic><topic>disclosure</topic><topic>Fraud</topic><topic>information complementarity</topic><topic>information environment</topic><topic>Misconduct</topic><topic>Ownership</topic><topic>Peers</topic><topic>Professional misconduct</topic><topic>Transparency</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>BANERJEE, SHANTANU</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>SHI, RUI</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>YAN, JIALI</creatorcontrib><collection>Wiley Online Library Open Access</collection><collection>Wiley Free Archive</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>BANERJEE, SHANTANU</au><au>DASGUPTA, SUDIPTO</au><au>SHI, RUI</au><au>YAN, JIALI</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers</atitle><jtitle>Journal of accounting research</jtitle><date>2024-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>62</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>55</spage><epage>99</epage><pages>55-99</pages><issn>0021-8456</issn><eissn>1475-679X</eissn><abstract>ABSTRACT We show that information complementarities play an important role in the spillover of transparency shocks. We exploit the revelation of financial misconduct by S&amp;P 500 firms, and in a “Stacked Difference‐in‐Differences” design, find that the implied cost of capital increases for “close” industry peers of the fraudulent firms relative to “distant” industry peers. The spillover effect is particularly strong when the close peers and the fraudulent firm share common analyst coverage and common institutional ownership, which have been shown to be powerful proxies for fundamental linkages and information complementarities. We provide evidence that increase in the cost of capital of peer firms is due, at least in part, to “beta shocks.” Disclosure by close peers—especially those with co‐coverage and co‐ownership links—also increases following fraud revelation. Although disclosure remains high in the following years, the cost of equity starts to decrease.</abstract><cop>Chicago</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1475-679X.12510</doi><tpages>45</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0346-7285</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0009-0001-4176-3237</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5116-4548</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5247-748X</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8456
ispartof Journal of accounting research, 2024-03, Vol.62 (1), p.55-99
issn 0021-8456
1475-679X
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2921035570
source International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS); Business Source Ultimate; Wiley-Blackwell Read & Publish Collection
subjects Capital
Companies
Cost of capital
cost of equity
disclosure
Fraud
information complementarity
information environment
Misconduct
Ownership
Peers
Professional misconduct
Transparency
title Information Complementarities and the Dynamics of Transparency Shock Spillovers
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T06%3A11%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Information%20Complementarities%20and%20the%20Dynamics%20of%20Transparency%20Shock%20Spillovers&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20accounting%20research&rft.au=BANERJEE,%20SHANTANU&rft.date=2024-03&rft.volume=62&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=55&rft.epage=99&rft.pages=55-99&rft.issn=0021-8456&rft.eissn=1475-679X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1475-679X.12510&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2921035570%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c4470-620c78fadda1569a2507901ea72e5660828af2cec90a2e01b20e1c69b89b20f63%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2921035570&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true