Verifiable evaluations of machine learning models using zkSNARKs

In a world of increasing closed-source commercial machine learning models, model evaluations from developers must be taken at face value. These benchmark results-whether over task accuracy, bias evaluations, or safety checks-are traditionally impossible to verify by a model end-user without the cost...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-05
Main Authors: South, Tobin, Camuto, Alexander, Jain, Shrey, Nguyen, Shayla, Mahari, Robert, Paquin, Christian, Morton, Jason, Pentland, Alex 'Sandy'
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Benchmarks
Machine learning
Mathematical models
Neural networks
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:In a world of increasing closed-source commercial machine learning models, model evaluations from developers must be taken at face value. These benchmark results-whether over task accuracy, bias evaluations, or safety checks-are traditionally impossible to verify by a model end-user without the costly or impossible process of re-performing the benchmark on black-box model outputs. This work presents a method of verifiable model evaluation using model inference through zkSNARKs. The resulting zero-knowledge computational proofs of model outputs over datasets can be packaged into verifiable evaluation attestations showing that models with fixed private weights achieve stated performance or fairness metrics over public inputs. We present a flexible proving system that enables verifiable attestations to be performed on any standard neural network model with varying compute requirements. For the first time, we demonstrate this across a sample of real-world models and highlight key challenges and design solutions. This presents a new transparency paradigm in the verifiable evaluation of private models.
ISSN:2331-8422