Direct Language Model Alignment from Online AI Feedback

Direct alignment from preferences (DAP) methods, such as DPO, have recently emerged as efficient alternatives to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), that do not require a separate reward model. However, the preference datasets used in DAP methods are usually collected ahead of trainin...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:arXiv.org 2024-02
Main Authors: Guo, Shangmin, Zhang, Biao, Liu, Tianlin, Liu, Tianqi, Khalman, Misha, Llinares, Felipe, Rame, Alexandre, Mesnard, Thomas, Zhao, Yao, Piot, Bilal, Ferret, Johan, Blondel, Mathieu
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Alignment
Controllability
Datasets
Feedback
Iterative methods
Large language models
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Direct alignment from preferences (DAP) methods, such as DPO, have recently emerged as efficient alternatives to reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF), that do not require a separate reward model. However, the preference datasets used in DAP methods are usually collected ahead of training and never updated, thus the feedback is purely offline. Moreover, responses in these datasets are often sampled from a language model distinct from the one being aligned, and since the model evolves over training, the alignment phase is inevitably off-policy. In this study, we posit that online feedback is key and improves DAP methods. Our method, online AI feedback (OAIF), uses an LLM as annotator: on each training iteration, we sample two responses from the current model and prompt the LLM annotator to choose which one is preferred, thus providing online feedback. Despite its simplicity, we demonstrate via human evaluation in several tasks that OAIF outperforms both offline DAP and RLHF methods. We further show that the feedback leveraged in OAIF is easily controllable, via instruction prompts to the LLM annotator.
ISSN:2331-8422