Loading…
Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution?
This study proposes a model of several dimensions through which products of teachers’ context-based mathematics problem posing (PP) can be modified. The dimensions are Correctness, Authenticity, Task Assortment (consisting of Mathematical Diversity, Multiple Data Representations, Question–Answer For...
Saved in:
Published in: | Educational studies in mathematics 2024-02, Vol.115 (2), p.223-246 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843 |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843 |
container_end_page | 246 |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 223 |
container_title | Educational studies in mathematics |
container_volume | 115 |
creator | Marco, Nadav Palatnik, Alik |
description | This study proposes a model of several dimensions through which products of teachers’ context-based mathematics problem posing (PP) can be modified. The dimensions are Correctness, Authenticity, Task Assortment (consisting of Mathematical Diversity, Multiple Data Representations, Question–Answer Format, Precision-Approximation, and Generalization), Task Flow, and Student Involvement. A study was conducted in the context of a professional development (PD) program in which eight secondary school teachers iteratively designed 22 context-based mathematics tasks. Using the variation theory of learning as a theoretical framework and qualitative content analysis methodology, we compared different versions of the same tasks, focusing on items participants added or revised. To demonstrate the usability of the resulting semi-hierarchical model, we apply it to characterize the teachers’ final products of context-based PP. We found that most items teachers composed did not deviate from what we call the “common item form”—items that require numeric, exact, particular-case-related, and close-form answers without involving students in decision-making. Our findings may inform teacher educators and researchers on planning and implementing context-based mathematics task development by teachers in PD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s10649-023-10271-8 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_cross</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2925074288</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2925074288</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwApwicR5wllnCBaGKTarEpZwjT5YutDMlybC8PSlF4sbFPvj7besj5JzBJQOoryKDSqoCuCgY8JoVzQEZsbIWBTSsOiQjAJZHqpTH5CTGFQA0OTcibubQLFyIdNtHR7Gz1Lq4nHfU9F1yn6loMTpLN5gWLpeliTRhfI3X9GOBiRrsaOvo2mHoMuZDv6Hb0NvBJOre-_WQln13c0qOPK6jO_vtY_JyfzebPBbT54enye20MIKpVFQoW-FbYRWvhakZUwZb9NCUEiplmax55UtlUUnfcG9RokdWWRCiBdFIMSYX-735hbfBxaRX_RC6fFJzxUuoJW-aTPE9ZUIfY3Beb8Nyg-FLM9A7nXqvU2ed-ken3oXEPhQz3M1d-Fv9T-obWc94pg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2925074288</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution?</title><source>Springer Link</source><creator>Marco, Nadav ; Palatnik, Alik</creator><creatorcontrib>Marco, Nadav ; Palatnik, Alik</creatorcontrib><description>This study proposes a model of several dimensions through which products of teachers’ context-based mathematics problem posing (PP) can be modified. The dimensions are Correctness, Authenticity, Task Assortment (consisting of Mathematical Diversity, Multiple Data Representations, Question–Answer Format, Precision-Approximation, and Generalization), Task Flow, and Student Involvement. A study was conducted in the context of a professional development (PD) program in which eight secondary school teachers iteratively designed 22 context-based mathematics tasks. Using the variation theory of learning as a theoretical framework and qualitative content analysis methodology, we compared different versions of the same tasks, focusing on items participants added or revised. To demonstrate the usability of the resulting semi-hierarchical model, we apply it to characterize the teachers’ final products of context-based PP. We found that most items teachers composed did not deviate from what we call the “common item form”—items that require numeric, exact, particular-case-related, and close-form answers without involving students in decision-making. Our findings may inform teacher educators and researchers on planning and implementing context-based mathematics task development by teachers in PD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-1954</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1573-0816</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s10649-023-10271-8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands</publisher><subject>Content analysis ; Context ; Education ; Learning theory ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematics ; Mathematics Education ; Professional development ; Qualitative analysis ; Teachers</subject><ispartof>Educational studies in mathematics, 2024-02, Vol.115 (2), p.223-246</ispartof><rights>The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2023. Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843</cites><orcidid>0000-0003-4063-5003</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Marco, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palatnik, Alik</creatorcontrib><title>Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution?</title><title>Educational studies in mathematics</title><addtitle>Educ Stud Math</addtitle><description>This study proposes a model of several dimensions through which products of teachers’ context-based mathematics problem posing (PP) can be modified. The dimensions are Correctness, Authenticity, Task Assortment (consisting of Mathematical Diversity, Multiple Data Representations, Question–Answer Format, Precision-Approximation, and Generalization), Task Flow, and Student Involvement. A study was conducted in the context of a professional development (PD) program in which eight secondary school teachers iteratively designed 22 context-based mathematics tasks. Using the variation theory of learning as a theoretical framework and qualitative content analysis methodology, we compared different versions of the same tasks, focusing on items participants added or revised. To demonstrate the usability of the resulting semi-hierarchical model, we apply it to characterize the teachers’ final products of context-based PP. We found that most items teachers composed did not deviate from what we call the “common item form”—items that require numeric, exact, particular-case-related, and close-form answers without involving students in decision-making. Our findings may inform teacher educators and researchers on planning and implementing context-based mathematics task development by teachers in PD.</description><subject>Content analysis</subject><subject>Context</subject><subject>Education</subject><subject>Learning theory</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematics</subject><subject>Mathematics Education</subject><subject>Professional development</subject><subject>Qualitative analysis</subject><subject>Teachers</subject><issn>0013-1954</issn><issn>1573-0816</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMlOAzEMhiMEEqXwApwicR5wllnCBaGKTarEpZwjT5YutDMlybC8PSlF4sbFPvj7besj5JzBJQOoryKDSqoCuCgY8JoVzQEZsbIWBTSsOiQjAJZHqpTH5CTGFQA0OTcibubQLFyIdNtHR7Gz1Lq4nHfU9F1yn6loMTpLN5gWLpeliTRhfI3X9GOBiRrsaOvo2mHoMuZDv6Hb0NvBJOre-_WQln13c0qOPK6jO_vtY_JyfzebPBbT54enye20MIKpVFQoW-FbYRWvhakZUwZb9NCUEiplmax55UtlUUnfcG9RokdWWRCiBdFIMSYX-735hbfBxaRX_RC6fFJzxUuoJW-aTPE9ZUIfY3Beb8Nyg-FLM9A7nXqvU2ed-ken3oXEPhQz3M1d-Fv9T-obWc94pg</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Marco, Nadav</creator><creator>Palatnik, Alik</creator><general>Springer Netherlands</general><general>Springer Nature B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-5003</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution?</title><author>Marco, Nadav ; Palatnik, Alik</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Content analysis</topic><topic>Context</topic><topic>Education</topic><topic>Learning theory</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematics</topic><topic>Mathematics Education</topic><topic>Professional development</topic><topic>Qualitative analysis</topic><topic>Teachers</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Marco, Nadav</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Palatnik, Alik</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Educational studies in mathematics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Marco, Nadav</au><au>Palatnik, Alik</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution?</atitle><jtitle>Educational studies in mathematics</jtitle><stitle>Educ Stud Math</stitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>115</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>223</spage><epage>246</epage><pages>223-246</pages><issn>0013-1954</issn><eissn>1573-0816</eissn><abstract>This study proposes a model of several dimensions through which products of teachers’ context-based mathematics problem posing (PP) can be modified. The dimensions are Correctness, Authenticity, Task Assortment (consisting of Mathematical Diversity, Multiple Data Representations, Question–Answer Format, Precision-Approximation, and Generalization), Task Flow, and Student Involvement. A study was conducted in the context of a professional development (PD) program in which eight secondary school teachers iteratively designed 22 context-based mathematics tasks. Using the variation theory of learning as a theoretical framework and qualitative content analysis methodology, we compared different versions of the same tasks, focusing on items participants added or revised. To demonstrate the usability of the resulting semi-hierarchical model, we apply it to characterize the teachers’ final products of context-based PP. We found that most items teachers composed did not deviate from what we call the “common item form”—items that require numeric, exact, particular-case-related, and close-form answers without involving students in decision-making. Our findings may inform teacher educators and researchers on planning and implementing context-based mathematics task development by teachers in PD.</abstract><cop>Dordrecht</cop><pub>Springer Netherlands</pub><doi>10.1007/s10649-023-10271-8</doi><tpages>24</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4063-5003</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-1954 |
ispartof | Educational studies in mathematics, 2024-02, Vol.115 (2), p.223-246 |
issn | 0013-1954 1573-0816 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2925074288 |
source | Springer Link |
subjects | Content analysis Context Education Learning theory Mathematical analysis Mathematics Mathematics Education Professional development Qualitative analysis Teachers |
title | Teachers pose and design context-based mathematics tasks: what can be learned from product evolution? |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T21%3A32%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_cross&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Teachers%20pose%20and%20design%20context-based%20mathematics%20tasks:%20what%20can%20be%20learned%20from%20product%20evolution?&rft.jtitle=Educational%20studies%20in%20mathematics&rft.au=Marco,%20Nadav&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=115&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=223&rft.epage=246&rft.pages=223-246&rft.issn=0013-1954&rft.eissn=1573-0816&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s10649-023-10271-8&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_cross%3E2925074288%3C/proquest_cross%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c319t-6a4b3fb3d9273c7119cabaf0854069d14726f59da94f82fda4afa16d033b03843%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2925074288&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |