Loading…

Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization

Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error m...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:ChemRxiv 2024-02
Main Authors: Boelrijk, Jim, Molenaar, Stef R.A., Bos, Tijmen S., Dahlseid, Tina A., Ensing, Bernd, Stoll, Dwight R., Forré, Patrick, Pirok, Bob W.J.
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
cited_by
cites
container_end_page
container_issue
container_start_page
container_title ChemRxiv
container_volume
creator Boelrijk, Jim
Molenaar, Stef R.A.
Bos, Tijmen S.
Dahlseid, Tina A.
Ensing, Bernd
Stoll, Dwight R.
Forré, Patrick
Pirok, Bob W.J.
description Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.
doi_str_mv 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj
format article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_chemr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928383054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928383054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tOwzAYhC0kJKrSG7CIxNrgd5wlRAUqBXXTffTHtRuH5oGdVJSLcCAuRkVhNZv5Ps0gdEPJHVOCi3tT2zZ8-ANmhAks2_bQXKAZkynHjGX8Ci1ibAghTFJKhZyh5bKroTO-2yVF_v1V5Em0AwQYfd_FZKxDP-3q5HXajx5vIL4lj3C00UOXrIfRt_7zt3mNLh3so1385Rxtnpab_AUX6-dV_lBgQ6lssLKWZlUqqkpp4lICYIBTl3FwgqWGOGoqq4zQW-ooZWTrpDAgmbGGV1rzOSJn7f_Ncgi-hXAslTROKWmVMpRrmrLMAFMWTsjtGRlC_z7ZOJZNP4XuNLJkGdNccyIF_wGB3l_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928383054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>EISSN: 2573-2293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytical Chemistry ; Bayesian analysis ; Chemistry ; Chemoinformatics ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass Spectrometry ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Optimization ; Parameters ; Retention ; Separation Science ; Trial and error methods ; User experience</subject><ispartof>ChemRxiv, 2024-02</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0728-6385 ; 0000-0002-4913-3571 ; 0000-0003-3922-6616 ; 0000-0002-4142-7233 ; 0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://chemrxiv.org/engage/api-gateway/chemrxiv/assets/orp/resource/item/65cf665e66c1381729ca26ea/smallThumb/enhancing-lc-lc-separations-through-multi-task-bayesian-optimization.jpg</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2928383054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,776,780,881,25731,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><title>ChemRxiv</title><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemoinformatics</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Separation Science</subject><subject>Trial and error methods</subject><subject>User experience</subject><issn>2573-2293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tOwzAYhC0kJKrSG7CIxNrgd5wlRAUqBXXTffTHtRuH5oGdVJSLcCAuRkVhNZv5Ps0gdEPJHVOCi3tT2zZ8-ANmhAks2_bQXKAZkynHjGX8Ci1ibAghTFJKhZyh5bKroTO-2yVF_v1V5Em0AwQYfd_FZKxDP-3q5HXajx5vIL4lj3C00UOXrIfRt_7zt3mNLh3so1385Rxtnpab_AUX6-dV_lBgQ6lssLKWZlUqqkpp4lICYIBTl3FwgqWGOGoqq4zQW-ooZWTrpDAgmbGGV1rzOSJn7f_Ncgi-hXAslTROKWmVMpRrmrLMAFMWTsjtGRlC_z7ZOJZNP4XuNLJkGdNccyIF_wGB3l_Q</recordid><startdate>20240219</startdate><enddate>20240219</enddate><creator>Boelrijk, Jim</creator><creator>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creator><creator>Bos, Tijmen S.</creator><creator>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creator><creator>Ensing, Bernd</creator><creator>Stoll, Dwight R.</creator><creator>Forré, Patrick</creator><creator>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>CQEMM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240219</creationdate><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><author>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemoinformatics</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Separation Science</topic><topic>Trial and error methods</topic><topic>User experience</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ChemRxiv</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boelrijk, Jim</au><au>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</au><au>Bos, Tijmen S.</au><au>Dahlseid, Tina A.</au><au>Ensing, Bernd</au><au>Stoll, Dwight R.</au><au>Forré, Patrick</au><au>Pirok, Bob W.J.</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</atitle><jtitle>ChemRxiv</jtitle><date>2024-02-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2573-2293</eissn><abstract>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj</doi><edition>1</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier EISSN: 2573-2293
ispartof ChemRxiv, 2024-02
issn 2573-2293
language eng
recordid cdi_proquest_journals_2928383054
source Publicly Available Content Database
subjects Algorithms
Analytical Chemistry
Bayesian analysis
Chemistry
Chemoinformatics
Liquid chromatography
Mass Spectrometry
Mathematical models
Modelling
Optimization
Parameters
Retention
Separation Science
Trial and error methods
User experience
title Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization
url http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A54%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_chemr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20LC%C3%97LC%20separations%20through%20Multi-Task%20Bayesian%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=ChemRxiv&rft.au=Boelrijk,%20Jim&rft.date=2024-02-19&rft.eissn=2573-2293&rft_id=info:doi/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_chemr%3E2928383054%3C/proquest_chemr%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928383054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true