Loading…
Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization
Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error m...
Saved in:
Published in: | ChemRxiv 2024-02 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | ChemRxiv |
container_volume | |
creator | Boelrijk, Jim Molenaar, Stef R.A. Bos, Tijmen S. Dahlseid, Tina A. Ensing, Bernd Stoll, Dwight R. Forré, Patrick Pirok, Bob W.J. |
description | Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical. |
doi_str_mv | 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_chemr</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2928383054</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>2928383054</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1j0tOwzAYhC0kJKrSG7CIxNrgd5wlRAUqBXXTffTHtRuH5oGdVJSLcCAuRkVhNZv5Ps0gdEPJHVOCi3tT2zZ8-ANmhAks2_bQXKAZkynHjGX8Ci1ibAghTFJKhZyh5bKroTO-2yVF_v1V5Em0AwQYfd_FZKxDP-3q5HXajx5vIL4lj3C00UOXrIfRt_7zt3mNLh3so1385Rxtnpab_AUX6-dV_lBgQ6lssLKWZlUqqkpp4lICYIBTl3FwgqWGOGoqq4zQW-ooZWTrpDAgmbGGV1rzOSJn7f_Ncgi-hXAslTROKWmVMpRrmrLMAFMWTsjtGRlC_z7ZOJZNP4XuNLJkGdNccyIF_wGB3l_Q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2928383054</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database</source><creator>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</description><edition>1</edition><identifier>EISSN: 2573-2293</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Algorithms ; Analytical Chemistry ; Bayesian analysis ; Chemistry ; Chemoinformatics ; Liquid chromatography ; Mass Spectrometry ; Mathematical models ; Modelling ; Optimization ; Parameters ; Retention ; Separation Science ; Trial and error methods ; User experience</subject><ispartof>ChemRxiv, 2024-02</ispartof><rights>2024. This work is licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (the “License”). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0728-6385 ; 0000-0002-4913-3571 ; 0000-0003-3922-6616 ; 0000-0002-4142-7233 ; 0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://chemrxiv.org/engage/api-gateway/chemrxiv/assets/orp/resource/item/65cf665e66c1381729ca26ea/smallThumb/enhancing-lc-lc-separations-through-multi-task-bayesian-optimization.jpg</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2928383054?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,776,780,881,25731,27902,36989,44566</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><title>ChemRxiv</title><description>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</description><subject>Algorithms</subject><subject>Analytical Chemistry</subject><subject>Bayesian analysis</subject><subject>Chemistry</subject><subject>Chemoinformatics</subject><subject>Liquid chromatography</subject><subject>Mass Spectrometry</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Modelling</subject><subject>Optimization</subject><subject>Parameters</subject><subject>Retention</subject><subject>Separation Science</subject><subject>Trial and error methods</subject><subject>User experience</subject><issn>2573-2293</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNo1j0tOwzAYhC0kJKrSG7CIxNrgd5wlRAUqBXXTffTHtRuH5oGdVJSLcCAuRkVhNZv5Ps0gdEPJHVOCi3tT2zZ8-ANmhAks2_bQXKAZkynHjGX8Ci1ibAghTFJKhZyh5bKroTO-2yVF_v1V5Em0AwQYfd_FZKxDP-3q5HXajx5vIL4lj3C00UOXrIfRt_7zt3mNLh3so1385Rxtnpab_AUX6-dV_lBgQ6lssLKWZlUqqkpp4lICYIBTl3FwgqWGOGoqq4zQW-ooZWTrpDAgmbGGV1rzOSJn7f_Ncgi-hXAslTROKWmVMpRrmrLMAFMWTsjtGRlC_z7ZOJZNP4XuNLJkGdNccyIF_wGB3l_Q</recordid><startdate>20240219</startdate><enddate>20240219</enddate><creator>Boelrijk, Jim</creator><creator>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creator><creator>Bos, Tijmen S.</creator><creator>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creator><creator>Ensing, Bernd</creator><creator>Stoll, Dwight R.</creator><creator>Forré, Patrick</creator><creator>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>8BQ</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>JG9</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>CQEMM</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240219</creationdate><title>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</title><author>Boelrijk, Jim ; Molenaar, Stef R.A. ; Bos, Tijmen S. ; Dahlseid, Tina A. ; Ensing, Bernd ; Stoll, Dwight R. ; Forré, Patrick ; Pirok, Bob W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Algorithms</topic><topic>Analytical Chemistry</topic><topic>Bayesian analysis</topic><topic>Chemistry</topic><topic>Chemoinformatics</topic><topic>Liquid chromatography</topic><topic>Mass Spectrometry</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Modelling</topic><topic>Optimization</topic><topic>Parameters</topic><topic>Retention</topic><topic>Separation Science</topic><topic>Trial and error methods</topic><topic>User experience</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Boelrijk, Jim</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bos, Tijmen S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dahlseid, Tina A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ensing, Bernd</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Stoll, Dwight R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Forré, Patrick</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pirok, Bob W.J.</creatorcontrib><collection>METADEX</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ChemRxiv</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Boelrijk, Jim</au><au>Molenaar, Stef R.A.</au><au>Bos, Tijmen S.</au><au>Dahlseid, Tina A.</au><au>Ensing, Bernd</au><au>Stoll, Dwight R.</au><au>Forré, Patrick</au><au>Pirok, Bob W.J.</au><format>book</format><genre>document</genre><ristype>GEN</ristype><atitle>Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization</atitle><jtitle>ChemRxiv</jtitle><date>2024-02-19</date><risdate>2024</risdate><eissn>2573-2293</eissn><abstract>Method development in comprehensive two-dimensional liquid chromatography (LC×LC) is a challenging process. The interdependencies between the two dimensions and the possibility of incorporating complex gradient profiles, such as multi-segmented gradients or shifting gradients, make trial-and-error method development time-consuming and highly dependent on user experience. Retention modeling and Bayesian optimization (BO) have been proposed as solutions to mitigate these issues. However, both approaches have their strengths and weaknesses. On one hand, retention modeling depends on effective peak tracking and accurate retention time and width predictions, becoming increasingly challenging for complex samples and advanced gradient assemblies. On the other hand, Bayesian optimization may require many experiments when dealing with many adjustable parameters, as in LC×LC. Therefore, in this work, we investigate the use of multi-task Bayesian optimization (MTBO), a method that can combine information from both retention modeling and experimental measurements. The algorithm was first tested and compared with BO using a synthetic retention modeling test case, where it was shown that MTBO finds better optima with fewer method-development iterations than conventional BO. Next, the algorithm was tested on the optimization of a method for a pesticide sample and we found that the algorithm was able to improve upon the initial scanning experiments. Multi-task Bayesian optimization is a promising technique in situations where modeling retention is challenging, and the high number of adjustable parameters and/or limited optimization budget makes traditional Bayesian optimization impractical.</abstract><cop>Washington</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj</doi><edition>1</edition><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0728-6385</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4913-3571</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3922-6616</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4142-7233</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8385-5706</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | EISSN: 2573-2293 |
ispartof | ChemRxiv, 2024-02 |
issn | 2573-2293 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2928383054 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database |
subjects | Algorithms Analytical Chemistry Bayesian analysis Chemistry Chemoinformatics Liquid chromatography Mass Spectrometry Mathematical models Modelling Optimization Parameters Retention Separation Science Trial and error methods User experience |
title | Enhancing LC×LC separations through Multi-Task Bayesian Optimization |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-02T09%3A54%3A46IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_chemr&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=document&rft.atitle=Enhancing%20LC%C3%97LC%20separations%20through%20Multi-Task%20Bayesian%20Optimization&rft.jtitle=ChemRxiv&rft.au=Boelrijk,%20Jim&rft.date=2024-02-19&rft.eissn=2573-2293&rft_id=info:doi/10.26434/chemrxiv-2024-5mmvj&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_chemr%3E2928383054%3C/proquest_chemr%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c115j-6ee19b74bb680f70aaca31f93af427c0f1cbe6c48d1f1120df54ca52cec3b883%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2928383054&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |