Loading…
Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens
This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the coverage of sustainability reporting (SR) aspects within the corpus of qualitative SR literature. It seeks to elucidate the theoretical and conceptual foundations that have guided the trajectory of the sustainability field and illuminate t...
Saved in:
Published in: | Journal of risk and financial management 2024-02, Vol.17 (2), p.68 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
cited_by | |
---|---|
cites | cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2128-859765d2fca1db1ba2bbf2fe2e68fe3563a4da64f97fb456dfbc2b4b1333c2073 |
container_end_page | |
container_issue | 2 |
container_start_page | 68 |
container_title | Journal of risk and financial management |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Dincer, Banu Dincer, Caner |
description | This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the coverage of sustainability reporting (SR) aspects within the corpus of qualitative SR literature. It seeks to elucidate the theoretical and conceptual foundations that have guided the trajectory of the sustainability field and illuminate the qualitative methodologies used in this body of literature. Employing a systematic review methodology, this study undertakes an exhaustive examination of 242 selected empirical studies on sustainability reporting conducted during the period spanning from 2001 to 2022. The noteworthy contribution of this review to the realm of sustainability research lies in its identification of unexplored and underexplored domains that merit attention in forthcoming investigations. These include but are not limited to employee health and safety practices, product responsibility, and gender dynamics. While stakeholder theory and institutional theory have been dominant theories within the selected literature, the exploration of moral legitimacy remains largely underinvestigated. It is essential to underscore that this review exclusively encompasses qualitative studies, owing to the richness and versatility inherent in qualitative research methods. This deliberate selection enables researchers to employ diverse methodological and theoretical frameworks to gain a profound understanding of engagement within the practice of sustainability reporting. This review introduces an interesting approach by considering the thematic scope, as well as theoretical and methodological choices, observed across the selected studies. |
doi_str_mv | 10.3390/jrfm17020068 |
format | article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>gale_proqu</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_proquest_journals_2930976475</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><galeid>A784041688</galeid><sourcerecordid>A784041688</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2128-859765d2fca1db1ba2bbf2fe2e68fe3563a4da64f97fb456dfbc2b4b1333c2073</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUctqAjEUHUoLFeuuHxDoVm0e88h0J9KHIPRl10OSudGIk0yTWPDvG2sXchf3cO455y5Olt0SPGWsxvdbrztSYYpxyS-yAakJmXBc5Zdn-DobhbDFGBOcPIwPsm5hg1lvYkDGRoc-9yEKY4U0OxMP6AN656Ox6we08mDbMEaz0IOKCQjbotUGnIdolNihN_B_J_MDAWnvOiTQ-16kHHHk0BJsuMmutNgFGP3vYfb19Liav0yWr8-L-Ww5UZRQPuFFXZVFS7USpJVECiqlphoolFwDK0om8laUua4rLfOibLVUVOaSMMYUxRUbZnen3N677z2E2Gzd3tv0sqE1wyk9r4qkmp5Ua7GDxljtohcqTQudUc6CNomfVTzHOSk5T4bxyaC8C8GDbnpvOuEPDcHNsYTmvAT2C8mEe3E</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2930976475</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens</title><source>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</source><source>ABI/INFORM global</source><source>EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】</source><creator>Dincer, Banu ; Dincer, Caner</creator><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Banu ; Dincer, Caner</creatorcontrib><description>This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the coverage of sustainability reporting (SR) aspects within the corpus of qualitative SR literature. It seeks to elucidate the theoretical and conceptual foundations that have guided the trajectory of the sustainability field and illuminate the qualitative methodologies used in this body of literature. Employing a systematic review methodology, this study undertakes an exhaustive examination of 242 selected empirical studies on sustainability reporting conducted during the period spanning from 2001 to 2022. The noteworthy contribution of this review to the realm of sustainability research lies in its identification of unexplored and underexplored domains that merit attention in forthcoming investigations. These include but are not limited to employee health and safety practices, product responsibility, and gender dynamics. While stakeholder theory and institutional theory have been dominant theories within the selected literature, the exploration of moral legitimacy remains largely underinvestigated. It is essential to underscore that this review exclusively encompasses qualitative studies, owing to the richness and versatility inherent in qualitative research methods. This deliberate selection enables researchers to employ diverse methodological and theoretical frameworks to gain a profound understanding of engagement within the practice of sustainability reporting. This review introduces an interesting approach by considering the thematic scope, as well as theoretical and methodological choices, observed across the selected studies.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>ISSN: 1911-8066</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1911-8074</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.3390/jrfm17020068</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel: MDPI AG</publisher><subject>Citation indexes ; False information ; Qualitative research ; Research methodology ; Social accounting ; Social responsibility ; Stakeholders ; Sustainability reporting ; Sustainable development ; Trends</subject><ispartof>Journal of risk and financial management, 2024-02, Vol.17 (2), p.68</ispartof><rights>COPYRIGHT 2024 MDPI AG</rights><rights>2024 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). Notwithstanding the ProQuest Terms and Conditions, you may use this content in accordance with the terms of the License.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c2128-859765d2fca1db1ba2bbf2fe2e68fe3563a4da64f97fb456dfbc2b4b1333c2073</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-7101-5934</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2930976475/fulltextPDF?pq-origsite=primo$$EPDF$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.proquest.com/docview/2930976475?pq-origsite=primo$$EHTML$$P50$$Gproquest$$Hfree_for_read</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,11667,25731,27901,27902,36037,36989,44339,44566,74638,74869</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Caner</creatorcontrib><title>Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens</title><title>Journal of risk and financial management</title><description>This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the coverage of sustainability reporting (SR) aspects within the corpus of qualitative SR literature. It seeks to elucidate the theoretical and conceptual foundations that have guided the trajectory of the sustainability field and illuminate the qualitative methodologies used in this body of literature. Employing a systematic review methodology, this study undertakes an exhaustive examination of 242 selected empirical studies on sustainability reporting conducted during the period spanning from 2001 to 2022. The noteworthy contribution of this review to the realm of sustainability research lies in its identification of unexplored and underexplored domains that merit attention in forthcoming investigations. These include but are not limited to employee health and safety practices, product responsibility, and gender dynamics. While stakeholder theory and institutional theory have been dominant theories within the selected literature, the exploration of moral legitimacy remains largely underinvestigated. It is essential to underscore that this review exclusively encompasses qualitative studies, owing to the richness and versatility inherent in qualitative research methods. This deliberate selection enables researchers to employ diverse methodological and theoretical frameworks to gain a profound understanding of engagement within the practice of sustainability reporting. This review introduces an interesting approach by considering the thematic scope, as well as theoretical and methodological choices, observed across the selected studies.</description><subject>Citation indexes</subject><subject>False information</subject><subject>Qualitative research</subject><subject>Research methodology</subject><subject>Social accounting</subject><subject>Social responsibility</subject><subject>Stakeholders</subject><subject>Sustainability reporting</subject><subject>Sustainable development</subject><subject>Trends</subject><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><issn>1911-8074</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>M0C</sourceid><sourceid>PIMPY</sourceid><recordid>eNpNUctqAjEUHUoLFeuuHxDoVm0e88h0J9KHIPRl10OSudGIk0yTWPDvG2sXchf3cO455y5Olt0SPGWsxvdbrztSYYpxyS-yAakJmXBc5Zdn-DobhbDFGBOcPIwPsm5hg1lvYkDGRoc-9yEKY4U0OxMP6AN656Ox6we08mDbMEaz0IOKCQjbotUGnIdolNihN_B_J_MDAWnvOiTQ-16kHHHk0BJsuMmutNgFGP3vYfb19Liav0yWr8-L-Ww5UZRQPuFFXZVFS7USpJVECiqlphoolFwDK0om8laUua4rLfOibLVUVOaSMMYUxRUbZnen3N677z2E2Gzd3tv0sqE1wyk9r4qkmp5Ua7GDxljtohcqTQudUc6CNomfVTzHOSk5T4bxyaC8C8GDbnpvOuEPDcHNsYTmvAT2C8mEe3E</recordid><startdate>20240201</startdate><enddate>20240201</enddate><creator>Dincer, Banu</creator><creator>Dincer, Caner</creator><general>MDPI AG</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7WY</scope><scope>7WZ</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>87Z</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>8FL</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>BEZIV</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FRNLG</scope><scope>F~G</scope><scope>K60</scope><scope>K6~</scope><scope>L.-</scope><scope>M0C</scope><scope>PIMPY</scope><scope>PQBIZ</scope><scope>PQBZA</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-5934</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20240201</creationdate><title>Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens</title><author>Dincer, Banu ; Dincer, Caner</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2128-859765d2fca1db1ba2bbf2fe2e68fe3563a4da64f97fb456dfbc2b4b1333c2073</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Citation indexes</topic><topic>False information</topic><topic>Qualitative research</topic><topic>Research methodology</topic><topic>Social accounting</topic><topic>Social responsibility</topic><topic>Stakeholders</topic><topic>Sustainability reporting</topic><topic>Sustainable development</topic><topic>Trends</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Banu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dincer, Caner</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>ABI商业信息数据库</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (PDF only)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>AUTh Library subscriptions: ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Premium Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>Business Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Global (Corporate)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Business Collection</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM Professional Advanced</collection><collection>ABI/INFORM global</collection><collection>Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3)</collection><collection>One Business (ProQuest)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Business (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dincer, Banu</au><au>Dincer, Caner</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens</atitle><jtitle>Journal of risk and financial management</jtitle><date>2024-02-01</date><risdate>2024</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>68</spage><pages>68-</pages><issn>1911-8074</issn><issn>1911-8066</issn><eissn>1911-8074</eissn><abstract>This review aims to provide a comprehensive synthesis of the coverage of sustainability reporting (SR) aspects within the corpus of qualitative SR literature. It seeks to elucidate the theoretical and conceptual foundations that have guided the trajectory of the sustainability field and illuminate the qualitative methodologies used in this body of literature. Employing a systematic review methodology, this study undertakes an exhaustive examination of 242 selected empirical studies on sustainability reporting conducted during the period spanning from 2001 to 2022. The noteworthy contribution of this review to the realm of sustainability research lies in its identification of unexplored and underexplored domains that merit attention in forthcoming investigations. These include but are not limited to employee health and safety practices, product responsibility, and gender dynamics. While stakeholder theory and institutional theory have been dominant theories within the selected literature, the exploration of moral legitimacy remains largely underinvestigated. It is essential to underscore that this review exclusively encompasses qualitative studies, owing to the richness and versatility inherent in qualitative research methods. This deliberate selection enables researchers to employ diverse methodological and theoretical frameworks to gain a profound understanding of engagement within the practice of sustainability reporting. This review introduces an interesting approach by considering the thematic scope, as well as theoretical and methodological choices, observed across the selected studies.</abstract><cop>Basel</cop><pub>MDPI AG</pub><doi>10.3390/jrfm17020068</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7101-5934</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1911-8074 |
ispartof | Journal of risk and financial management, 2024-02, Vol.17 (2), p.68 |
issn | 1911-8074 1911-8066 1911-8074 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_proquest_journals_2930976475 |
source | Publicly Available Content Database (Proquest) (PQ_SDU_P3); ABI/INFORM global; EconLit with Full Text【Remote access available】 |
subjects | Citation indexes False information Qualitative research Research methodology Social accounting Social responsibility Stakeholders Sustainability reporting Sustainable development Trends |
title | Insights into Sustainability Reporting: Trends, Aspects, and Theoretical Perspectives from a Qualitative Lens |
url | http://sfxeu10.hosted.exlibrisgroup.com/loughborough?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T08%3A28%3A13IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-gale_proqu&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Insights%20into%20Sustainability%20Reporting:%20Trends,%20Aspects,%20and%20Theoretical%20Perspectives%20from%20a%20Qualitative%20Lens&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20risk%20and%20financial%20management&rft.au=Dincer,%20Banu&rft.date=2024-02-01&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=68&rft.pages=68-&rft.issn=1911-8074&rft.eissn=1911-8074&rft_id=info:doi/10.3390/jrfm17020068&rft_dat=%3Cgale_proqu%3EA784041688%3C/gale_proqu%3E%3Cgrp_id%3Ecdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c2128-859765d2fca1db1ba2bbf2fe2e68fe3563a4da64f97fb456dfbc2b4b1333c2073%3C/grp_id%3E%3Coa%3E%3C/oa%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2930976475&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_galeid=A784041688&rfr_iscdi=true |