Loading…
The comparison of cleaning efficacy and apical extrusion of advanced irrigation activation methods with a novel Er:YAG laser modality: sweeps
Purpose Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) is an activation method that is based on transferring pulsed energy to the irrigation solution by using different fiber tips and generating explosive vapor bubbles with a secondary cavitation effect, causing rapid solution movement through the root canal. Thi...
Saved in:
Published in: | Lasers in dental science 2021-03, Vol.5 (1), p.43-52 |
---|---|
Main Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Subjects: | |
Citations: | Items that this one cites Items that cite this one |
Online Access: | Get full text |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Purpose
Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) is an activation method that is based on transferring pulsed energy to the irrigation solution by using different fiber tips and generating explosive vapor bubbles with a secondary cavitation effect, causing rapid solution movement through the root canal. This study aimed to compare different types of LAI and ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) in terms of cleaning efficacy by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images.
Methods
Sixty straight and single-rooted mature mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments up to F4. According to the final irrigation/agitation protocols, four experimental groups (
n
= 15) were generated as conventional laser–activated irrigation (group 1: C.LAI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (group 2: PIPS), shock wave–enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (group 3: SWEEPS), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (group 4:UAI). The irrigation protocols were performed for 60 s with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Debridement was evaluated using SEM with a scoring system. Apical extrusion was calculated using cube-shaped flower arrangement foam by subtracting the initial weights from the final weights. All data were statistically analyzed.
Results
C.LAI and SWEEPS showed significantly lower debris scores than PIPS and UAI (
p
|
---|---|
ISSN: | 2367-2587 2367-2587 |
DOI: | 10.1007/s41547-021-00113-2 |