Loading…

The comparison of cleaning efficacy and apical extrusion of advanced irrigation activation methods with a novel Er:YAG laser modality: sweeps

Purpose Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) is an activation method that is based on transferring pulsed energy to the irrigation solution by using different fiber tips and generating explosive vapor bubbles with a secondary cavitation effect, causing rapid solution movement through the root canal. Thi...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Published in:Lasers in dental science 2021-03, Vol.5 (1), p.43-52
Main Authors: Arıcıoğlu, Banu, Çıkman, Ahter Şanal, Babacan, Merve
Format: Article
Language:English
Subjects:
Citations: Items that this one cites
Items that cite this one
Online Access:Get full text
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
Description
Summary:Purpose Laser-activated irrigation (LAI) is an activation method that is based on transferring pulsed energy to the irrigation solution by using different fiber tips and generating explosive vapor bubbles with a secondary cavitation effect, causing rapid solution movement through the root canal. This study aimed to compare different types of LAI and ultrasonically activated irrigation (UAI) in terms of cleaning efficacy by using scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images. Methods Sixty straight and single-rooted mature mandibular premolars were prepared with ProTaper Ni-Ti rotary instruments up to F4. According to the final irrigation/agitation protocols, four experimental groups ( n  = 15) were generated as conventional laser–activated irrigation (group 1: C.LAI), photon-induced photoacoustic streaming (group 2: PIPS), shock wave–enhanced emission photoacoustic streaming (group 3: SWEEPS), and passive ultrasonic irrigation (group 4:UAI). The irrigation protocols were performed for 60 s with 2.5% NaOCl and 17% EDTA. Debridement was evaluated using SEM with a scoring system. Apical extrusion was calculated using cube-shaped flower arrangement foam by subtracting the initial weights from the final weights. All data were statistically analyzed. Results C.LAI and SWEEPS showed significantly lower debris scores than PIPS and UAI ( p  
ISSN:2367-2587
2367-2587
DOI:10.1007/s41547-021-00113-2